Daimler Agrees to Pay $2.2 Billion Diesel Emissions Settlement

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Daimler has officially agreed to pay $2.2 billion as a resolution to the United States’ diesel emissions cheating investigation and over 250,000 claims from Mercedes-Benz customers. The automaker stated that it was likely going to settle in August, estimating a need to set aside roughly $1.5 billion to appease U.S. authorities. Another $700 million was earmarked for civil suits, with the company assuming millions more would be needed to fulfill the requirements of the various settlements.

Court documents shared by Reuters show the company agreeing to pay 250,000 owners up to $3,290 each on vehicles that exceed regulatory emissions standards through the use of emissions cheating software. It also decided against opposing spending $83.4 million in attorney fees and expenses for the owners’ legal representation — something Volkswagen called “unwarranted” in a similarly sized suit where the attorneys were only asking for $59 million. However, VW’s emission woes have remained obnoxiously persistent since 2015 and have cost it well over $40 billion.

By contrast, Daimler is getting off with a slap on the wrist by settling for just a couple billion smackers. Although the likelihood of further criminal action remains relatively high in both the United States and Europe. Keep in mind that it took prosecutors nearly five years just to get this far and governments around the globe are disavowing diesel vehicles as if they appeared in a group photo on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island.

From Reuters:

Daimler noted in court papers it denies the allegations “and does not admit any liability.” The settlement does not include an external compliance monitor, it added. The German automaker still faces an ongoing criminal back investigation and could face additional U.S. financial penalties.

The settlements require Daimler to address the vehicles’ excess emissions as part of binding consent decrees. Daimler will issue recalls and extended warranties but is not required to buy back vehicles unless it is unable to offer an emissions fix within a required timetable.

The Justice Department said Daimler failed to disclose at least 16 auxiliary emissions control devices, the government alleged, allowing “vehicles to perform in a variety of consumer-desirable ways, including allowing for fewer (diesel exhaust fluid) tank refills (and) better fuel mileage.”

Breaking the fines down, the settlement includes an $875 million civil penalty over violating the Clean Air Act and an additional $546 million to “repair” polluting vehicles and offset excess emissions. Daimler will also have to pay the State of California $285.6 million and previously agreed to shell out 870 million euros (roughly $1 billion) in Germany over diesels that failed to meet EU regulations.

Deputy Attorney General Jeff Rosen said the American settlements “serve to deter any others who may be tempted to violate our nation’s pollution laws in the future.”

That seems probable but we’re doubtful that it will solve the problem outright. There are several other vehicle manufacturers that are under investigation for similar assumptions of industrial maleficence. Some, like Fiat Chrysler, are also on the hook for using illegal software (defeat devices) designed to falsify testing results used by federal regulators. Considering how difficult it seems to be for automakers to adhere to increasingly rigid emission mandates, we’re dubious that this all ends after a handful of gigantic fines. Though it may become a non-issue for diesel vehicles because the industry seems to be moving away from them as quickly as possible on most automotive applications.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock.com]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Whatnext Whatnext on Sep 15, 2020

    It was a big mistake for the Germans to flee diesels in Canada and judging from the price of used Touareg TDIs here, I'm not the only one who feels that way.

  • Brn Brn on Sep 15, 2020

    "$83.4 million in attorney fees and expenses for the owners’ legal representation" This is why class action lawsuits exist. Had one where I was owed about $50,000. We won a class action lawsuit and I got $11 (not eleven thousand, but just eleven). The firm got millions. I shoulda bought a diesel.

  • Johnster Maybe Buick-badged versions of the Suburban and Tahoe?
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh """As Ford and General Motors are taking billions of dollars in charges given that their electric vehicle plans didn’t play out as they were sabotaged by oil shill republicans"""Fixed that part for you ..
  • Ajla Cars, especially larger ones, falling so heavily out of favor with the buying public killed Buick and Chrysler. When it comes to utility vehicles I don't know what you can really do with either marque that isn't better accomplished with a different brand under their corporate umbrellas.
  • ToolGuy™ I don't deserve a modern BMW. 😅
  • Foaming Solvent Bring back four holes in the side of the front fenders. Also, the model names should be "Roadmaster," "Super," "Century," and "Electra."
Next