U.S. Subcompact Car Market Share Fell by Half Since 2016; Subcompact Crossover Segment Tripled Since 2013

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

No Yaris. No Fiesta. No Sonic. No Mazda2. No Fit.

America’s subcompact car segment is decimated. According to Tyson Jominy, the vice president of data and analytics at J.D. Power, 40 percent of last year’s subcompact sales are gone. Jominy doesn’t mean “fewer sales.” He means that the nameplates responsible for 40 percent of the sales are gone.

And is it any wonder? As recently as 2014, subcompact cars produced 3.8 percent of all U.S. auto sales. Collectively, the few remaining subcompact cars now account for just 1.4 percent of the American light vehicle market.

At the current rate of decline, fewer than 1 percent of the vehicles sold in America in 2022 will be subcompact cars. But we all know the current rate of decline is hardly an accurate harbinger. If subcompacts own 1 percent of the market in 2021, we’d be surprised.

Subcompact crossovers are hardly the only factors at play in the decline of subcompact cars. True, there’s an industry-wide shift from passenger cars to SUVs and crossovers, whether it’s Camry-to-RAV4, 3 Series-to-X3, or Impreza-to-Crosstrek. But beyond prevailing winds, subcompact cars also painted themselves into a corner.

Take fuel economy as an example. The most efficient Honda Fit and the most efficient Honda Civic will both cost $75 to run, the EPA says. What about actual payments? According to Toyota.com, leasing the least costly automatic-shift 2020 Corolla Hatchback will cost a grand total of $73 more less per month than the least costly 2020 Yaris Hatchback.

In other words, subcompact cars are typically less refined than compact cars. They’re usually slower. They’re rarely as nicely equipped. To counteract their demerits, subcompact cars offer the unique privilege of draining bank accounts at a more rapid rate.

Oh, the joy of tight turning circles.

Regardless of their own inadequacies, subcompact cars were selling at reasonable levels. Between 2012 and 2016, there were nearly 600,000 annual subcompact car sales in America, on average. 2015, however, represented a major swing in the market. It was the first time subcompact crossovers sold in greater numbers than subcompact cars. And there was no going back. Subcompact crossover market share (not including the Rogue Sport that Nissan folds into total Rogue volume) will soon be twice as strong as it was in 2015; subcompact cars will soon generate less than one-third the share they produced in 2015.

The shock-to-the-system of a pandemic-altered first-half did the dwindling subcompact car market no favors in early 2020. The ensuing incentives, such as interest rate drops that obviously lend far more favor to more costly products, have done virtually nothing to spur sales of America’s smallest cars. As auto sales fell 24 percent overall in 2020’s first six months, subcompact cars were down 51 percent, greater than twice the rate of decline.

Subcompact crossovers, meanwhile, lost only 7 percent of their volume while the overall market tumbled at more than three times the rate.

The die is cast.

[Images: Nissan, Hyundai]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • JLGOLDEN JLGOLDEN on Aug 17, 2020

    It seems that the 2013 Buick Encore was the pioneer in the "tiny SUV/CUV" class. It brought unforeseen customers into GM showrooms, and it had little competition for a while. Primitive as the Encore seems now, it's still a strong seller, when the deal is sweetened with generous discounts. The tiny CUVs are loved because of the refreshing combination of hatch utility, a slightly elevated seating position, and a relatively nimble handling feel.

  • ABC-2000 ABC-2000 on Aug 17, 2020

    Funny that Mazda, after many years, decided to bring the 2 to the US just to see it parked for a long time on dealer lots, even Toyota could not sale many of them in Yaris form.

    • SoCalMikester SoCalMikester on Aug 18, 2020

      they really werent marketed, even as the scion iA it was a 4 door, and most people will just step up to a corolla.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next