Rare Rides: The 1995 Eagle Vision - End of the Line

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
rare rides the 1995 eagle vision end of the line

It’s unofficially been Chrysler Time around the Rare Rides pages lately, and another Chrysler product follows up the New Yorker and Conquest. It was much more important product than either of those two, however, and it signified the end of one of Chrysler’s divisions.

Picture it: 1995, Eagle Vision.

The LH platform cars came at a critical time for Chrysler. The company’s bread-and-butter car sales for the previous decade-plus were generated by the K-car platform, and its many, many derivations. But those vehicles were getting long in the tooth, and Chrysler needed a more modern mainstream sedan offering. So it turned to Renault.

Or rather, the car which Renault and AMC developed together in the Eighties, and marketed as the Renault Premier in Europe and the Eagle Premier and Dodge Monaco in North America. The twins were not successful due to a combination of factors we won’t explore today (as that’s for another Rare Ride). But the modified monocoque Renault 25 platform which the Premier rode on was a good one, according to Bob Lutz, so the Premier served as a basis for its spiritual successor, the Eagle Vision. A small team of engineers worked on the project; the man in charge was from AMC. The benchmark for all LH cars was the Premier.

The exterior design was a rework of an abandoned 1987 Lamborghini sedan concept called Portofino. The cab-forward design was lauded after its debut at the Frankfurt Motor Show, but at the time Lamborghini was a new and recently bankrupted property at Chrysler. And anyway, 1987 was not a time of four-door super sedans. Portofino sat idle for a couple of years before it was dusted off and given a new purpose. The Dodge Intrepid and Eagle Vision debuted for the 1993 model year, followed by the Chrysler Concorde, LHS, and New Yorker (trim variations of the same car) for 1994.

There were two engine options in the LH cars, the smaller of which was the Chrysler 3.3-liter V6 that had powered its cars and minivans since 1990. A larger derivative of that engine (3.5-liters) was also available. All first-generation LH cars used a four-speed automatic transmission that was new for 1993.

The Vision was considered the sportiest LH car offering. It had less exterior badging than its Dodge or — especially — Chrysler siblings. The overall look was monochrome, with grey lower trim added to many examples for a more sporty, Pontiac-like look. Other unique features on the Vision were a standard Touring suspension and an optional Performance version.

For its entire run, there were two trims of Vision: ESi and upscale TSi. The TSi had more standard power equipment, leather powered seats, and a powered antenna not available on ESi. All TSi versions came standard with the larger 3.5-liter engine as well, good for 214 horsepower.

The Vision moved over 100,000 examples in the LH cars’ first generation, which ran through the 1997 model year. But by then the writing was on the wall for Eagle. The company was shedding products from its lineup by the turn of the Nineties, and by ’97 there were two left: Vision and Talon. It was decided to close the Eagle brand after 1998, as the Talon wrapped up its run. The sedan which was to become the second Vision was instead introduced a year after the other second-gen LH cars, as the Chrysler 300M. Chrysler marched on, sans Eagle.

Today’s Rare Ride is presently for sale in Illinois. With 170,000 miles on the odometer, it’s really in shockingly nice condition. Yours for $2,000.

[Images: seller]

Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Inside Looking Out You should care. With GM will die America. All signs are there. How about the Arsenal of Democracy? Toyota?
  • DenverMike What else did anyone think, when GM was losing tens of billions a year, year after year?
  • Bill Wade GM says they're killing Android Auto and Apple Carplay. Any company that makes decisions like that is doomed to die.
  • Jeff S I don't believe gm will die but that it will continue to shrink in product and market share and it will probably be acquired by a foreign manufacturer. I doubt gm lacks funds as it did in 2008 and that they have more than enough cash at hand but gm will not expand as it did in the past and the emphasis is more on profitability and cutting costs to the bone. Making gm a more attractive takeover target and cut costs at the expense of more desirable and reliable products. At the time of Farago's article I was in favor of the Government bailout more to save jobs and suppliers but today I would not be in favor of the bailout. My opinions on gm have changed since 2008 and 2009 and now I really don't care if gm survives or not.
  • Kwik_Shift I was a GM fan boy until it ended in 2013 when I traded in my Avalanche to go over to Nissan.