Uber Offering COVID-19 Contract Tracing Data to Government Entities

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
uber offering covid 19 contract tracing data to government entities

Uber Technologies Inc. has kicked off a new service that provides public health officials immediate access to data on drivers and riders who may have been in contact with someone infected with COVID-19. Weirdly, the company decided against announcing the sharing of your whereabouts with the government with any fanfare. Perhaps they thought average people wouldn’t be interested, or maybe that broadcasting their own participatory role in crafting a nightmare dystopia could be bad for business.

Then again, maybe this is exactly the kind of mass surveillance we need to flatten the curve, stop the spread, or whatever slogan is currently the trendiest. Worried? Don’t be. Uber said this service will be offered free of charge, meaning you don’t even have to spend any additional money to have your information shared.

What a sweet deal!

As this isn’t a medical journal, we can’t speak to the effectiveness of this strategy. We’ve seen it floating around for a while, with Big Tech gleefully eager to lend a hand and help combat the pandemic through contract tracing applications. You may have even seen one pop up on your phone recently following recent software update. From what we’ve seen, contract tracing has plenty of advocates and detractors.

Uber has actually been sharing data for months at this point, according to Reuters. The firm has only gotten vocal about it lately to promote itself to government health officials around the world. Data is collected and then sold to governments so health agencies can decide which persons need to be placed in quarantine.

From Reuters:

Uber has long provided data to U.S. law enforcement officials in emergencies or criminal investigations, companies officials said. It first began to focus on health-related issues in 2019, when a resurgence of U.S. measles cases prompted several health departments to request data, the officials said.

In January, company executives flew to Los Angeles to meet with the local health department and CDC officials to discuss how Uber’s data could best be used, according to Uber’s chief of global law enforcement, Mike Sullivan.

The discussion quickly turned to the novel coronavirus, which at the time was only beginning to spread outside of China.

“Our timing ended up being beneficial in that it allowed us to get ahead before COVID started ramping up globally,” said Sullivan, a veteran U.S. prosecutor who leads a team of 100 Uber employees handling data requests around the clock.

Uber reportedly designed a portal for exclusive utilization by public health departments. Information can be broken down by either trip receipts or passenger name. From there, the government can tell the company what actions they want it to take in regard to the paying customer they’ve ratted out to the feds.“We want to make sure that they are the experts and we follow their recommendations” on whether to block temporarily a driver/rider from being able to travel, explained Sullivan. Though the company automatically bans anybody it believes is infected automatically for two weeks.Government response varies between regions, with the United States being more passive/fractured than European nations or Australia. Tracing requests in the U.S. has proven more sporadic, often with some states taking a bigger interest in it than others — something which is also true of Canada. Reuters noted that Lyft also confirmed it’s been providing data to North American health officials through its Law Enforcement Request system. It declined to provide additional details however, hysterically citing privacy.For what it’s worth, Uber told us it doesn’t share anything that isn’t pertinent to the public health issue at hand, but that’s an evolving definition left largely to its own discretion. Governments may also decide that additional data could be useful and request it — making it seem like the customer has less control of their data than we’d hope. It’s quite the pickle. Nobody seems eager to get this virus, but the amount that we’ve had to give up just to remain safe (though that seems a relative term based on infection/death rates) has already been a big ask.[Image: MikeDotta/Shutterstock]
Join the conversation
5 of 8 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Jul 20, 2020

    Way back in pre 2010, clutching my new Android smartphone, I checked with Google after a few days. It told me how to get to work, even so far as to tell me to turn left out of my driveway. I really didn't need the advice, having covered the route for 25 years. I turned off location, and have wandered blindly ever since, except on vacation outside my province -- first thing I do when I get a new phone is turn off location. Nobody's business but mine. Google thinks I live in Montreal whenever I deign to use the Chrome browser, but I'm 800 miles away. Montreal is where my cellphone provider hangs out. Baruth suggested using DuckDuckGo as my search engine some years ago, and so I do -- no tracking. Young people like my niece seem perfectly happy broadcasting their whereabouts, and since all these creepy companies want to sell what data they gather, I'd say any chance of personal privacy went up the spout years ago. We say we're democratic and those dastardly Chinese spy on their citizens and give them a social rating. If someone can tell me the practical difference between that and the secret way we go about it here with companies handing over their info on us behind our backs, my retort is that the difference lies somewhere between zero and nothing. We just get to bleat we're free.

    • See 2 previous
    • Snooder Snooder on Jul 22, 2020

      The difference is that if you have a bad social credit rating in China, you can't even rent an apartment or buy a train ticket. And you'll regularly get visits from your local office of public security to make sure you're staying in your place. Having corporation trying to sell you protein shakes is uh, not quite that bad. Seriously though the issue isnt the data. It's what is done with it. I dont really care if my data is used to try to sell me shit. I care a lot if my data is used by the govt to curtail where and how I can live my life.

  • Schurkey Schurkey on Jul 21, 2020

    If only "corporations" could go to prison, what a wonderful world this could be.

  • EBFlex This should help Fords quality
  • Analoggrotto By the time any of Hyundai's Japanese competitors were this size and age, they produced iconic vehicles which are now highly desirable and going for good money used. But Hyundai/Kia have nothing to this point that anyone will care about in the future. Those 20k over MSRP Tellurides? Worn out junk sitting at the used car lot, worn beyond their actual age. Hyundai/Kia has not had anything comparable to the significance of CVCC, 240Z, Supra, Celica, AE86, RX-(7), 2000GT, Skyline, GT-R, WRX, Evo, Preludio, CRX, Si, Land Cruiser, NSX etc. All of this in those years where Detroiters and Teutonic prejudiced elitists were openly bashing the Japanese with racist derogatory language. Tiger Woods running off the road in a Genesis didn't open up a moment, and the Genesis Sedan featuring in Inception didn't matter any more than the Lincoln MKS showing up for a moment in Dark Knight. Hyundai/Kia are too busy attempting to re-invent others' history for themselves. But hey, they have to start somewhere and the N74 is very cool looking today in semi rendered pictures. Hyundai/Kia's biggest fans are auto Journalists who for almost 2 decades have been hyping them up to deafening volumes contributing further distrust in any media.
  • Bd2 Other way around.Giorgetto Giugiaro penned the Pony Coupe during the early 1970s and later used its wedge shape as the basis for the M1 and then the DMC-12.The 3G Supra was just one of many Japanese coupes to adopt the wedge shape (actually was one of the later ones).The Mitsubishi Starion, Nissan 300ZX, etc.
  • Tassos I also want one of the idiots who support the ban to explain to me how it will work.Suppose sometime (2035 or later) you cannot buy a new ICE vehicle in the UK.Q1: Will this lead to a ICE fleet resembling that of CUBA, with 100 year old '56 Chevys eventually? (in that case, just calculate the horrible extra pollution due to keeping 100 year old cars on the road)Q2: Will people be able to buy PARTS for their old cars FOREVER?Q3: Will people be allowed to jump across the Channel and buy a nice ICE in France, Germany (who makes the best cars anyway), or any place else that still sells them, and then use it in the UK?
  • Tassos Bans are ridiculous and undemocratic and smell of Middle Ages and the Inquisition. Even 2035 is hardly any better than 2030.The ALMIGHTY CONSUMER should decide, not... CARB, preferably WITHOUT the Government messing with the playing field.And if the usual clueless idiots read this and offer the tired "But Government subsidizes the oil industry too", will they EVER learn that those MINISCULE (compared to the TRILLIONS of $ size of this industry) subsidies were designed to help the SMALL Oil producers defend themselves against the "Big Oil" multinationals. Ask ANY major Oil co CEO and he will gladly tell you that you can take those tiny subsidies and shove them.