By on April 27, 2020

Image: Nissan

Still sidelined by the coronavirus pandemic in North America and suffering from supply chain and demand issues in its Japanese home base, Nissan is prepared to stem domestic output by 70 percent in May, Reuters reports.

The unconfirmed production cut won’t be a single-month affair, either. On this side of the Pacific, it seems Nissan brass want birds of a feather to flock together, with possible changes incoming at the automaker’s two American vehicle assembly plants.

But back to that domestic situation. As demand in Europe and North America dwindles amid severe and widespread lockdown orders, Nissan’s Japanese manufacturing capacity finds itself grossly oversized for the job at hand. Feeding the Japanese market can be accomplished with a fraction of the output. Hoping to avoid a scenario like that seen with Hyundai, documents seen by Reuters show the automaker will cut production by 70 percent in May and 43 percent in June.

Nissan Murano production

In this continent, changes could be afoot at the company’s Mississippi and Tennessee assembly plants. Citing supplier sources, Automotive News claims Nissan wants to move around a couple of models. The Murano would move from its current home at Canton Assembly to Smyrna Assembly, where it would find a place alongside the Rogue and Pathfinder. While the automaker was expected to consolidate Altima production at one site (Canton), sources now say that plan’s on hold due to the unexpected arrival of COVID-19 and all its baggage.

A Nissan spokesperson did not confirm the report, saying only that the company regularly studies a number of scenarios related to production efficiency.

[Image: Nissan]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

4 Comments on “Nissan Looks to Stem the Flow in Japan, Eyes Production Changes in America...”


  • avatar
    Art Vandelay

    Wonder if they are shifting product in anticipation of shutting one down.

  • avatar
    legacygt

    Is this a more engaging drive than a Mazda CX-9? The CX-9 has pros and cons but if you care about a degree of sportiness and engagement, it probably beats the MDX. It’s top trim levels may also be more luxurious for several thousand less. And if all you care about is the drive, you can get a lower trim level for $20K less.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • la834: > “the Bronco II’s main competition coming from General Motors via the S-10 Blazer and S-15 Jimmy....
  • ect: I acquired an ’87 Jeep Cherokee as a company car. It was head and shoulders above the Bronco II.
  • bd2: Kia could have done better if they had more inventory of models like the Telluride (which was vastly outsold by...
  • ect: Ditto, Tim. Reality is that, as I joke with my friends, it’s hard to tell what’s a weekday and...
  • Jeff S: Ok I meant timing chain but either is bad. I believe the design was to save space under the hood. I love the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber