Hottest Cadillac V Models to Carry Blackwing Name, Not Blackwing Engine

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Cadillac has pulled the curtain back on its expanded CT4-V and CT5-V sedan lineup, confirming that the brawnier versions of those performance variants will carry a Blackwing designation.

Designed with track days in mind and available with manual transmissions, the CT4-V and CT5-V Blackwings will offer potent power, just not of the Blackwing variety.

It seems Cadillac still has no use for the twin-cam 4.2-liter Blackwing V8 that served briefly in the now-defunct CT6-V. Instead, Caddy’s turned to larger-displacement, lower-tech fare, massaging the former CTS-V’s supercharged 6.2-liter for CT5-V Blackwing duty. Output remains unconfirmed, which can also be said of the model’s introduction timing.

Lower on the Cadillac totem, the CT4-V Blackwing is expected to carry a twin-turbocharged 3.6-liter V6, much like its ATS-V predecessor.

When Cadillac debuted its new compact and midsize sedans, reaction was muted. The same went for the resulting V-badged models, which seemed too mild to be worthy of the designation. Fear not, Cadillac brass said, more is on the way. It looks like the V family can have more than one member.

Calling the upcoming models “the apex of Cadillac performance and driver engagement,” the brand said the two models eclipsed their predecessors’ lap times during testing at Virginia International Raceway. It was spy photos taken during testing that alerted us to the presence of a burlier brace of Caddys looming in the pipeline.

Besides the upgraded mills, Blackwing variants differ from stock V fare via a specially tuned chassis and vehicle control technologies.

All that said, it’s strange that the name of an in-house engine will end up plastered to the exterior of vehicles that don’t carry it. Not that the 550-horse motor was likely to beat the old 6.2L, rated at 640 hp in CTS-V guise (and likely more in the CT5-V Blackwing).

“The Blackwing name has come to represent the very best of Cadillac performance engineering, craftsmanship and technology,” said Cadillac executive chief engineer Brandon Vivian in a statement. “The new CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing build on the brand’s respected legacy of ultimate-performance driving experiences and elevate them even further.”

Stay tuned for more details as the two Blackwings draw nearer.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • Bd2 Bd2 on Apr 14, 2020

    Despite its issues, Toyota can't keep them in stock (both here and overseas). But that front clip isn't very appealing; rather get the CR-V hybrid.

    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Apr 15, 2020

      I think you got the wrong car, McFly. Now why don't upi make like a tree...and get outta here.

  • Thelaine Thelaine on Apr 15, 2020

    I wonder if Cadillac has been profitable for the last 10 or 15 years. Are Escalade profits enough? Does anything else make money? They seem to waste a lot of money jumping from one thing to the next. Good luck betting the farm on electric cars. More golden parachutes for failed Cadillac execs. Cadillac has spent so much money on so many failed products for such a long period of time I cannot believe they still exist.

  • Clive Most 400 series highways in Canada were designed for 70 MPH using 70 year old cars. The modern cars brake, handle, ride better, and have much better tyres. If people would leave a 2-3 second gap and move to the right when cruising leaving the passing lanes open there would be much better traffic flow. The 401 was designed for a certain amount of traffic units; somewhere in the 300,000 range (1 car = 1 unit 1 semi+trailer =4 units) and was over the limit a few minutes after the 1964 official opening. What most places really need is better transit systems and better city designs to reduce the need for vehicle travel.
  • Kira Interesting article but you guys obviously are in desperate need of an editor and I’d be happy to do the job. Keep in mind that automotive companies continually patent new technologies they’ve researched yet have no intention of developing at the time. Part of it is to defend against competitors, some is a “just in case” measure, and some is to pad resumes of the engineers.
  • Jalop1991 Eh?
  • EBFlex Wow Canada actually doing something decent for a change. What a concept.
  • 3-On-The-Tree To Khory, I was a firefighter as well and the worst thing about car fires was the fumes from all the plastics and rubber, tires etc.
Next