BMW's U.S. Assembly Plant Turns Out the Lights Earlier Than Expected
For a brief while, it looked like BMW’s Spartanburg, SC assembly plant would be the last such factory in the U.S. still in operation. Nope.
The German automaker announced Wednesday that pressures from the coronavirus pandemic have forced its hand, prompting a shutdown scheduled to begin Sunday.
After we told you that Bimmer was the last U.S. car producer not talking about curtailing production, the automaker stated that Spartanburg would go offline from April 3rd to 19th to adjust production volume to anticipated demand. Obviously, that demand took a scalp-level haircut following the arrival of COVID-10 on our shores.
As reported by FOX Carolina, Bimmer has since pushed up the shutdown date. The plant will now go dark for two weeks starting March 29th, coming back online, tentatively, on April 12th.
The automaker cited the earlier-than-expected breakdown in the U.S. supply chain as the reason for the bumped-up timeframe. Like at other automakers, the return-to-work date could be a moving target; BMW claims it will keep a close eye on the situation and adjust its schedule accordingly if things change.
Spartanburg, which built its first vehicle in 1994, cranks out roughly 1,500 vehicles per day, most of them destined for overseas markets. The brand’s South Carolina plant manufactures the X3, X5, and X7 crossovers, as well as their M-badged variants, along with the X4 and X6 “coupes.”
SCE to AUX on Mar 25, 2020
"BMW claims it will keep a close eye on the situation and adjust its schedule accordingly if things change" How about "BMW says..." There is no reason to doubt their statement, as thought they might *not* keep a close eye and adjust accordingly. Nits aside, I'm surprised they are still open, and will be for 4 more days.
Latest Car Reviews
2021 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium Convertible Reader Rental Review – California, Not Quite Dreamin'
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
- FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
- Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
- FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
- TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.