GM Adding Two Shifts At Michigan Plants

by Steph Willems

February 28th, 2020 3:30 PM

Given the disparity between the U.S. and Canadian auto industries, it’s not surprising that Friday started with news of a shift dropped at Fiat Chrysler’s Windsor, Ontario minivan plant and ends with two more added at General Motors facilities just across the border.

GM said today that a shift each will be added to its two Lansing, Michigan assembly plants; one to support a brace of new sedans (this could be the last time anyone writes such a statement), the other to support — what else? — crossover production.

Lansing Grand River Assembly stands to attract another 400 employees to help ramp up production of the Cadillac CT4 and CT5 sedans. The plant’s second shift comes on in the second quarter of the year.

At GM’s Lansing Delta Township Assembly, the Chevrolet Traverse/Buick Enclave line adds a third shift of 800 workers on the same timetable as LGR. Both plants were the recipient of cash infusions topping $200 million over the past couple of years.

For GM’s sake, one hopes the CT4 and CT5 perform better than the incredibly shrinking ATS and CTS that came before. As for the Traverse and Enclave, neither model shows any contraction in the previous year. Despite weathering a fourth-quarter slump, Traverse sales rose an infinitesimal 0.4 percent in 2019, earning the full-size crossover its best annual volume in its 11-year history.

The Enclave, despite selling in significantly smaller numbers than its bowtie brother, fared better in 2019, with volume up 3 percent. That’s the best showing of the model’s current generation, though the previous-gen Enclave regularly topped 2019’s tally. In fact, it did so from 2010 to 2016.

As for the first two months of 2020, GM’s quarterly reporting practices keep us from enjoying the answer to this sales query. Cleary, neither model tanked.

[Image: General Motors]

#BuickEnclave #ChevroletTraverse #Crossovers #Enclave #GeneralMotors #GM #Jobs #LansingDeltaTownship #LansingGrandRiver #Production #Traverse

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 35 comments

Jfk-usaf on Mar 02, 2020

People want quality. GM hasn't figured that out yet. Sit in a $30k something CUV from a Hyundai or Toyota then make your way over to a GM dealer and sit in one at the same price point. You'll immediately see the difference. Look at the performance specs on their engines. Their new Cadillac SUV that looks so much like a Volvo XC90 has two more cylinders and somehow has like 40 less HP and even less Tq. Make a good compelling product and people will buy it from you... Check the new interior of their newly redesigned trucks. doesn't hold a candle to the new Ram let alone the segment leader F-150. Try harder, hire the correct people...

Like Reply
Jfk-usaf on Mar 02, 2020

People want quality. GM hasn't figured that out yet. Sit in a $30k something CUV from a Hyundai or Toyota then make your way over to a GM dealer and sit in one at the same price point. You'll immediately see the difference. Look at the performance specs on their engines. Their new Cadillac SUV that looks so much like a Volvo XC90 has two more cylinders and somehow has like 40 less HP and even less Tq. Make a good compelling product and people will buy it from you... Check the new interior of their newly redesigned trucks. doesn't hold a candle to the new Ram let alone the segment leader F-150. Try harder, hire the correct people...

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Robotdawn on Mar 02, 2020
  
  I've done just exactly that, sat in many different cars/SUVs and test driven them, and I have zero idea what you mean. I don't have any problem with what GM makes at all. I think it's good stuff. I won't argue quality with a Toyota or Honda person, although I hear people complain about their quality lately, they just have too good of a track record. Any other car make I would say GM does fine against. I dislike GM's lack of producing a muscle car, or heck any sporty car, in Chevy trim, but no one is doing that except Dodge in a 30 year old body, so I assume I missed my window with the SS, and that's it.
  
  Like
- Highdesertcat on Mar 02, 2020
  
  "People want quality. GM hasn’t figured that out yet. " Not only is "low or no quality" still a real-world issue for GM today, but GM is just not competitive with other brands in the real world. Take as an example the best selling vehicles in America, pickup trucks, and compare similarly priced 1/2-ton pickup trucks from GM against those of Ford and RAM. GM can't even qualify as an also-ran, not on value, not on quality, and not on price (not even with the huge discounts GM is forced to offer). No wonder that Tundra and Titan exist and continue to sell, albeit in smaller numbers. It's great for GM and the UAW that GM is adding two shifts but maybe that is because GM cut back too much in the past to assist their recovery after they died (and the ensuing aftermath of bailouts and nationalization in 2009).
  
  Like
- DenverMike on Mar 02, 2020
  
  @highdesertcat There's no point in "quality". Everyone at GM knows they wont be working for GM soon, one way or another, Execs to Mop Squeezers.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Denis Jeep have other cars?!?
Darren Mertz In 2000, after reading the glowing reviews from c/d in 1998, I decided that was the car for me (yep, it took me 2 years to make up my mind). I found a 1999 with 24k on the clock at a local Volvo dealership. I think the salesman was more impressed with it than I was. It was everything I had hoped for. Comfortable, stylish, roomy, refined, efficient, flexible, ... I can't think of more superlatives right now but there are likely more. I had that car until just last year at this time. A red light runner t-boned me and my partner who was in the passenger seat. The cops estimate the other driver hit us at about 50 mph - on a city street. My partner wasn't visibly injured (when the seat air bag went off it shoved him out of the way of the intruding car) but his hip was rather tweaked. My car, though, was gone. I cried like a baby when they towed it away. I ruminated for months trying to decide how to replace it. Luckily, we had my 1998 SAAB 9000 as a spare car to use. I decided early on that there would be no new car considered. I loathe touch screens. I'm also not a fan of climate control. Months went by. I decided to keep looking for another B5 Passat. As the author wrote, the B5.5 just looked 'over done'. October this past year I found my Cinderella slipper - an early 2001. Same silver color. Same black leather interior. Same 1.8T engine. Same 5 speed manual transmission. I was happier than a pig in sh!t. But a little sad also. I had replaced my baby. But life goes on. I drive it every day to work which takes me over some rather twisty freeway ramps. I love the light snarel as I charge up some steep hills on my way home. So, I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Passat guy.
Paul Mezhir As awful as the styling was on these cars, they were beautifully assembled and extremely well finished for the day. The doors closed solidly, the ride was extremely quiet and the absence of squeaks and rattles was commendable. As for styling? Everything's beautiful in it's own way.....except for the VI coupe....it's proportions were just odd: the passenger compartment and wheelbase seemed to be way too short, especially compared to the VI sedan. Even the short-lived Town Coupe had much better proportions. None of the fox-body Lincolns could compare to the beautiful proportions of the Mark V.....it was the epitome of long, low, sleek and elegant. The proportions were just about perfect from every angle.
ToolGuy Silhouetting yourself on a ridge like that is an excellent way to get yourself shot ( Skylining)."Don't you know there's a special military operation on?"
ToolGuy When Farley says “like the Millennium Falcon” he means "fully updatable" and "constantly improving" -- it's right there in the Car and Driver article (and makes perfect sense).