Why Are Teens Growing Disinterested in Automobiles?

why are teens growing disinterested in automobiles

When I was an adolescent, it was made clear to me that the first step toward adulthood was getting my driver’s license. Even without an automobile, it provided unimaginable freedoms and brought me closer to my goal of doing a burnout in the high school parking lot. That dream was ultimately achieved, leaving me to rethink roadway safety as my first car was loaded onto a flatbed while the scent of tire smoke and bleach clung to my clothing.

Fortunately, hitching a ride home was easy, as most of my friends had also acquired licenses and cars of their own. But that’s probably not going to be the case for teens coming of driving age in these modern times.

According to the Federal Highway Administration, the percentage of American teenagers bothering to get their licenses has effectively plateaued at a low point. Nearly 48 percent of 16-year-olds in this country could legally drive in 1984; that number settled to just 25.6 percent in 2018. The reasons are more complicated than just the younger generation’s snubbing of the automobile.

A Bloomberg report recently examined the data-faulted restrictions imposed in the 1990s. These included raising the number of “practice hours” those under 18 have to endure (with a guardian) before getting the important slip of paper, minimizing the number of passengers they can carry once they have a license, and rules against driving late at night. Despite walking back teenage freedom to some degree, it’s broadly believed these initiatives helped improve roadway safety by not throwing young drivers into the pool without supervision.

But creating more hoops for teens to jump through may also have discouraged them from rushing out to get their license.

While some of this has simply shifted the age brackets for when younger people decide to pick up their driving certification, trending older, Bloomberg believes it had broader implications on society as a whole:

Still, there are ample indications that the acquisition of driver’s licenses isn’t only being delayed. Licensed drivers’ share of the population has continued to rise as the population ages, but according to transportation researcher Michael Sivak — who has done more than anyone to raise awareness of this shift — members of every age cohort under 45 were less likely to have a license in 2018 than in 1983. Among those ages 25 to 29, 85.7 percent had licenses in 2018, down from 95.6 percent in 1983. Also, Americans in their 30s and 40s used to be much more likely to have licenses than those in their 60s. Now they’re less likely to have them.

Pretty much every group under the age of 50 has seen a smaller percentage of drivers since the 1980s. In 1983, 94.9 percent of adults between 35 and 39 held a valid license. That number dropped to 90.9 percent for 2018. For Americans aged 20 to 24, the figures went from 91.8 to 80.1 percent over the same period.

Urbanization undoubtedly plays a role here. More people live in cities than ever before, and a hefty chunk of them rely on public transportation or ride sharing. However, your author has also convinced himself that the defunding of driver’s education programs has to be similarly relevant. Decades ago, you could practically guarantee the local high school offered some form of driver’s ed.

Unfortunately, liability concerns and a growing focus on college admissions requirements have discouraged many schools from bothering. As a result, vehicular training courses suffered the same fate as shop class. Some teens without parents willing to pay for their education elsewhere will certainly scrounge up the cash for themselves, but there will also be a contingent you’ll have to catch young if you’re going to catch them at all.

[Image: RomanR/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
2 of 58 comments
  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jan 10, 2020

    I can't imagine not having gotten my license on my 16th birthday. Parents both worked and couldn't cart me around to the few activities I could think to amuse myself, and I needed at least a license. I worked summers at Tree Trust, an organization specializing in providing employment to young people for 20 hours per week over the summer, making $5.25 an hour. Over 2 summers, when I was 14 and 15, I earned enough to put myself through driver's ed, and buy a cheap car. I took driver's training 6 months shy of my 15th birthday, got my permit a week after my birthday. Then I was off to the races. I wish I could have had more reliable access to a car in high school so I could have done PSEO courses at the local community college, but I couldn't. Overall, having a license and car has always been a part of my life goal. Then again, I came of driving age 17 years ago.

  • MWolf MWolf on Jan 12, 2020

    Granted, I'm a Millennial, as opposed to the generation that comes after us who seem not to be in a rush to drive (many seem to forget or choose to ignore that the oldest of us are looking down the barrel of the big 40 for birthdays, though I'm not there quite yet!). There were (are) many in my generation who never had an interest in driving, either. Some didn't until later when relying on others or on public transport didn't fit the demands of their job or where they live. To me, there are a few reasons that putting off or avoiding driving has become a thing: For one, it's actually more difficult to get a license and to drive within the restrictions of being underage. When I was starting to drive, you could get a permit at 14, drive with licensed adult riding shotgun. You did this for a year if you didn't opt to take driver's ed. Then you could go in, show your permit, take your practical test, and if you passed, you left with freedom in your pocket. Curfew? Midnight. Nothing else. Just park it by 12:00am so you can wake up for school. Another thing is that cars are expensive to insure, expensive to fix, and they frankly have the personality of a receptionist in a drably lit office who never smiles and wears clothes someone triple her age would enjoy. Even cheap used cars up until the past decade or so had some personality. You could get an older car and learn to work on it. Today? If you want something under a decade old, or 15 years, it's all the same crap. Anything cool from the 90's is either used up and dying, or if it's worth a damn, is being sold for a higher price (nicely preserved American mid-size, mid-market cars from the 90's seem to be selling for at least a few thousand, which some see as too much. Hell, 10 years ago, I already paid that price for them!). What's that leave for cheap first cars? Gee, can't wait to get behind the wheel of that...2010 CR-V/Rav4/Prius/must-bleed-to-feel-alive-when-you-drive-it-borebox...woo. hoo.

  • 01 Deville https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/new/nl-New-Toyota-Sienna-Madison-d308_L39766
  • Lou_BC This would be a good colour for anyone that would actually use their truck offroad, on gravel roads, in the winter or poor visibility situations.
  • EBFlex “getting a full charge in just about three hours or so. Not that it would’ve mattered if I couldn’t charge – I’d just run on gas.”And this folks is why PHEVs are the future and pure EVs will remain vanity products for the rich.
  • Pmirp1 Simple. Electrics are not yet prime time. In time, they may become the norm. For now, they are still the new kid on the block. A curosity. A status symbol. They are not the work horse of American life. Everyone knows that. You buy it because it is fast. It makes you feel like, you know, Prius like 10-15 years ago.Electrics have improved. Tesla is without a doubt the standard bearer. Still, long way to go before they can be your ONE vehicle. So companies charge more because these things are coooool. Not real.
  • Rich Benkwitt I’ll take that red and white 2 door and I guess the 4 banger so I can have the manual tranny just like my 1969 Bronco. I have my Wildtrak on order now waiting impatiently!