Gaming the System? Treasury Department Complains of Unworthy EV Credit Recipients

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Tax credits are a great way to stimulate purchases or participation, and in the politician’s mind, they often take precedence over affordability measures that would benefit broader swathes of society. That being said, they’re here to say… unless you’re referring to the slowly vanishing federal EV tax credit.

Automakers like Tesla and General Motors are already watching their $7,500 credits halve, then halve again, after surpassing the 200,000-vehicle threshold that starts the countdown to a credit phase-out. Now, the Treasury Department is claiming some recipients of the eco stimulus shouldn’t have received it in the first place.

According to Bloomberg (via Automotive News), an audit of tax returns filed over a five year period ending in 2018 revealed thousands of suspect EV claims.

Of the $1.4 billion paid out to roughly 240,000 EV buyers during that period, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration identified 16,510 returns worthy of further scrutiny. Money paid out to that cohort amounted to upwards of $70 million.

So, how exactly did these tax filers get their hands on the supposedly unearned credits? That’s a mystery for now — much of the audit’s juicy details were redacted. Depending on type of vehicle, where the automaker rests in its credit tally, and the vehicle’s battery capacity, recipients stand to gain between $2,500 and $7,500. Full-on EVs get the biggest bucks, but buyers of plug-in hybrids stand to gain a considerable incentive. The credit available to buyers of the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is $5,836. The now-departed Cadillac CT6 Plug-In, being of solid American stock, was eligible for the full $7,500, despite its 2.0-liter turbo.

While the wrongful credit payout remain shrouded behind black ink, the Internal Revenue Service claims it’s on the case, vowing to recoup the money. “Although the IRS has taken steps to address some of TIGTA’s previous recommendations to improve the identification and prevention of erroneous credit claims, many of the deficiencies previously identified still exist,” the audit stated.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Oct 06, 2019

    "The now-departed Cadillac CT6 Plug-In, being of solid American stock, was eligible for the full $7,500, despite its 2.0-liter turbo." Was it not also wholly Chinese?

  • Darex Darex on Oct 07, 2019

    I always find it pretty bogus when a Ford Fusion Energi PHEV has a prized dedicated charging station/parking spot in front of its house, or it's parked at a public EV station. I don't think PHEVs should ever have qualified for any of EV credits.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Oct 07, 2019

      They qualify because there are many times a PHEV car can run long distances on electric power alone, unlike a traditional hybrid. IIRC the PHEV credit is roughly 2/3 or 1/2 of the BEV credits.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next