California Governor Demands Investigation Into High Gas Prices

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Tuesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom responded to a new report claiming oil companies have been overcharging customers over social media.

“[California] drivers have paid an average of 30 cents more per gallon. There’s no identifiable evidence to justify that,” Newsom said. “I’m demanding an investigation. If oil companies are engaging in false advertising or price fixing — legal action should be taken.”

With California leading the charge against the federal government’s proposed fuel economy rollback, Newsom’s words are a bit of a faux pas. While we agree that companies should not be engaging in price fixing, California’s high fuel prices are largely its own doing. Newsom’s claims completely ignore this rather obvious fact — calling his ability to effectively negotiate the national fueling fracas into question.

We weren’t the only ones to notice, either. Twitter users immediately responded to the governor, with many acknowledging that Californians actually pay the highest gas taxes in the whole country (the state surpassed Pennsylvania this summer). Equally bizarre is Newsom’s outspoken support of the state’s 2017 gas tax increase and condemnation of 2018 ballot measure aimed at repealing it. He has to know that’s why fuel prices are so much higher there… right?

The California Energy Commission (CEC) report Newsom referenced was something he commissioned earlier in the year. The goal was to determine why Golden State residents were paying so much more for gas than people in other parts of the country. However, the CEC report determined “the primary cause of the residual price increase is simply that California’s retail gasoline outlets are charging higher prices than those in other states.”

It also outlined how much more Californians are being charged via regulatory measures and fuel taxes. The report estimated that California’s gas prices were $0.75 higher than anywhere else in the country last year, and over half of that appears to be directly attributable to the state’s taxes, low-carbon fuel requirements, and greenhouse cap-and-trade program. The West Coast, which is also subject to higher crude prices than other parts of the country, ran into supply problems this year as local refineries swapped over to special blends not used in other states.

While that doesn’t automatically exonerate Big Oil from the suspected price fixing, it also doesn’t support any accusations against them. Ultimately, this forced Newsom to kick the can down the road to Attorney General Xavier Becerra. The California Energy Commission did the same:

The CEC does not have any evidence that gasoline retailers fixed prices or engaged in false advertising. Moreover, the CEC lacks the expertise to determine whether such behavior occurred. The California Department of Justice is well equipped to conduct an appropriate investigation.

The whole thing is a little confusing. Newsom appears concerned with the high prices Californians have to pay at the pump but completely overlooks the core reasons for the problem. This offers plenty of ammunition to his political opponents in the gas war, especially with the Environmental Protection Agency repeatedly accusing the state of being mismanaged — and creating new ecological issues while failing to effectively address existing ones. At least, that’s how EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler tells it.

At this point, we don’t expect either side to play fair and take anything at face value. Still, this will be a black eye for California, and it could have been avoided entirely if state leadership bothered to address why we need fuel taxes, or if it promised to tamp them down in the future. Instead, the governor responded to public complaints of high fuel prices by pointing the finger at Big Oil with no proof.

[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 82 comments
  • IBx1 IBx1 on Oct 25, 2019

    hahahahhahaha Oh wait, he's serious, let me laugh even harder HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

  • -Nate -Nate on Oct 26, 2019

    "asking why they charged so much more. All the owners had the same response, “Because we can”. " "Gas price collusion has been investigated on and off for 45 years, with no evidence of it." " Raising the price only drives customers away." .....Followed by the usual alt right whiners who envy California and so take any opportunity to lambast it and take childish dishonest pot shots instead of being grateful that Californians all pay more Federal taxes to prop up the bankrupt red states.... In reality, the gasoline prices are only excessive because the gop deregulated the pricing, that's it . True in the 1970's when they did it, claiming it would make all fuels cheaper, almost free ! (like electricity and insurance, remember ? of course you don't, the truth scares you witless) . If you're envious of the substantially better life we have in California, stop whining and LEAVE then S.T.F.U. and enjoy your miserable bankrupt red states poverty life . -Nate

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X When I learned of the Kei trucks, particularly the Subaru Sambar, it was compelling, but too risky and costly in the end. My local Subaru dealer wouldn't support it.
  • MrIcky Having worked several catastrophes for insurance, the following "The bottom line is that if the insurance agency can find ways not to cover the car, they probably won’t." just isn't the way it works. The insurance company will have some drop off areas where cars will be brought. The adjuster will check for water height and draw a line at the high water point with a posca marker. If that line is generally over the electronics- bam, it's totaled, if you have comprehensive they look up your car on KBB and/or NADA by mileage and write a check. Most comprehensive vehicle policies look almost exactly the same-at least for "standard" carriers. If the water line isn't over the electronics, then it generally goes to a shop to get tested. You aren't going to get gamed for a car in a cat loss scenario because there just isn't time to f'with it. After a Houston flooding event I worked 16 hour days for 2 weeks under a big tent like you'd set up for a wedding and went over nearly 100 cars/day taking pictures and sorting them into total or check with mechanic "piles". Most people who had totaled vehicles had a check within 20 minutes of me looking at their car. Buildings on the other hand have all sorts of different terms (commercial or consumer) with regard to how the wind or water entered your building and whether coverage applies.
  • Theflyersfan Well, Milton just went from a tropical storm to 175mph in less than a day so this guy means business. Even if it weakens a little bit, it'll expand and pretty much all of Florida south of Jacksonville is going to feel something. Everyone who saw that disaster in the NC/VA/TN mountains before Helene's landfall is either from the future or a liar (and that includes the insurance companies) because heavy rain started well before the storm arrived and then the crazy thing just sat in that general area. My part of Kentucky - it didn't stop raining for almost five days. And now this nuclear bomb of a hurricane. I understand Florida has a high percentage of homeowners without insurance because they can no longer afford it. My parents have a home near Naples and they carry extra flood and wind coverage and that costs well over five digits per year. Home renovations about 8-9 years ago gave them the chance to make hurricane-proof changes like lashing the roof and hurricane windows. It survived the direct hit from Irma and the heavy punch from Ian so they worked. After this storm, I don't know how Florida will totally recover. Much like California and the earthquakes and firestorms, there might have to be a "Come to Jesus" talk with the perils of living in Florida. I'm already making plans to head down there post-storm if the roads or airport is open in the days following landfall to help cleanup and rebuild any part of the home that might need it. In the short term, if it hasn't happened already, gas prices are probably going to rocket upwards as the oil rigs in the Gulf shut down and prepare. And if this storm directly hits Tampa/St Pete, it's going to be game over in those cities for a while. And imagine if the storm at this power was aiming towards New Orleans or Miami.
  • Jalop1991 "...leaving Doherty and his passenger to be pulled from the wreck by passersby." Or not. I would get a HUGE laugh out of seeing a video of passersby with their phones whipped out, recording it and doing nothing else.
  • Jalop1991 Hey, as soon as the water drains Stellantis will have lots of empty dealer lots to stash their cars on.
Next