Automakers Sweating After China Announces 25-percent Tariff on U.S. Autos

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The trade war between the United States and China heated up again Friday, with the People’s Republic pulling a U-turn on its treatment of U.S.-built vehicles. Come mid-December, China will hit inbound U.S. vehicles with a 25-percent tariff. Auto parts will see a 5-percent tariff.

The new — well, resurrected — auto tariffs are a reactionary measure, coming after U.S. President Donald Trump proposed, then delayed, the levying of a 10-percent tariff on $300 billion of Chinese goods. While some import taxes will hit in September, the full range of tariffs is expected to come into effect on December 15th. China’s auto tariffs, first levied last year and lifted earlier this year as an olive branch gesture, are part of a larger raft of tariffs impacting $75 billion of U.S. goods. A 5- to 10-percent tariff hits non-auto U.S. goods on September 1st.

It’s no wonder every automaker wants to build Chinese-market vehicles within that country’s borders.

In announcing the looming tariffs, China’s Finance Ministry stated that Trump’s trade threats were “seriously threatening the multilateral trading system.”

“China was forced to take countermeasures,” it added.

China’s tariff relaxation saw the country’s original 15-percent tariff remain in place as the two countries pursued trade negotiations. A July meeting between both sides didn’t bear much in the way of fruit. Still, talks are apparently still on track to resume in September, according to the White House.

While automakers like General Motors and Ford do big business in the now-rocky Chinese marketplace, many of those vehicles roll out of joint-venture assembly plants in China. (Ford plans to up its presence in that market with more locally built Lincolns.) Foreign automakers with a large manufacturing footprint in the U.S. stand to bear the brunt of the proposed tariffs, and this morning their stocks reflected it.

BMW’s stock sank more than 2 percent in Friday trading as the news hit, while Daimler AG took a similar hit before rebounding slightly. As Bloomberg notes, data from LMC Automotive shows that six of the U.S.’s top 10 auto exports hail from those two companies. Tesla, which is currently in the process of building an assembly plant in Shanghai while funnelling cars to Chinese customers via California, saw its stock fall more than 2 percent.

Trump seemed unfazed by China’s actions, taking to Twitter to rail against the country’s economic influence in a series of messages we’ll post in sequence here:

“Our Country has lost, stupidly, Trillions of Dollars with China over many years. They have stolen our Intellectual Property at a rate of Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year, & they want to continue. I won’t let that happen! We don’t need China and, frankly, would be far..

“..better off without them. The vast amounts of money made and stolen by China from the United States, year after year, for decades, will and must STOP. Our great American companies are hereby ordered to immediately start looking for an alternative to China, including bringing..your companies HOME and making your products in the USA. I will be responding to China’s Tariffs this afternoon. This is a GREAT opportunity for the United States. Also, I am ordering all carriers, including Fed Ex, Amazon, UPS and the Post Office, to SEARCH FOR & REFUSE,….

“…all deliveries of Fentanyl from China (or anywhere else!). Fentanyl kills 100,000 Americans a year. President Xi said this would stop – it didn’t. Our Economy, because of our gains in the last 2 1/2 years, is MUCH larger than that of China. We will keep it that way!”

[Sources: MarketWatch, BBC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 222 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 25, 2019

    China is fxxked up and is terminally ill. We know about it and they know about it. Chinese economy is the house of cards. It's just matter of time when all that shaky construction comes downs. Capitalist economy is not compatible with communist political system. What's happening in Hong Kong is just beginning. It will spread out to the rest of country. It is similar to what happened with Warsaw pact after Solidarnost movement started in Poland. Chinese rulers think that they can wait out Trump and after Dems take power (as if) they will manipulate them like puppets. But time is not on their side, contrary to that - it is against them. Russians communists also thought they can wait out Reagan but system crumbled down much sooner.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 26, 2019

    China will wait it out regardless if they are Communist or not. China is not like Russia or even the West. The Chinese do not have the same concept of time as we have they were in isolation from the rest of the World for centuries by choice. As for Hong Kong it is likely that the Chinese will bring in the military to squash the rebellion. Our only chance with China is to not alienate our allies and together as a united force we negotiate with the Chinese on theft of intellectual property and on Hong Kong but do it in such a way that it gives China a way to save face. China will walk away from any negotiations if they feel they are shamed. Verbal and tweet attacks will not bring China to negotiations.

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Aug 28, 2019

      100% correct. A journalist asked an exiled democracy protester shortly after the Tienanmen Square massacre if he was discouraged. "No," he said, "I think democracy will come to China." When? asked the interviewer. "Very soon," he replied brightly, "maybe 100 years." Their time horizon isn't ours. They're playing the long game. If they must, they can wait out this president, and the next, and the next. And yes: with an economy that large and growing larger, it will take a united multilateral front standing against their unfair practices, not just a single country with a mercurial leader who destroys his own international alliances. And yes: they must be able to save face, not bow down to some narcissist who must be told he's won or it's no deal. Too many painful colonial memories to do it any other way. 100% correct.

  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
  • Keith Most of the stanced VAGS with roof racks are nuisance drivers in my area. Very likely this one's been driven hard. And that silly roof rack is extra $'s, likely at full retail lol. Reminds me of the guys back in the late 20th century would put in their ads that the installed aftermarket stereo would be a negotiated extra. Were they going to go find and reinstall that old Delco if you didn't want the Kraco/Jenson set up they hacked in?
Next