Raptor Meets Godzilla?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Ford’s F-150 Raptor represents the pinnacle of off-road performance for adventurous full-size truck buyers — it’s a vehicle capable of blasting through brush (not that you would) with its extra-wide stance and enlarged fenders, running full-bore across the backcountry with the 450 horsepower and 510 lb-ft of torque on tap from its high-output 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, and sticking bone-crushing landings with the help of its long-legged suspension.

And still buyers wish for more. According to one report, the Raptor could be due for an engine upgrade that puts the correct number of cylinders beneath the hood.

As claimed by insider sources who spoke to Ford Authority, the boys and girls at the Blue Oval are in the midst of testing a Raptor outfitted with a V8 engine. The engine would serve in a high-performance variant of the already high-performance truck. If true, this would represent something of a return to tradition for the model, as the first-generation Raptor employed a 6.2-liter V8 for motivation.

Twin-turbo sixes are nice, but the 3.0-liter unit found in the 2020 Explorer ST makes 400 hp and 415 lb-ft. The hybrid Lincoln Aviator promises that engine, plus 450 hp and 600 lb-ft. Lesser engines are beginning to take some of the shine off the Raptor’s 3.5L EcoBoost.

It could just be an experiment, but when it comes to V8s Ford now has a bevy of choices. Why not make maximum use of them?

Rumors abound that the Raptor will soon adopt the supercharged 5.2-liter Voodoo V8 found in the upcoming Mustang Shelby GT500, said to make north of 700 hp. That could still be the case. However, there’s an alternative that doesn’t have to work as hard: Ford’s naturally aspirated, pushrod 7.3-liter “ Godzilla” engine (seen above), built at a newly upgraded plant in Windsor, Ontario.

Destined for the 2020 Super Duty line, the engine boasts relatively compact dimensions and is said by Ford spokesman Mike Levine to be compatible with both the Mustang and Raptor. Power, for now, remains a mystery, though Ford claims the big-bore mill will outmuscle all other gas V8s in its class.

It would seem that the Godzilla is better suited to moving considerable mass in a hurry, though the Voodoo rumors can’t be dismissed just yet. Time will tell what Ford decides to do with its brawniest truck.

[Images: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Garrett Garrett on Jun 12, 2019

    (Reposting due to getting caught in the filter) Ugh. I have literally never observed a vehicle that is so universally driven so poorly and in such an ahole-ish manner as the Ford Raptor. I honestly cannot think of a single unmodified vehicle I’ve ever be in favor of banning, but the Ford Raptor makes me question that view. Perhaps some day I will see one that doesn’t cut someone off, doesn’t tailgate someone already doing 20mph over the limit, or who doesn’t use their accessory lights to blind someone. I won’t hold my breath.

    • 0Gravity 0Gravity on Jun 13, 2019

      Agreed. It's basic human behavior. A macho aggressive truck attracts macho aggressive aholes. Most are also in debt up to their eyeballs for a vehicle that spends all of its time on pavement going from the suburbs to the office park. That fancy Fox suspension occasionally sees a pothole, maybe.

  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Jun 13, 2019

    If I was looking to buy a Raptor, the only way Ford would get my money is if I could get an NA V8 in it. I want nothing to do with any EB garbage motors. Well, unless Ford started covering them for 100,000 miles or 10 years.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next