Lordstown Long Shot? Skepticism Greets GM-Workhorse Talks

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Yesterday’s news that General Motors is in talks to sell its mothballed Lordstown assembly plant to an affiliate of Cincinnati’s Workhorse Group was met with surprise and no shortage of doubt.

For starters, the company ended last year with 98 employees. It’s still a fledgling startup, eager to sell a range-extended light duty pickup alongside its electric step vans, some of which have found a home with UPS. Workhorse is chasing larger game, however, throwing its hat in the ring for the U.S. Postal Service’s lucrative next-generation van contract. Most observers believe Workhorse’s acquisition of the Lordstown plant hinges on securing that contract.

“We have a long way to go,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine told The Youngstown Vindicator following GM’s announcement, which followed a revealing tweet by President Donald Trump. “Cautious is probably the right word.”

According to GM, an “affiliated entity” led by Workhorse founder Steve Burns would acquire the facility, with Workhorse Group holding a minority stake.

“The first vehicle we would plan to build if we were to purchase the Lordstown Complex would be a commercial electric pickup, blending Workhorse’s technology with Lordstown’s manufacturing expertise,” Burns said.

A commercial pickup, in this case Workhorse’s W-15 extended-range truck, is not a step van. The company hopes to become the winning entry in the USPS’ Grumman LLV replacement program with a van based on its W88 chassis, offered as a 100-mile fully electric version or a range-extended model utilizing a three-cylinder BMW powerplant as a generator. That’s the same setup employed by the W-15.

There’s no shortage of competition for that contract.

“The development of the pickup will leverage the R&D performed for the USPS award, greatly accelerating the production process,” the company stated in a 2017 presentation.

Lordstown Assembly once held three shifts of workers building the Chevrolet Cruze before falling sales thinned its ranks. The plant’s footprint is 6.2 million square feet, greatly exceeding Workhorse’s current 300,000 square feet of production space. Only a huge contract, backed up by a lot of capital, could turn Lordstown into a Workhorse plant.

“It’s not the day to celebrate yet for the Mahoning Valley or Lordstown or the workers,” DeWine said. “For this really to work, it’s going to be important for Workhorse to get the contract with the postal service.”

Workhorse has never been profitable; the company’s 2018 finances reveal sales of $763,173, expenditures of $21.8 million, and $1.5 million in available cash (per NBC affiliate WKYC). In January, Workhorse secured $35 million in financing from Marathon Asset Management, a move Seeking Alpha called “effectively another last-ditch effort to avoid bankruptcy.”

Dave Green, the UAW Local 1112 president who represented Lordstown workers, didn’t know what to make of the development, saying, “It’s really too soon to say how it will affect our members.”

The nature — and financial resources — of Workhorse’s affiliated entity is unknown at this point. Despite that, as well as the still-undecided nature of the U.S. Postal Service contract, Workhorse’s stock (WKHS) rose 214 percent yesterday, closing at $2.65.

[Image: Corey Lewis/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 43 comments
  • James Charles James Charles on May 10, 2019

    I believe an electric work truck makes a lot of sense if priced competitively. At the moment they are not competitive for the average trades person. I do believe that an EV truck or van with the current EV range has a much wider market than most believe. Most carpenters, plumbers, etc really don't do many miles a day as most work locally. Pickups need to move back to where they were, simple affordable tools. The problem here is most are empty, tow nothing middle class pose wagons. How big is the market, the mass market for this type of vehicle? This question makes you ask how many manufacturers can this limited market support? I know some will say look at GM, Frod, FCA and the Asians, Germans etc. But look at the cost of their conventional powered pickups. Diesel should be the transitioning energy for larger vehicles as we move towards EV work trucks. So, rather than trying to market a high end vehicle this vehicle needs to be a bare as bones to reduce entry costs.

    • James Charles James Charles on May 10, 2019

      Oh, I don't foresee this venture as rosy as D Thump. Not many people are required for this R&D venture.

  • Buickman Buickman on May 11, 2019

    I don't read wordy posts. get to the point or stay home.

  • ChristianWimmer I have two problems with autonomous cars.One, I LOVE and ENJOY DRIVING. It’s a fun and pleasurable experience for me. I want to drive my cars, not be driven by them.Two, if autonomous cars have been engineered to a standard where they work 100% flawlessly and don’t cause accidents, then freedom-hating governments like the POS European Union or totally idiotic current German government can literally make laws which ban private car ownership in their quest to save the world from climate change bla bla bla…
  • SCE to AUX Everything in me says 'no', but the price is tempting, and it's only 2 hours from me.I guess 123k miles in 18 years does qualify as 'low miles'.
  • Dwford Will we ever actually have autonomous vehicles? Right now we have limited consumer grade systems that require constant human attention, or we have commercial grade systems that still rely on remote operators and teams of chase vehicles. Aside from Tesla's FSD, all these systems work only in certain cities or highway routes. A common problem still remains: the system's ability to see and react correctly to obstacles. Until that is solved, count me out. Yes, I could also react incorrectly, but at least the is me taking my fate into my own hands, instead of me screaming in terror as the autonomous vehicles rams me into a parked semi
  • Sayahh I do not know how my car will respond to the trolley problem, but I will be held liable whatever it chooses to do or not do. When technology has reached Star Trek's Data's level of intelligence, I will trust it, so long as it has a moral/ethic/empathy chip/subroutine; I would not trust his brother Lore driving/controlling my car. Until then, I will drive it myself until I no longer can, at which time I will call a friend, a cab or a ride-share service.
  • Daniel J Cx-5 lol. It's why we have one. I love hybrids but the engine in the RAV4 is just loud and obnoxious when it fires up.
Next