Fiat Chrysler Chairman to Nissan, Mitsubishi: Who's Up for a Four-way?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Perhaps sensing that Nissan and its alliance partner, Mitsubishi, feel like third wheels in the romancing of Renault by a merger-happy Fiat Chrysler, FCA Chairman John Elkann had kind words for the pair.

You’re appreciated. You’re valued. And you’re invited to the party.

In a statement sent to Japan’s Nikkei Asian Review on Tuesday, Elkann threw his arms around the two Japanese automakers, promising great things ahead if Renault decides to hook up with his company in a 50:50 merger.

“I have huge respect for Nissan and Mitsubishi, and their products and businesses,” Elkann wrote. “Our proposed merger with Renault will create the potential to build a global partnership with all three of these great companies during this period of unprecedented transformation in our industry.”

For Nissan, which has long felt that Renault is leading the dance, the merger talk comes at a time of financial hardship. Late last year, Nissan’s board of directors was compelled to drop Carlos Ghosn as chairman following his Tokyo arrest — the product of Nissan’s own internal investigation — on charges relating to financial misconduct. Earlier this month, the company’s CEO declared that his company had reached “rock bottom” — a statement backed up by the release of the previous year’s earnings report. That report showed a 45-percent drop in profits, with the current year expected to yield another 28-percent drop.

While a merger would halve Nissan’s 15-percent stake in partner Renault and perhaps reduce its influence over foreign decisions even more, Elkann said there’s room for everyone. By creating the world’s third-largest automaker, FCA aims to realize $5.6 billion in annual efficiencies. The Italian-American automaker would also gain platforms (useful small-car platforms, mainly), and electric vehicle technology its North America-centered lineup generally lacks.

“Our proposal to Renault is one we believe will be transformative in many positive ways,” Elkann wrote. “By proposing a business combination with Renault, our spirit is one of finding a common purpose that provides benefits for all our companies, embracing Nissan and Mitsubishi as valued and respected partners.”

For its part, Renault says it is studying FCA’s proposition “with interest.”

Arriving in Tokyo Tuesday for a meeting of alliance members, Renault CEO Thierry Bollore said he planned to discuss “all possibilities” related to the merger.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • Steve203 Steve203 on May 29, 2019

    “By proposing a business combination with Renault, our spirit is one of finding a common purpose that provides benefits for all our companies, embracing Nissan and Mitsubishi as valued and respected partners.” Doomed by his own statements. He admits that Nissan and Mitsu are affiliates of Renault, which means you need to add Nissan and Mitsu's market shares to that of FCA during anti-trust scrutiny, which makes the combine larger in the US than GM. Not going to fly in DC. This merger is the most obviously doomed that I have seen since the late 90s, when Staples, the #1 big box office supply store, tried to merge with Office Depot, the #2 big box office supply store. Anti-trust authorities blocked that one too.

  • Akear Akear on May 29, 2019

    The sad truth is that the French automakers maybe in better shape than their US counterparts. PSA has already made Opel profitable, and Nissan has surpassed GM in world sales a few years ago.

    • See 1 previous
    • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on May 30, 2019

      @Lorenzo Do you think the US government doesn't know that FCA is an Italian company with headquarters in London and Amsterdam? It doesn't matter one fantastical bit what the US government thinks of this merger.

  • TheEndlessEnigma Of course they should unionize. US based automotive production component production and auto assembly plants with unionized memberships produce the highest quality products in the automotive sector. Just look at the high quality products produced by GM, Ford and Chrysler!
  • Redapple2 Got cha. No big.
  • Theflyersfan The wheel and tire combo is tragic and the "M Stripe" has to go, but overall, this one is a keeper. Provided the mileage isn't 300,000 and the service records don't read like a horror novel, this could be one of the last (almost) unmodified E34s out there that isn't rotting in a barn. I can see this ad being taken down quickly due to someone taking the chance. Recently had some good finds here. Which means Monday, we'll see a 1999 Honda Civic with falling off body mods from Pep Boys, a rusted fart can, Honda Rot with bad paint, 400,000 miles, and a biohazard interior, all for the unrealistic price of $10,000.
  • Theflyersfan Expect a press report about an expansion of VW's Mexican plant any day now. I'm all for worker's rights to get the best (and fair) wages and benefits possible, but didn't VW, and for that matter many of the Asian and European carmaker plants in the south, already have as good of, if not better wages already? This can drive a wedge in those plants and this might be a case of be careful what you wish for.
  • Jkross22 When I think about products that I buy that are of the highest quality or are of great value, I have no idea if they are made as a whole or in parts by unionized employees. As a customer, that's really all I care about. When I think about services I receive from unionized and non-unionized employees, it varies from C- to F levels of service. Will unionizing make the cars better or worse?
Next