Feds Pull a U-turn on Mandatory Brake-Throttle Override

feds pull a u turn on mandatory brake throttle override

A decade after a well-publicized fatal crash involving a Lexus ES 350, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has withdrawn a proposal calling for mandatory brake-throttle override systems.

The NHTSA proposed the regulation after several incidents involving Toyota vehicles with jammed accelerator pedals, but now the federal agency says it’s no longer needed. Automakers responded in the absence of a hard rule, eventually equipping all vehicles with the feature. Problem solved?

Not so fast, say safety advocates.

Following the 2012 proposal, automakers equipped new vehicles with a system that allowed motorists to stop their car if the accelerator becomes jammed by a loose carpet or mismatched floor mat — the determined cause of those Toyota incidents. If both the throttle and brake are depressed at the same time, the system cuts power. On Monday, the NHTSA claimed that, as of 2018, all vehicles contained the feature.

The agency “does not find that there is presently a safety need for a BTO (brake-throttle override) requirement,” the NHTSA said in a statement.

In August 2009, a loaned Lexus ES 350 driven by an off-duty California Highway Patrol officer crashed after the vehicle’s floor mat pinned the accelerator, killing all four occupants. Toyota ultimately recalled over 10 million vehicles and paid a $1.2 billion fine for the “unintended acceleration” controversy.

News of the rule withdrawal was met with approval from the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Spokeswoman Gloria Bergquist told Reuters,“When the technology is in widespread use now, there is no need to continue a rulemaking.”

Jason Levine, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, counters Bergquist’s claim, saying a rule is needed to keep things this way. While the NHTSA says it doesn’t expect automakers to strip their vehicles of BTO systems, he wants assurance.

“With no requirement, the control system can disappear from future models or be sold as a luxury with no recourse for consumers,” Levine said.

Another drawback from the agency’s U-turn? There won’t be a requirement for specific braking distances with BTO systems. A proposed “return to idle” requirement, which would mandate that a vehicle do just that after a driver stops pressing on the accelerator, is also in limbo.

The NHTSA stated that a “broader understanding of safe design of vehicle electronic control systems is needed to make an informed decision on regulating return-to-idle,” adding that “substantial challenges” exist in designing tests for BTO systems.

[Sources: Reuters, The Associated Press] [Image: Toyota]

Join the conversation
2 of 53 comments
  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on May 14, 2019

    The "safety advocates" have completely beclowned themselves on this, while trying to ride the publicity crest. And it's not like we don't have real safety issues to address.

  • Lawyer Applegate Lawyer Applegate on May 15, 2019


  • THX1136 Agree with SCE, the cost alone puts me out of the equation. Would I like an EV Charger, sure but see previous sentence.
  • IBx1 The only thing that stops a bad guy with a [Milwaukee Sawzall for stealing catalytic converters] is a good guy with a [Hydrochloric Acid 37%].
  • SCE to AUX Well, this is one reason to go electric.
  • THX1136 According to carbrain.com the cost for catalytic converter 'repair' is between $945 and $2475. They claim the converter cost itself can be up to $2250. Figuring $880 a unit doesn't seem too far out of line if the carbrain info is accurate. Wonder if gas theft is still going strong on the west coast also?
  • KOKing I'm not sure what to make of the small commercial van market in the US. There are a fair number of Transit Connects and ProMasterCitys, but Nissan/Chevy dumped the NV200 even though they seemed to sell well (though I guess Nissan decided to get out of the commercial space entirely), and I don't think Stellrysler ever bothered C/V-ing the Pacifica.