Duramax Deferral: Emissions Delay Punts Straight-six GM Diesel to 2020 Model Year

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors’ new Flint-built, light-duty 3.0-liter inline-six turbo-diesel won’t be a late-year addition to the company’s full-size pickup lineup, after all.

Apparently, the engine’s emissions certification process was not the speedy affair GM had hoped for. Customers will now have to wait for the 2020 model year before getting their hands on the 460 lb-ft oil burner.

The news comes by way of Automotive News, which got its hands on a memo sent to dealers Tuesday. As a result of a “slight delay” in the Environmental Protection Agency’s emissions certification process, dealers must now cancel and resubmit their orders, the memo said.

Production of diesel 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 models should begin “soon,” the automaker said.

Since Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal in 2015, the EPA has taken a more rigorous approach to vetting diesel powerplants, leading to delays in certification. Fiat Chrysler’s EcoDiesel affair certainly didn’t help the EPA’s paranoia, either. The same situation is occurring overseas, where certain German product launches ran into unexpected delays as a result of the slower process.

With its new 3.0L Duramax, GM hopes to best a Detroit rival in light-duty diesel performance. Ford launched its 3.0L Power Stroke diesel for the 2018 model year and, while the Duramax powerplant bests it in terms of output (277 hp and 460 lb-ft, versus Ford’s 250 hp and 440 lb-ft), the GM engine’s fuel economy and towing figures remain unknown.

The automaker claims drivers will see 95 percent torque output at 1,250 rpm, with peak torque coming online at 1,500 rpm and staying until 3,000 rpm. Like the Ford, the only transmission available with the new GM diesel is a 10-speed automatic.

By adding an available diesel across multiple trims, GM hopes to boost the average transaction price of its new-generation pickups even further. Last quarter, the company said full-size ATPs were $8,040 higher than than of the old-gen pickup in the same quarter a year earlier. Helping the figure, of course, was the fact that full production of Silverado and Sierra regular and double cabs didn’t start until March.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on May 22, 2019

    I think the diesel is cool, but do they expect to sell many of these? I've seen exactly *one* F-150 with the 3.0l Power Stroke, and it was a King Ranch. I do see a fair number of RAM 1500 EcoDiesels, but still maybe less than five percent (heck, maybe one percent) of the RAM 1500s I see.

    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on May 22, 2019

      "Multiple Trim Levels" will help. Many of the other brands restrict the trim levels available with the diesel.

  • Oberkanone Oberkanone on May 22, 2019

    EPA is justifying the delay how? What is the amount of time required for certification? Fail on the part of EPA.

  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Next