Feds Jump in to Investigate Two Fatal Tesla Crashes

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Two fatal Tesla crashes in Florida last week, one of which bears a striking similarity to an earlier 2016 crash, have the NHTSA and NTSB on their toes.

While both federal safety agencies are looking into Friday’s West Delray, Florida collision, which involved a Model 3 and transport truck, only the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is probing the previous Sunday’s Davie, Florida crash. Both groups want to know if Autopilot was turned on at the time of impact.

Running through the list of NHTSA-investigated Tesla crashes would be exhausting. Here’s one example of a recent, non-fatal collision.

The role of the NHTSA is to initiate a recall if a vehicle contains a defect, while the National Transportation Safety Board makes safety recommendations. Investigative teams from both groups hope to discover whether the Model 3 driven by 50-year-old Jeremy Beren Banner had Autopilot’s semi-autonomous features activated when it drove under a semi trailer on Florida’s State Road 7.

According to the S outh Florida Sun-Sentinel, citing a Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office report, “the tractor-trailer was making a left turn onto a divided highway to head north when the southbound 2018 Tesla Model 3 hit the semi’s driver side, tearing off the Tesla’s roof as it passed under the trailer.”

The roofless Tesla came to rest three-tenths of a mile beyond the trailer, the report states. Banner died at the scene.

While a cause of the crash is not yet known, the collision sounds nearly identical to that which claimed the life of Joshua Brown on a Florida highway in 2016. Brown’s Model S, operating on Autopilot at the time, was apparently confused by the sunlight reflecting off the side of the white trailer and did not register it as an obstacle to be avoided. The Tesla drove under the trailer, losing its roof in the process.

That crash was billed as the first to occur in a “self-driving” car (while not a true autonomous vehicle, Brown’s Model S was driving itself at the time of the accident, even if its in-car technology wasn’t fully up to the task). In its wake, Tesla hardened its safety message, warning drivers to stay alert and ready to intervene when using Autopilot. Many still don’t, preferring to place boundless faith in the company’s driver-assist features.

The first of last week’s fatal Tesla crashes, this one also under investigation by the NHTSA, saw a 2016 Model S leave the road and hit a tree, erupting in flames. The Sun-Sentinel reports witnesses seeing the Tesla speeding before the crash, perhaps hitting 75 to 90 mph. Driver Omar Awan, 48, was an anesthesiologist and father of five.

Like in the later crash, it isn’t known whether Awan’s Tesla was operating in Autopilot mode. Mainly, the NHTSA wants to know more about the post-crash fire, which is something seen in several other serious Tesla crashes. It was reported that Awan’s Tesla reignited multiple times in the tow yard.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Downunder Downunder on Mar 05, 2019

    Seeing that everybody is debating the merits and/or failures of the Tesla's "Auto-Pilot" mode, this only goes to show that the average human being, once given the means, to disavow themselves of any responsibility. I know that is this forum, some of us do enjoy the driving skills, plus appreciate what technology can do for us to relieve some of our burdens. But on the other hand the people who throw their hands up in the air, figuratively and possibly for real(!), are going to kill it for everybody, because the next step will be to ban all steering, braking and avoidance aids until total vehicle to vehicle communications is a reality and driving by hand will be reserved for the back blocks. The biggest problem in all of these "auto-pilot" accidents, is that the bloody wingnut that attached itself to the steering wheel and the road safety authorities which allows drivers to access a new system of control without having some kind of knowledge and safety check of the operator. Even a machine operator must demonstrate that they are competent to use a new class of equipment and they understand all the new feature.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Mar 05, 2019

      This is why drivers must agree to be attentive before enabling Autopilot. They have to push the button, and that absolves Tesla. Not to mention the fact that it's only a Level 2 system. Drivers know what they are getting into.

  • JimC2 JimC2 on Mar 05, 2019

    Ahhh, pulling out into fast traffic is a very Florida driver move. It happens all the time and Tallahassee's way of dealing with it is for FLDOT to build never-ending traffic lights while the FHP pretty much runs radar nowhere near the driveways where these rubes blissfully pull out or the intersections where they run stop signs. It's pretty common knowledge if you live in Florida for a few years, even more so for motorcycle riders. I'm not sure if the state of the art of AI, let alone the software in the Tesla autopilot, is capable of dealing with Florida drivers. It's more than just anticipating bad moves, more like assuming that the next guy has no sense of self-preservation and you need a sort of offensive driving algorithm to deal with it.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next