Bill Ford: Ford's Mustang-inspired EV to 'Go Like Hell'

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford’s upcoming EV is a contentious model, despite how little we know about it. Intended to help bring the automaker into the brave new world of electromobility, it also leans upon the brand’s heritage by being a “Mustang-inspired” performance crossover. Whether you’re totally behind the idea or want to stand directly in its path in a Tiananmen-style showdown, its existence will change the company at least as much as axing its traditional car lineup will.

Like most automakers, Ford wants a lineup that hosts plenty of electrics. It knows it has to come out of the gate with a winner. But the car saddled with that responsibility has already faced some problems. Early reports indicating the vehicle would carry the “ Mach 1” name led to mass wailing from Mustang fans. While Ford temporarily dialed back the pony car associations, marketing tactics eventually shifted back toward getting the public riled up about the upcoming model’s performance.

Bill Ford, the automaker’s executive chairman and great-grandson of Henry Ford, was even getting in on the action while speaking at the Crain’s Detroit Business Newsmaker of the Year event earlier this week. According to Automotive News, he said the new EV “is going to go like hell.”

It’s a relatively famous and carefully chosen phrase. Back in the Swinging Sixties, Henry Ford II and some of the most famous names in automotive history joined forces in an attempt to unseat Ferrari’s at the 24 Hours of Le Mans. At the time, the very idea seemed ludicrous. Ferrari had enjoyed five years of dominance in France and Ford was an unproven upstart. But, with some encouragement from Henry II telling Shelby-American to “go like hell,” Ford’s GT40 trounced Europe’s best in 1966.

Dusting off the old quote highlights this dichotomy of past and future that Ford seems fixated on. But it’s rather fitting to hear Bill quote his uncle. In the world of electric vehicles, Ford is viewed as an underdog; it would be a major triumph for it to mass produce an EV with heart-pounding performance. Fortunately, that now seems to be the goal.

“When we first started talking about electrification, there was this thought that there had to be a trade-off: It was either going to be green and boring and no fun, or really exciting but burn a lot of fossil fuels,” Ford said. “Electrification has come to the point that you can do both.”

The manufacturer is already in the later stages of development and a large, heavily camouflaged crossover sporting a fake exhaust pipe and no gas cap has already been spotted on public roads. However, beyond its claimed 300-mile (or better) range, little is known about the future model. In fact, this is one of the few times that company brass has even directly acknowledged the vehicle as having serious performance chops.

Due in late 2020, the electric crossover will likely don the “Mach E” moniker (patent filings for the name emerged in December). However, Ford is under no obligation to use that title and could just as easily fall back on its earlier Mach 1 tie-in or come up with an entirely new name. Production was originally intended to commence in Flat Rock, Michigan later this year, but Ford ultimately decided to build the vehicle in Mexico. We hope some leaks sneak north of the border in the coming months.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • TS020 TS020 on Feb 27, 2019

    If they really want to use the 'Mach' name as well as showing that it's EV they should call it the Mark E Mach

  • Ion Ion on Feb 27, 2019

    Should be interesting. EV’s have instant torque. I’m curious to see how one tuned for the 1/4 mile will turnout.

  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
  • Jeff Tesla should not be allowed to call its system Full Self-Driving. Very dangerous and misleading.
  • Slavuta America, the evil totalitarian police state
  • Steve Biro I have news for everybody: I don't blame any of you for worrying about the "gummint" monitoring you... but you should be far more concerned about private industry doing the same thing.
Next