Piston Slap: Don't Jump to Conclusions!

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC commentator Towncar writes:

I just recently had a dead battery on the Town Car, so learning how to properly jump start a car battery has been on my mind. I’m telling you, there’s a lot to say on this subject once you get into it!

  1. Do you really have to put the negative clamp on some exposed part of the cars body, which will probably be inconveniently located and totally greasy, when the negative battery terminal is sitting right there, handy and probably clean enough to make contact?
  2. What about those things that are supposed to plug into the cigarette lighter and give you a jump that way — will they work or burn the car down?
  3. And those little pocket-size jump boxes — any good?
  4. Can you damage the electronics in a modern car with a jump? (Assuming you don’t reverse the clamps.)
  5. And have you seen those plugs they have in the grilles of some service vehicles — they just stick in a cord, the other end has clamps, and there you are. Why doesn’t every vehicle have a plug like that? A plug-to-plug connection would get around the whole clamp business anyway.
  6. Or why don’t cars just have two batteries?
  7. Or why don’t they all have battery run down protectors? Should you install one of those protector things if your car doesn’t have it?

Sajeev answers:

Talk about a loaded query! Let’s do this thing:

  1. Yes because a spark can ignite a de-gassing battery. Granted I am SUPER GUILTY of this, but after a bit of Googling I learned my lesson. And all batteries vent, no matter the design? If you don’t have a clean ground, clean your engine and check the condition of your negative battery cable/grounds…killing multiple birds with two stones.
  2. I assume they work, just not with the speed you’d expect. Backfeeding juice is limited by the wire/fuse size, but hey, if I can backfeed power to a hurricane-damaged house with a gas generator wired via the dryer connection…why not?
  3. See #2
  4. Possibly but not likely: that’s what fuses (and fusible links, if equipped) are for.
  5. Cars are too expensive and littered with fail points as it is: no thank you!
  6. See #5 and keep in mind that many modern, fuel/emissions efficient sports sedans weigh not much less than your rather simple Town Car.
  7. Run down protectors are a good idea, but I’d never spend the money or time to install one on an older vehicle. That’s what jumper cables in the trunk are for.

Final thoughts, Best and Brightest?

[Image: Ford]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.


Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 73 comments
  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Jan 04, 2019

    My portable generator has a battery charger built in. But that's a little big to carry around in a car. Just went to pull the Tahoe out of the garage tonight and the battery was completely dead. Think it hasn't moved for 3-4 weeks. I just put a battery charger on it for an hour or so to get it started. That's better/safer/easier than jumping it, just takes longer which no big deal if you got the time. Plus no way I'd jump it with the Volt. It may be OK but I'm not about to test the waters and find out!....LOL

  • Vladzdor Vladzdor on Jan 05, 2019

    I have a VW Phaeton. These all came with a dual battery setup -- one for Starting and the other for Electronics, on either side of the trunk. Power is needed from both batteries to start the car, as the Electronics battery supplies the ECU. So if the first starting attempt fails to turn the engine over due to weak batteries, the car will automatically parallel the batteries during the driver's second attempt to ensure sufficient power to start. So far, this has never failed to work even after months of idle time. In case both batteries are too weak to jump start the car, a chassis ground point and remote battery terminal post are provided under the hood. However, *why* is connecting to a chassis ground point safer than connecting to the weak battery's negative terminal? Is there a lower chance of sparks? If so, why? Seems to me a chassis ground connection could still cause a very weak battery to explode as pwrwrench has described? Secondly, every jumper cable clamp I've seen has serrated copper jaws. But even with the best of intentions, only a couple of the copper points touch the battery nut. They don't even manage to grab onto the actual metal battery post but only some nut on the connector attached to the post. Seems to me this will have very high electrical resistance and impede the 100s of amps needed during a jump start. And that should only get worse when connected to a chassis ground that is even further away from the battery post.

    • SPPPP SPPPP on Apr 26, 2019

      The reason why the chassis ground point is theoretically safer is that it's farther away from the battery. Many (most) batteries vent some hydrogen gas over time. Because the connection and disconnection of the final point in the jumper cable circuit can cause a lot of sparks, making the final connection farther away from the battery reduces the chance of a fire. Now, sparks inside the battery, I don't think it would reduce the chance of that.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next