Faraday Future Confronting Layoffs, Pay Cuts, Probable Corporate Doom

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Following a previous article about Faraday Future, the manufacturer reached out to yours truly to clarify a few things. First of all, the company deemed the headline and body a bit “jagged.” Understandable, as no manufacturer wants to be called “America’s Worst Automaker” by some bespectacled creep sitting behind a keyboard. Faraday’s spokesperson also noted that deliveries would not begin in December and that the vehicle fire we referenced was a “minor incident” involving a pre-production model undergoing testing at the firm’s Hanford manufacturing facility.

Actually, that makes things sound a little worse than initially reported, as it appears the company doesn’t have a production date anymore. But I will acquiesce that I could have been clearer with that’s going on with its new financial backer, Evergrande. The pair have been at each other’s throats over money for a while, which is important because the spat is now costing people their jobs. We really need to get into the nitty gritty as to why.

Officially, Faraday claims real estate giant Evergrande tried to screw the company out of funding and gain control by making it impossible for CEO Jia Yueting (known within the company as “YT”) to begin production. According to their initial agreement, FF has until the end of the year to start production — or Jia will be forced to bow out.

From Faraday Future:

After its initial $800 [million] investment, Evergrande agreed in July 2018 to make further payments earlier than originally agreed, including $500 [million] of the $1.2 billion, in 2018. Contrary to what Evergrande has told the press and its shareholders, neither FF’s CEO YT Jia nor anyone else “manipulated” the board of Evergrande in reaching these agreements. In agreeing to bring a portion of its payments forward to 2018, Evergrande had a full understanding of why the funds were needed, and when they were needed, in order to achieve production and delivery of FF 91 in 2019. But contrary to what has been reported, Evergrande failed to make any of the promised additional payments beyond the original $800 [million] investment, despite FF and its CEO complying with their obligations and meeting all required conditions for funding under the July 2018 agreement. Instead, Evergrande held the payments back to try to gain control and ownership over FF China and all of FF’s [intellectual property]. At the same time, Evergrande is preventing FF from accepting any immediate financing from other sources.

While we’re just about positive Evergrande is trying to oust Jia and gain control of the automaker’s IP, it’s not clear if this was the investor’s plan all along or if it simply became annoyed with the company asking for more money up front. Faraday needed a lot of money to handle unpaid debts and it’s believed that a significant portion of the initial $800 million went toward that. But FF claims all parties were aware of that going into the deal.

From Evergrande’s perspective, Jia tried to get the board of directors to approve an advance of $700 million, which was refused. It then claimed that CEO took the case to an arbitrator in Hong Kong, on the grounds that it had welched on their July arrangement. That appears unsettled as of the time of this writing. But, with so much of the automaker’s funding coming out of China, it’s a little tricky for us to tell exactly what’s going on.

We don’t even know the exact terms of Faraday’s deal with Evergrande, just that the real estate company had a lot of leverage since the automaker was so desperate for funding at the start of the summer. However, it appears the manufacturer put up basically everything it had, including its intellectual property, as collateral.

Now, The Verge reports that these money troubles have come to a head (yet again) and are affecting FF’s staff. Faraday Future is cutting its employees’ salaries by 20 percent, according to internal emails. Layoffs are also said to begin soon, though the number of staffers affected is unknown. Jia Yueting has also decided to decrease his annual salary to just $1 — with some members of the management team electing to take pay cuts in excess of 20 percent as a sign of good faith.

It’s not quite the comeback Faraday Future was hoping for. It’s also a little sad this time, as regular peoples’ lives are being affected after being issued $800 million in hope. We may frequently engage in taking jabs at wealthy executives who mismanage their companies without an overabundance of guilt, but it’s a different story when regular folks are involved. And we doubt Faraday’s line workers have access to a stellar severance package.

[Image: Faraday Future]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Akear Akear on Oct 23, 2018

    This can't be a the worse car company, because they are not even a valid company to begin with.

  • Phila_DLJ Phila_DLJ on Oct 23, 2018

    To paraphrase Marco Rubio on Repeat: "Let's dispel this fiction once and for all that Faraday Future doesn't know what it's doing. It knows exactly what it's doing."

  • EBFlex At the summer property putting boats in the water, leveling boat lifts, cleaning the lots for summer, etc. Typical cabin stuff in the most beautiful place on the planet
  • Lou_BC I've I spent the past few days in what we refer to as "the lower mainland". I see Tesla's everywhere and virtually every other brand of EV. I was in downtown Vancouver along side a Rivian R1T. A Rivian R1S came off as side street and was following it. I saw one other R1S. 18% of new vehicles in BC are EV'S. It tends to match what I saw out my windshield. I only saw 2 fullsized pickups. One was a cool '91 3/4 ton regular cab. I ran across 2 Tacoma's. Not many Jeeps. There were plenty of Porches, Mercedes, and BMW's. I saw 2 Aston Martin DBX707's. It's been fun car watching other than the stress of driving in big city urban traffic. I'd rather dodge 146,000 pound 9 axle logging trucks on one lane roads.
  • IBx1 Never got the appeal of these; it looks like there was a Soviet mandate to create a car with two doors and a roof that could be configured in different ways.
  • CAMeyer Considering how many voters will be voting for Trump because they remember that gas prices were low in 2020–never mind the pandemic—this seems like a wise move.
  • The Oracle Been out on the boat on Lake James (NC) and cooking up some hella good food here with friends at the lake place.
Next