Audi E-Tron Delayed As EVs Suffer From Global Supply Issues

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Audi’s first electric sport utility vehicle, the much-touted E-Tron, will arrive at dealerships a month later than anticipated. According to the automaker, a software development issue has stymied the rollout.

While nothing has reportedly busted, Audi claims it needs to obtain the necessary regulatory clearances for some ones and zeros that were modified during the development process. Normally, we would assume the applicable agencies would have been informed of this in advance, but we don’t know what Audi changed. All the manufacturer admits to is that alterations were made to benefit the customer.

German outlet Bild am Sonntag claims things were a little more complicated, however. In addition to speculating that the delay could actually stretch out for several months, the publication claimed Audi had issues with its battery supplier, LG Chem. The South-Korean supplier is rumored to have raised its battery prices by 10 percent due to swelling demand — threatening a supplier bottleneck for all of Volkswagen Group’s electric vehicles.

“We [typically] do not comment on topics such as price negotiations with suppliers,” an Audi spokesman told the outlet in German.

This shouldn’t come as a surprise for those keeping tabs on electric cars. While automakers have been bullish in their promotion of EVs, they know that demand will likely remain relatively low over the next few years. Still, that hasn’t stopped them from suffering from supply issues.

Practically every manufacturer selling a battery-electric vehicle has hit a snag. Last year, Hyundai encountered unanticipated demand for the Ioniq EV and was unable to cope while Tesla’s Model 3 struggled to hit production targets in 2018 — due to inadequate tooling at its own battery plant. Meanwhile, Buick said it was forced to delay the launch of the Velite EV in China in late summer due to an issue with its battery supplier.

[Images: Audi]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 11 comments
  • Fazalmajid Fazalmajid on Oct 22, 2018

    I've never believed the FUD vaporware announcements of the German brands. They are so far behind (not just Tesla but also Renault/Nissan, GM and even Jaguar) they don't even know what they don't know. Like the fact Tesla consumed half the world's supply of 18650 cells even before the model 3, and if you haven't made supply chain arrangements like the gigafactory, you’re not even an also-ran.

    • See 5 previous
    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Oct 24, 2018

      @conundrum: Flat pack cells make sense for packaging, but they are harder to cool and more expensive to build than round cells. The Tesla 2170 cell is a co-design between Tesla and Panasonic; Tesla isn't just buying it from a catalog. While you mock the genius of Tesla's approach to battery design and production, you can't show the genius of their competitors who have used alternative approaches, and whom together now occupy 25% of the US EV market. Here's another reason other mfrs don't use round cells - they can't actually buy them because Tesla has dominated the 18650 market for years.

  • IBx1 IBx1 on Oct 23, 2018

    At least Sergio had the gnocchi to just say "please don't buy a 500e, we lose money on those."

    • See 1 previous
    • HotPotato HotPotato on Oct 24, 2018

      @SCE to AUX Chrysler, stand behind a product? You're funny. They've been especially awful to green buyers. Build the Aspen Hybrid, only to immediately discontinue it. Build the 500e, and deliver it with never-fixed defective software (hint to new owners: always wait for an audible clunk from the battery contactors before plugging in). Build the magnificent Pacifica plug-in Hybrid, roll out a mandatory software update that can cause the car to catch fire, then stop short of ordering a recall to fix your potentially deadly defective update. Not cool, FCA.

  • The Oracle Good pick by Tim in terms of platform - he doesn’t pick the prices.
  • MaintenanceCosts The Allison product that ought to be in these trucks is a scaled-down version of this. It works amazingly in use cases far more brutal than anything a pickup truck is ever subjected to. The agency I used to work for recently retired a fleet equipped with the first generation of the system after 20 years and nearly a million city miles each, with very few system failures.
  • Jkross22 Looks like a Buick Envista up front and a Model 3 at the back. It's not bad, but is too derivative.The inside? Volvo/Polestar said they didn't want anyone dying in their cars after 2024. Sure seems like they're trying to kill as many of their buyers as possible by distracting them with this nonsense. Seriously.... do any UI infotainment/screen engineers test these things while driving, or just on the workbench?
  • Tane94 The commercials with smarmy Joe Isuzu ( actor David Leisure) were epic and hysterical. "You have my word on it" was his catchphrase to the outlandish claims he made.
  • Mitchell Leitman Matt, Canada is getting the EV5 as well. Looks like Kia likes Canada
Next