Subprime Car Buyers Haven't Defaulted This Much Since '96

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Grunge was on its way out the door, Pepsi aficionado Bob Dole was challenging William Jefferson Clinton for the keys to the White House, and the Ford Contour was still a relatively new sight on American roads.

That was the last time this many U.S. car owners fell way, way behind on their subprime auto loans.

According to Fitch Ratings (via Bloomberg), the delinquency rate of subprime auto loans hit 5.8 percent in March, a figure not seen since 1996. Even during the recession, the number of buyers with payments more than 60 days past due just barely nudged over 5 percent.

Following a recession-era spike in subprime car loan defaults, the rate climbed steadily from about 2011 onwards, surpassing the peak of that earlier spike in 2015. Delinquency rose as lenders began approving an ever-greater number of auto loans in the years after the economic downturn — many of them to buyers with poor credit scores. In recent years, “ deep subprime” loans emerged as a concern.

For automakers, the explosion of auto loans, including subprime ones, during the economic recovery helped push the industry to record sales volumes. We’ve since hit a plateau.

Just one year ago, the number of auto loans classified as such (basically, customers with a FICO score below 550) reached nearly a third of all subprime loans. Naturally, lenders were urged to proceed with caution. According to Equifax figures from January, it seems some took that advice to heart — between January 2018 and a year earlier, the number of auto loans and leases approved for subprime car buyers fell 10 percent.

As for who’s approving the riskiest loans, Equifax points the finger away from the big banks.

“Neither banks nor credit unions have done ‘deep subprime’ lending,” Gunnar Blix, deputy chief economist at Equifax, told Bloomberg. “That’s mainly done by smaller dealer-finance and independent finance companies” (that rely on asset-backed securities to stay afloat).

[Image: EveryCarListed P/ Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 92 comments
  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on May 19, 2018

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/4174775-santander-consumer-usa-doubling-worsening-subprime How would you like to be Santander?!?...their largest customer is FCA.

    • CapVandal CapVandal on May 20, 2018

      They are sitting at close to a 52 week high. I wouldn't dare short them. They seem to be survivors.

  • CapVandal CapVandal on May 20, 2018

    Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., a specialized consumer finance company, provides vehicle finance and third-party servicing in the United States. Its products and services include retail installment contracts and vehicle leases, as well as dealer loans for inventory, construction, real estate, working capital, and revolving lines of credit. The company also offers financial products and services related to motorcycles, recreational vehicles, and marine vehicles; originates vehicle loans through a Web-based direct lending program; purchases vehicle retail installment contracts from other lenders; and services automobile, and recreational and marine vehicle portfolios for other lenders. In addition, it provides private-label credit cards and other consumer finance products, as well as point-of-sale financing. The company was founded in 1995 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. is a subsidiary of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. The premise of the article is that something wrong. But SC is profitable. So much for that.

  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
  • Lorenzo I'd like to believe, I want to believe, having had good FoMoCo vehicles - my aunt's old 1956 Fairlane, 1963 Falcon, 1968 Montego - but if Jim Farley is saying it, I can't believe it. It's been said that he goes with whatever the last person he talked to suggested. That's not the kind of guy you want running a $180 billion dollar company.
Next