Car, Tell: Quintet of Safety Suppliers Fined for Price Fixing

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It appears the fictional JR Ewing isn’t the only one having to deal with cartels. Antitrust regulators in the EU have fined five safety equipment suppliers a combined 34 million euros ($40 million) for taking part in a scheme to fix prices for seat belts and airbags sold to Japanese automakers.

The cartels were allegedly supplying the safety equipment to Toyota, Suzuki, and Honda at inflated prices between calendar years 2004 and 2010.

Reuters reports an investigation spanning the last six years began with raids of facilities associated with the cartels in June 2011, culminating in the fines levied with this decision.

Penalties to the individual companies range from 156,000 euros to 12.7 million euros. The largest amount was levied at a company already well known for causing headaches to manufacturers who used its safety products: Takata.

Takata, the supplier of millions of airbags that seemed to do more harm than good, filed for bankruptcy earlier this year. The total global liabilities the supplier has to endure is well into the billions. A research company in Tokyo claims Takata’s total liabilities for ongoing recalls, penalties, and settlements is likely somewhere in the neighborhood of $15 billion. What’s another few million tossed on top of that, then?

However, according to the Commission report, Takata received full immunity for revealing three of the cartels (thereby avoiding an aggregate fine of approximately 74 million euros.

Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy said: “The five suppliers fined today colluded to maximise their profits from the sale of these components. This may have raised the costs of these car parts for a number of manufacturers selling cars in Europe, potentially affecting consumers.” Fixing the prices of anything is shady; teaming up to make extra coin on important safety equipment is even shadier.

The Commission’s investigation revealed the existence of four separate infringements. The following table details the participation and the duration of each company’s involvement in each of the four infringements:

Regulatory bodies are seeming to be cracking down on this type of nefarious activity with newfound force. Witness the raid on Daimler and BMW offices this past summer, carried out on suspicion there was a conspiracy to fix prices in diesel and other technologies. Companies which fudge fuel economy numbers have also come under the microscope.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next