Toyota's Brand Value Seems Unstoppable; Mercedes-Benz Close to Unseating BMW

by Steph Willems

Published: June 6th, 2017

Yes, we’re talking because brand value is a point of pride for all companies, not just automakers. In the latest ranking of brand value, it seems Toyota needn’t worry about losing its lofty perch among automakers.

For the fourth year, the Japanese automaker beat out all other car companies in the 2017 BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands ranking published by market research company Kantar Millward Brown. Valued at $28.66 billion, Toyota sits in the 30th spot, one notch above Walmart. That’s two spots lower than last year’s rankings, something Toyota can blame on increase costs and a weak yen.

The ranking also contains good news for Ford and troubling news for BMW.

Bavaria’s most famous automaker was booted from the top spot among automakers in 2013, resting in second place ever since. However, competition from its main German rival is fierce. With a brand value of $24.56 billion, BMW’s status eroded significantly in the past year, placing third-place finisher Mercedes-Benz within striking distance of its podium. Mercedes received a brand valuation of $23.51 billion this year.

This year’s list sees Honda and Ford switch places, with the only Detroit Three entry moving up to fourth place. Rounding out the top 10 most valuable automakers are Nissan, Audi, Tesla, Land Rover and Porsche. Among the top global brands, Nissan ranks 100th. Tesla made its first appearance in the top 10 automakers last year, ranked in the last spot, making its rapid elevation newsworthy.

“The Tesla story is interesting because it is not just the cars it offers now, it is the promise for the future,” Peter Walshe, Global BrandZ director at Kantar Millward Brown, told Automotive News. “There is a perception that it offers a fantastic brand experience, even among non-owners. The only other brands that I’ve seen have this kind of appeal before they got into mass market were Apple and Facebook.”

Promise for the future isn’t everything with would-be buyers, however. The actual experience of owning a high quality product counts for much more, which explains Toyota’s dominance of the segment. The automaker is “seen as a reliable, quality value brand,” said Walshe.

Kantar Millward Brown compiles its annual list from data gained from 3 million consumer interviews.

[Image: Toyota]

#BMW #BrandRankings #BrandValue #Mercedes-Benz #Tesla #Toyota

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 26 comments

Sector 5 on Jun 06, 2017

Say Nissan just squeezed in at #100... Must be a Mirage...

Like Reply
Bd2 on Jun 07, 2017

Wouldn't feel too bad for BMW. BMW will be revamping most of lineup in the next few years, including ALL of its crossovers (in addition to adding the X7).

Like Reply

Recent Comments

MaintenanceCosts We need a $15k EV, probably a tall hatch, that satisfies US safety standards with reasonable comfort and durability and a warranty. That would actually be affordable to the median wage earner.
Calrson Fan I'll take a simple over cheap. Although that should equate to cheap or at least cheaper. I'm so over all the useless & intrusive tech. common in today's cars & trucks. Which is why I drive older stuff. We need more vehicles geared towards simplicity and longevity, like the Slate. if that ever makes it to market. As I once heard on American Hot Rod, less is more. Isn't that the truth!
28-Cars-Later Maybe it will eventually change but as of right now even if you spend the money to build these stations everywhere, if the electricity sold is 100%+ of what its sold for in residential rates it will never take off. To a degree a convenience charge amount (of not 100%) could fly but smart owners will understand the trade off and limit their use of it. Those without home charging capabilities simply won't continue to pay through the nose on electricity - a utility of which has skyrocketed even wholesale and I suspect will continue to do so.
KOKing Need and want are definitely different, especially today. Not only are relative expectations different from 40-50yrs ago, but used cars' value/features/quality probably make them more attractive options than a couple generations ago. I suspect for the same $21k as a Hyundai Venue, a lot of people would choose a ~5yr old Ford Explorer instead. Today's gas prices might make some think twice, but a lot of the same people probably won't think as far as repair costs.I think something interesting to look at in other global markets where historically cheap, small cars continue to be available, where cheap Chinese cars are becoming available, whether the latter end up quickly displacing the former in the low-cost segment long-term (I suspect yes).
Lorenzo What the American market needs is a 1997 Honda Civic EX in coupe or sedan form, fully loaded like in 1997 at 1997 prices ($19K) or a slightly bigger 1997 Nissan Altima GXE sedan with the larger 2.4L engine and reliable Jatco automatic for about the same price. I have owned both, and wish I had either one back so I could get rid of the keyless Cr**p, the drive-by-wire, and the touch screen, and operate the car myself with buttons and knobs..