What Kind of Message Was Ford Sending by Introducing the 2018 Mustang on a Tuesday?
“Somewhere out there, a mom or dad is explaining to Mustang-loving children they didn’t get to see the new model because Ford was playing ‘I’ve Got A Secret’ when the family spent its time and money on a day at the show.”
The Detroit Free Press is madder than the proverbial hatter over Ford’s decision to delay the introduction of the 2018 Mustang until the Tuesday of the NAIAS public week. But you can ignore all the hysteria, including Freep’s suggestion that Ford offered refunds to everybody who attended the Charity Preview and the first three public days, because once again, Ford’s got a better idea — and it’s one that is going to be used everywhere from Audi to Volvo in years to come.
Let’s start with this: Revealing a new car at the Detroit Auto Show is a waste of time and resources. As Natalie Merchant would say, it’s a tear in a salted sea. The journosaurs and vid-kids are rushing from one press event to the next, trying to digest your spiel into a three-paragraph summary to go with some hastily-snapped shots or the pre-loaded embargo pics given to them ahead of time. Nothing you say or show is going to get a full share of attention. It will just be stacked up with the rest of the news from the show.
All of that is well and good if you’re just introducing some new trim levels or blabbering on about mobility, but if you’ve spent a couple of billion dollars on a new car, or even the hundreds of millions of dollars involved in a major refresh like the 2018 ‘Stang, sticking with the regular show program will ensure that you wind up being stuck between the new Odyssey and the new LS500 in the enthusiast-site show round-ups. That’s no good.
Over the past decade or so, we’ve seen an increasing number of automakers step outside the traditional Detroit-show script to get special attention for their products. Because the self-sustaining blobular entity that we know as the journosaur-PR-industrial complex thinks in certain narrow and predictable paths, most of these off-schedule reveals have come in the form of a fabulously expensive and exclusive party before the show to which only the the most dependable bootlickers/influencers are usually invited. The quid pro quo is both fair and explicit: we cover your dinner and drinks for the evening, you write about our product before you get swept away in the rushing tide of Monday’s press-release events.
Ford’s certainly done that sort of thing in the past, but this time I think somebody decided to apply some intelligent thought to the process. It probably went something like this:
- We don’t want to be buried in the Monday rush.
- But doing it beforehand is both expensive and difficult, because the average toad-shaped journosaur will skip the 2018 Mustang’s reveal for a Rolls-Royce or Mercedes-Benz party every single time.
- But… and here’s the key piece of thinking…
- nobody buys a car right after the show anyway!
- So it’s not necessary to beat the show… you only have to be separate from the show.
So, Ford waits a week for all the hype and all the PR and all the hot takes to die down… and then, BAM! NEW MUSTANG, BICHEZZZZZ! Had they shown it in the midst of all the sustainability crap the previous Monday, it would have been worth two sentences in a wrap-up piece. But by letting it appear on the public day with relatively little fanfare, Ford created a newsworthy story all by itself.
There’s a particular scene from the book God Emperor Of Dune that I’d like to use as a metaphor here, but how many of you have read the book? Very few, so let’s just continue on. (If you did read the book, think back to when the Face Dancers attack Leto’s cart in the form of multiple Duncan Idahos, and the real Duncan chooses an unusual way to differentiate himself.) The point is that you’ve got to hit ’em where they ain’t if you want to make real waves in $THE_CURRENT_YEAR.
There’s no debate to be had about the brilliance of Ford’s action. The only question left: Was it ethical? The Free Press’ Mark Phelan is upset that the car wasn’t available for viewing during the Charity Preview or the first few days of the show. As far as the Charity Preview goes — seriously, fuck those people twice. I attended the Charity Preview every year from 2001 to 2007 and every year I walked away asking myself why I was spending $800 to associate with the biggest group of loudmouthed jerkoffs in the Midwest. So they didn’t see a Mustang. So what. If you can spend $450 or more per head on a party, you’re probably not a buyer for a 2018 Mustang anyway. Based on what I saw at that event, 90 percent of it is standing around holding a champagne glass and desperately trying to make eye contact with somebody whom you have a vague personal or social connection. Shed no tears for the “charitable” — they were all too busy taking selfies in a Rolls-Royce Ghost or something.
Things are a little trickier when you talk about the public, who paid real money to come in and see all the cars. But participation in an auto show for a manufacturer is a matter of choice, not a public duty. Look at Porsche — they skipped the show entirely. You can argue that the Big 2.5 owe the public a little bit of participation, since many of the people visiting the show are employees of the domestic automakers or their suppliers, but it’s hard to define exactly what is “owed” there.
If you didn’t see the 2018 Mustang at the auto show because you went early, you have two choices. You can go back, of course. Or you can visit a Ford dealer. This latter option is what Ford would prefer, because you can’t buy Mustangs at the auto show. You have to go to the dealers. So once again we see that Ford is a little smarter than the average bear. Look for the other automakers to start following the Blue Oval’s lead.
Maybe you’ll eventually see the majority of the new-car reveals happening during the actual show, and not the media preview. Once that happens, there’s another question that we’ll all need to ask: What do we need the media preview for, anyway? Why not make the press go to the show like regular people? What harm would it do? If playing “I’ve Got A Secret” is a bad idea, and according to the Freep it most certainly is, then why not get rid of all the secrets entirely?
More by Jack Baruth
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- EBFlex Garbage but for less!
- FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
- RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
- Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
- Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Comments
Join the conversation
I was not aware that the Mustang was going through a total redesign especially since a completely new Mustang was introduced just a few years ago. i thought that a complete redesign would last more than 2 or 3 model years.
I didn't see the big deal. The 2018 Mustang is hardly a huge departure from the 2017--in fact, I attended the NAIAS (while the car was on display) and walked by it several times before I saw the sign stating what it was.