Mazda CEO Explains Strategy While Simultaneously Breaking the Hearts of Rotary Fanboys Everywhere

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mazda has big aspirations for the future. However, its immediate plans don’t appear to include a successor to the RX-8, despite Mazda’s continued development on its trademark rotary engine and other conflicting information.

Instead, CEO Masamichi Kogai says the company is going to focus on its push upmarket while diversifying powertrains and cementing itself as the sporting choice over its rivals.

Speaking to Automotive News with the help of an interpreter, Mr. Kogai explained his vision of Mazda’s more upscale future.

“We want to distinguish ourselves by being a little elevated above the other Japanese or mainstream brands,” he said.

“If the car itself is not attractive, we can’t command a higher price. So, for the Mazda 3, the Mazda 6 and the CX-3, they will all have major updates. And the CX-5 is undergoing a full model change. In that way, we keep improving the models all the time. Instead of just creating a buzz to come see a new design, we enhance the vehicle’s potential in performance and technology. That is something new we are implementing.”

Part of that implementation pertains to the company’s next generation of Skyactiv drivetrains, which include a diesel option on next year’s CX-5.

While the diesel version of the crossover will be coming to the United States, Kogai suspects most diesel sales will continue taking place in Japan.

“In the U.S., diesel is not necessarily the cheaper option. It’s about 8 percent more expensive than gasoline. But compared with high-octane gasoline, diesel is cheaper. We still have to pinpoint where people can find the advantage in buying diesel,” he explained.

Inevitably, Mazda’s partnership with Toyota will produce an electric powertrain too. The company thinks the safest play is to keep EV production at a low-volume and not abandon combustion engines too quickly. Mazda’s Head of Research and Development Kiyoshi Fujiwara asserts that by 2020, “five to ten percent of the market will be pure EV, while the rest will still use ICE. Therefore ICE is [currently] the most important technology in the world.”

Kogai’s take seems to be that electrification is inevitable and important for Mazda, especially in the form of its own unique hybrid. The company has long been hinting that the rotary engine might make a return — if not in the hypothetical RX-9, as a range extender for some type of EV.

“We ended production of the RX-8 with the rotary engine,” Kogai stated. “But if we were to restart production of the rotary engine again, we need to make sure it wouldn’t be just short-lived. We need it to meet future emissions regulations. We are still conducting our R&D activity to overcome any issues we have with emissions and fuel efficiency.”

When asked if the rotary would see the light of day as a supplemental power source for an EV or as a primary drivetrain first, he said that the zero-emissions vehicle mandate made electrification the clear priority. Kogai didn’t even suggest the rotary as a practical stand-alone option, not even in a possible RX car.

“I think that as a sports car option, the MX-5 1.5-liter or 2.0-liter conventional engine, with its power and acceleration, might be a more exhilarating experience.”

Putting the the final nail into the RX-9’s coffin was his single word response to if there were any plans to introduce a sports car larger than the MX-5.

“No.”

[Image: Mazda]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 51 comments
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next