Meth Dealers' Worst Nightmare - a Ford That Sniffs Out Drugs (and Gets Great Mileage)

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Call it the Ford Narc.

In the near future, police cruisers could detect drug labs just by sniffing the air as they drive down a street, CBC DFW reports (via Autoblog), all thanks to a device built by a team from the University of North Texas.

The highly sensitive mass spectrometer, calibrated in the clean air climes of Antarctica, was installed in the front seat of a Ford Fusion Energi sedan eight months ago.

Originally designed to test air quality, the device — built with the help of Inficon of Syracuse, New York — is now tasked with detecting something much more clandestine than simple smog. Chemicals used in drug making — meth, especially — waft out of houses and apartments whether their owners like it or not, and the device can pinpoint that chemical signature from a quarter-mile away.

“The car could just drive by it and keep moving down the road,” Dr. Guido Verbeck told the CBS affiliate. “It’ll alert the officers there’s something going on at the house, and where the location is.”

Given the sensitive nature of the equipment, it’s easy to see why the team chose a plug-in hybrid for their test vehicle.

A fine-tuned piece of technology is of little use if the operator can’t decipher test results, so the team whipped up software that analyzes the data and tells a police officer exactly what the car is smelling.

“The operator, or the tactical person using it, does not have to know anything about mass spec, they just know that this is bad,” Verbeck said.

As useful a tool as this could be for law enforcement, the test contraption was too bulky for use inside a police cruiser. The team then miniaturized it, so it could fit into a portable case.

Police forces have a habit of spending money on things that make enforcement and crime-solving easier, so the makers (and eventual marketers) of this technology are sitting on a gold mine.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
Next