Feds Hit Takata With $70M Fine For Defective Airbags

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced Tuesday it would fine auto supplier Takata $70 million for its defective airbags that have caused seven deaths and nearly 100 injuries.

Regulators announced that an additional $130 million fine could be levied on the supplier if they do not comply with additional safety standards or if more defects are found.

“For years, Takata has built and sold defective products, refused to acknowledge the defect, and failed to provide full information to NHTSA, its customers, or the public,” Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement. “The result of that delay and denial has harmed scores of consumers and caused the largest, most complex safety recall in history. Today’s actions represent aggressive use of NHTSA’s authority to clean up these problems and protect public safety.”

In addition to the fines, NHTSA said it would scrutinize further operations by the supplier. As part of the consent order with the company, Takata agreed that it had failed to recall faulty airbags, and lied to investigators and the public.

The safety authority said it would appoint an independent monitor for the company for the next five years.

Additionally, NHTSA said it would speed recalls of defective airbags, which were fitted into 19 million cars made by 12 different automakers. In all, NHTSA said 23 million inflators could be affected.

“Today, we are holding Takata responsible for its failures, and we are taking strong action to protect the traveling public,” NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind said in a statement. “We are accelerating Takata recalls to get safe air bags into American vehicles more quickly, ensuring that consumers at the greatest risk are protected, and addressing the long-term risk of Takata’s use of a suspect propellant.”

NHTSA said it would replace high-risk airbags by June 2016 and all affected airbags would be removed by 2019.


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 16 comments
  • Cantankerous Cantankerous on Nov 04, 2015

    My first impression upon hearing the $70 million figure was that, although large compared to previous fines, it was pretty small considering the scope and heinousness of Takata's deceipt. However, upon further reflection I'm guessing that the Feds wanted to avoid levying a fine so large it would guarantee bankruptcy, both so that Takata will remain in business long enough to manufacture replacements for all those defective airbags (my family alone owns *three* affected vehicles) and to make sure there'd be some money left over for the inevitable host of civil suits.

  • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Nov 04, 2015

    I don't want to start trouble, but I do have an honest question. What good are airbags? If worn, would not shoulder safety belt do everything an airbag would do without causing further damage to the face and head...as I understand airbags do? I understand there is some weakness to the designs of shoulder/chest belts, but could these not be addressed before forcing the use of airbags which do work only with explosions of hard material into faces? Could not the belts be better improved to perform more safely than airbags? The most dangerous airbag, IMO, is the front off the wheel or dash. Perhaps limiting them to window drop down or foot-well explosions would be a much better government demand than forcing the explosions into passenger faces. This was, after all, all government driven.

    • See 3 previous
    • TrailerTrash TrailerTrash on Nov 04, 2015

      Kyree I am trying to make a point...and much of it is the "someone consciously choosing" vs government forced. I suppose this is going to lead nowhere, since any personal choice today is the opinion of the village. From suicide to driving without a seat-belt to riding a bicycle without a helmet...all rules being written in pencil by the majority...with or without logic. You can take a side and justify it in any way you wish. But it is still a manipulation of the individual's right...or no right.

  • Probert A few mega packs would probably have served as decent backup.
  • Lou_BC Lead sleds. Now-a-days GM would just use Bondo.
  • Jrhurren This is a great series. Thanks Corey
  • Tane94 Not as stylish as the Soul which it is replacing but a practical shape and bonus points for EV only.
  • Ronin What is the magical white swan event in the foreseeable future that will suddenly reverse the trend?Success tends to follow success, and likewise failure. The perception, other than among true believers, is that e-cars are a lost cause. Neither government fiat, nor government bribery, nor even the promise of superior virtue among one's peers have been enough to push past the early adapter curve. Either the bust-out is right now for e-cars, or it doesn't happen. Marketing 101.Even subtle language-manipulation, such as deeming those possessing common sense as suffering from some sort of vague anxiety (eg, "range anxiety") has not been enough to induce people to care.Twenty years from now funny AI-generated comedians will make fun of the '20s, and their obsession with theose silly half-forgotten EVs. They will point out that, yes, EVs actually ran on electricity generated by such organic fuels as coal and natural gas after all, and then they will perform synthesized laughter at us.
Next