Piston Slap: MAP-ping Engine Load

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC regular David Holzman writes:

When my scan gauge says my engine is under 99% load, and I’ve only pushed the gas pedal about halfway down, does that mean, as I suspect, that I can floor it and I’m not going to get more than a drop more power out of it?

And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?

Sajeev answers:

I’ve wondered this myself, just not enough to research until someone posed the question to TTAC.

Since the dawn of carburetors, vehicles used engine vacuum to measure engine load under the guise of a fuel economy gauge. Earlier EFI machines implemented fuel injector duty cycle to spit out a fuel economy reading. It’s cheaper/easier/simpler to use the fuel injection computer’s powers to calculate an approximate number, but many (all?) newer models use the mass-airflow sensor (MAF) and/or the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor as the basis of these calculations.

As per SAE standard J1979, there are two engine load values: calculated and absolute load value. I suspect absolute load value is used in more customer facing interfaces, as it’s a normalized figure that might be easier to apply across multiple engines, platforms and operation parameters sans re-work. And it probably neuters the data as to not cause end user confusion, warranty claims, lawsuits, etc.

If reading this hamfisted analysis upsets you, methinks you’re a pretty frickin’ brilliant engineer. Distilling this into an easy to digest blog post isn’t easy, as I was more of a Collegiate SAE wonk. But let’s get it down to one sentence:

Load values are a normalized calculation of engine airflow, which isn’t a 100% accurate measure of the load on your vehicle’s engine at any time.

How’s that for not answering your question and giving me a headache? I console myself with this Hot Panther Looove:

Oooooh yeah, muuuuuuch better.

[Image: Shutterstock user Joyseulay]

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.


Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 34 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Aug 18, 2014

    It's trying to tell you to downshift/floor it, if you want faster acceleration.

  • Cdotson Cdotson on Aug 18, 2014

    "And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?" Strictly addressing this statement there are a couple misconceptions evident. Modern cars cannot prevent you from pushing the accelerator pedal further than where you hit full engine load. Pushing the pedal further down actually won't consume any more fuel anyway. Also in computer-controlled/EFI automobiles the "wasting gas" part starts happening once you surpass 80-85% load as that is typically the threshold at which the ECU starts referencing safe/rich fuel maps and ignoring the O2 sensors. Your ScanGauge should have a setting that will display to you whether you are in open/closed-loop operation. If you monitor that particular gauge you can train yourself to drive within closed-loop control to maximize fuel economy if you so desire. You will notice that at low engine speeds and in higher gears it will switch to open-loop operation with smaller throttle inputs than at higher speeds or in lower gears. Given that vehicles now are all either MPFI or DI there is every incentive to massively oversize the throttle body. Larger throttles produce less flow restriction and the need for turbulent flow at the butterfly valve for fuel atomization no longer exists. Larger throttles "leak" a little more and prevent some emissions problems that arrive at high engine speeds when you side-step the throttle.

    • See 6 previous
    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Aug 19, 2014

      @cdotson Emission controlled engines never run at stoichiometric except by chance when in open loop mode. To control the fuel the computer continuously adjusts the mixture until it gets rich or lean, once it sees that it is running lean it starts adjusting the other way until it sees a rich single then goes back to looking for it to be lean. Not only does this allow the computer to find the right fueling it is done to keep the catalytic converter working properly. The modern catalytic converter has an oxidation and reduction section. The oxidation section needs a lean mixture to provide the extra O2 for oxidation to occur. The reduction portion needs some unburnt fuel to keep the reaction hot and going. Cars with wide band O2 sensors still do this because the cat needs it.

  • 3-On-The-Tree 2014 Ford F150 Ecoboost 3.5L. By 80,000mi I had to have the rear main oil seal replaced twice. Driver side turbo leaking had to have all hoses replaced. Passenger side turbo had to be completely replaced. Engine timing chain front cover leak had to be replaced. Transmission front pump leak had to be removed and replaced. Ford renewed my faith in Extended warranty’s because luckily I had one and used it to the fullest. Sold that truck on caravan and got me a 2021 Tundra Crewmax 4x4. Not a fan of turbos and I will never own a Ford again much less cars with turbos to include newer Toyotas. And I’m a Toyota guy.
  • Duke Woolworth Weight 4800# as I recall.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Nissan Frontier @78000 miles has been oil changes ( eng/ diffs/ tranny/ transfer). Still on original brakes and second set of tires.
  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÃœV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
Next