Piston Slap: MAP-ping Engine Load
TTAC regular David Holzman writes:
When my scan gauge says my engine is under 99% load, and I’ve only pushed the gas pedal about halfway down, does that mean, as I suspect, that I can floor it and I’m not going to get more than a drop more power out of it?
And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?Sajeev answers:
I’ve wondered this myself, just not enough to research until someone posed the question to TTAC.
Since the dawn of carburetors, vehicles used engine vacuum to measure engine load under the guise of a fuel economy gauge. Earlier EFI machines implemented fuel injector duty cycle to spit out a fuel economy reading. It’s cheaper/easier/simpler to use the fuel injection computer’s powers to calculate an approximate number, but many (all?) newer models use the mass-airflow sensor (MAF) and/or the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor as the basis of these calculations.
As per SAE standard J1979, there are two engine load values: calculated and absolute load value. I suspect absolute load value is used in more customer facing interfaces, as it’s a normalized figure that might be easier to apply across multiple engines, platforms and operation parameters sans re-work. And it probably neuters the data as to not cause end user confusion, warranty claims, lawsuits, etc.
If reading this hamfisted analysis upsets you, methinks you’re a pretty frickin’ brilliant engineer. Distilling this into an easy to digest blog post isn’t easy, as I was more of a Collegiate SAE wonk. But let’s get it down to one sentence:
Load values are a normalized calculation of engine airflow, which isn’t a 100% accurate measure of the load on your vehicle’s engine at any time.
How’s that for not answering your question and giving me a headache? I console myself with this Hot Panther Looove:
Oooooh yeah, muuuuuuch better.
[Image: Shutterstock user Joyseulay]
Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.
More by Sajeev Mehta
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- MaintenanceCosts A few more years like this and it will be impossible for anyone to underwrite insurance products, covering either homes or cars, pretty much anywhere along the Gulf coast or the southern Atlantic coast. The potential exposure is not something any private-sector insurer is big enough to handle. At that point, Congress is going to be faced with a question. Does the nation as a whole want to subsidize public insurance for existing communities in those areas at great cost, or would it rather leave them uninsurable, meaning that no one will be willing to underwrite mortgages anymore and properties become near-worthless?It's not a good time to be in the property and casualty insurance business. Asheville just proved vividly that no place in the US is safe from extreme climate-related losses.
- Tassos On the SERIOUS Side: A Reliable ROlls ROyce never imported in the US was the V12 CENTURY. Now you can import 25+ year olds, which may be OK for Tim but NOT for us who need an UP TO DATE vehicle. The Century was a top exec car with a SUMPTUOUS interior, far superior even to the Lexus LS. UNfortunately, the latest century model is a Rolls Royce CULLINAN CLONE SUV, which I would not be dead driving. I suggest Toyota EXPLOIT their experience with the Century and produce a FLAGSHIP SEDAN that will be EQUAL to RR in luxury AND far better in RELIABILITY and at half the price of buying AND 10% of the cost of OWNING due to much less repairs. I am SURE the market is so small in this segment, that they will NOT do it, and deprive us of this LEGENDARY Vehicle in the Future As well.
- Lou_BC I pulled over into a road side rest stop once because the rain got so bad that I could barely see. Several other vehicles followed. As I sat there in my F150 watching, a Corvette wailed by. How could they not feel the vehicle hydroplaning? The steering on my heavy truck with excellent tires felt numb.
- Lou_BC Maloo GTSR W1
- MaintenanceCosts E34 M5 3.8. Not sure there has ever been a more charismatic engine than the S38B38.
Comments
Join the conversation
It's trying to tell you to downshift/floor it, if you want faster acceleration.
"And, in a modern car (’08 Civic, stick), will the computer control prevent me from wasting gas by pushing the gas pedal beyond the point where I’ve reached 99% load?" Strictly addressing this statement there are a couple misconceptions evident. Modern cars cannot prevent you from pushing the accelerator pedal further than where you hit full engine load. Pushing the pedal further down actually won't consume any more fuel anyway. Also in computer-controlled/EFI automobiles the "wasting gas" part starts happening once you surpass 80-85% load as that is typically the threshold at which the ECU starts referencing safe/rich fuel maps and ignoring the O2 sensors. Your ScanGauge should have a setting that will display to you whether you are in open/closed-loop operation. If you monitor that particular gauge you can train yourself to drive within closed-loop control to maximize fuel economy if you so desire. You will notice that at low engine speeds and in higher gears it will switch to open-loop operation with smaller throttle inputs than at higher speeds or in lower gears. Given that vehicles now are all either MPFI or DI there is every incentive to massively oversize the throttle body. Larger throttles produce less flow restriction and the need for turbulent flow at the butterfly valve for fuel atomization no longer exists. Larger throttles "leak" a little more and prevent some emissions problems that arrive at high engine speeds when you side-step the throttle.