Judge Will Allow Wanxiang to Bid on Fisker, Sets Feb. 12 Auction. Lutz Mum

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Reuters reports that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross ruled that an auction for the assets of defunct hybrid sports car maker Fisker Automotive will be held on February 12. The auction will be held in the New York offices of the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis and attendance will be limited to representatives of Fisker, the unsecured creditors’ committee, and the two bidders, the American unit of China’s Wanxiang Group, an automotive supplier, and Hybrid Tech Holdings, which is affiliated with Hong Kong investor Richard Li. Other potential bidders have until February 7th to tender offers.

Hybrid Tech has made an initial bid that it says is worth $55 million. That bid, known as a “credit bid” involves forgiving some of what the company owes on a $168 secured loan, which Li’s team has already bought for $25 million at a government auction last year. That loan had been part of a Department of Energy program intended to foster the growth of alternative energy vehicles. Li had already been a longtime investor in Fisker. Wanxiang, for its part, made a last minute stalking horse bid of $35.7 million in cash. Wanxiang bought Fisker’s battery supplier A123 Systems when that company filed for bankruptcy last year.

Wanxiang’s bid is seen as favorable by the unsecured creditors, who would get nothing in a complete credit bid, and also has the approval of officials in Delaware. Fisker had purchased the former GM assembly plant in Wilmington. Hybrid Tech has indicated that it would probably sell that asset whereas Wanxiang has said that it would like to build Fiskers there.

Last week, in an oral opinion, Judge Gross ordered that all bids will require some cash and he limited Hybrid Tech’s credit bid to the $25 million it paid for the loan.

Li’s lawyer is appealing, and called the ruling a “terrible precedent.” Judge Gross defended his decision in court on Friday. “Sometimes I’m right, and sometimes I’m wrong, and I think I’m right on this,” Gross said. “It was argued I was setting new precedent. I think I’m really following the law.” The judge then said that he’d be issuing a written opinion of his credit bid decision later today.

Fisker stopped production of the $100,000 Karma in 2012 and filed for protection from its creditors in November of 2013.

VL Motors Destino. A Fisker Karma with a LS9 engine.

Meanwhile, at the media preview of the Detroit auto show earlier in the week Bob Lutz and his partner Gilbert Villoreal were showing their VL Motors Destino, a Karma retrofitted with a Corvette ZR1 drivetrain, new front and rear fascias and a custom interior by seat supplier Katzskin. Lutz said that they already owned 20 Karmas to convert for a delivered price of $200,000, though they would be starting out converting customers’ cars for half that price. He said there was no shortage of Fiskers to convert. Reportedly there are about 700 unsold Karmas in either Fisker Automotive’s hands or in dealers’ stock. Lutz said at the press conference for VL Motors that earlier in the day they’d already spoken to a dealer who wanted them to convert at least 4 Karmas he had in stock.

A 638 HP LS9 V8 where a four cylinder Ecotec genset used to sit.

Lutz had been part of an attempt last spring by Wanxiang to buy Fisker. When asked by TTAC if he was part of the current bid he said that he could not comment. He did, however, comment about what possible assets Fisker could have that would be worth buying, since the heart of Fisker’s hybrid drivetrain is based on technology owned by a company (and investor in Fisker) named Quantum. In addition to the design of the Karma, it’s chassis and body, Fisker has the right to use Quantum’s serial hybrid technology providing they pay a per vehicle royalty. Lutz said that any buyer of Fisker’s assets would then have the same access to Quantum’s hybrid tech.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 7 comments
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next