Chancery Judge Rejects Fiat's Valuation of UAW VEBA's Chrysler Shares, Merger Delayed

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Sergio Marchionne’s plans to merge Chrysler and Fiat have been delayed because Fiat failed to convince a Delaware Chancery Court judge to set the value of Chrysler stock owned by the UAW’s health care fund known as VEBA. Judge Donald Parsons rejected Fiat’s request to find that a call-option agreement covering at least 54,000 Chrysler shares valued the stock at slightly less than $140 million. That decision means that the dispute over the shares’ value will now proceed to trial.

According to Bloomberg Judge Parsons ruled that Fiat officials haven’t shown the union fund “is required to deliver the shares in return for Fiat’s payment of $139.7 million. It would be premature for me to enter an order requiring” VEBA to turn the stock over to Fiat.

The decision may in fact encourage the two parties to settle the dispute, now about a year old, out of court.

The court’s decision may push Fiat and the union’s trust to find an agreement on the shares and end the dispute over the value of the holdings that’s gone on for about a year. Analysts estimate that when that agreement is eventually made, it will cost Fiat about $4 billion to take full control of the Auburn Hills automaker.

Fiat now owns 58.5 percent of Chrysler. The UAW healthcare fund came out of Chrysler’s bankruptcy owning the remaining 41.5% of the company in exchange for the union taking on the responsibility of Chrysler UAW retirees’ health care. Those responsibilities had made the UAW one of pre-bankruptcy Chrysler’s largest creditors.

Fiat puts the value of the first tranche of available union shares at ~$140 million, about $200 million shy of the UAW trust’s valuation. On the UAW’s full stake, the difference could be as much as a billion dollars. Hence the parties’ presence in Delaware Chancery Court.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 4 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 01, 2013

    I'm surprised Fiat even tried this, given that call-options are just that, OPTIONS - not a mandatory order to turn the shares over.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Aug 01, 2013

      Sergio doesn't have an extra $billion lying around, so he'll try anything to stretch what he has to cover the key part of the merger. He's done very well so far paying lowball prices for assets, so you can't blame him for trying.

  • Thanh_n Thanh_n on Aug 02, 2013

    I admit I'm unfamiliar with stocks and whatnot. I'm wondering couldn't Fiat allow the union trust to keep the 41.5%. That way, it'd be in the best interest of both parties to cooperate on future endeavors.

    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 02, 2013

      Monies in a UAW trust would benefit only the UAW workers. The money is essentially locked away in a trust - not what Chrysler wants to do with a big piece of their cash.

  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
Next