Memoirs of an Independent Auto Repair Shop Owner: World's Most Notorious Automotive Technologies, Bin Two

Phil Coconis
by Phil Coconis
memoirs of an independent auto repair shop owner world s most notorious automotive

Second in a Series, the format of which I described in the introductory remarks of Part One, this article will focus on specific modern technologies—not at all egregious in themselves—that have, in my opinion, been applied and utilized in a most egregious fashion in the modern automobile. Boldly going where no one ought to go, ON TO THE BIN!!

The Motorized Floor Mat

Laugh if you want—and I find the thought amusing, too—but it would not surprise me if we see such a technology offered to, aggressively marketed at, or just downright foisted on future auto consumers.

Way back in the early days of the “electric motorization” of the automobile, and even into later times, the elimination of manual duties often reserved for the operator/driver was often motivated out of sheer necessity. Should anybody rightfully regret the invention of the Electric Starter? It’s been considered one of the most important advances in the history of automotive development. The electric Blower Motor, used in HVAC systems since well before we started using that acronym—what else could fill the bill so well? Really, any other design employing an electric motor where safety is a priority, and there really are no other simpler viable options, is just fine with me.

Even where safety is not a concern, using motorization in the accomplishment of a task, if it both simplify the process AND enhance accuracy, reliability and serviceability—well, I’m all for it. For example: though some may argue the necessity of an EGR Valve at all, the modern motorized units ARE quite an improvement over the old vacuum operated systems they replaced.

Unfortunately, when clear-cut reasons to employ electric motorization became less apparent, rather than just leaving well enough alone, manufacturers found other reasons to justify their promotion in new and exciting areas. It started with “Power Seats” and “Power Windows”, and then escalated into the egregious.

You want that trunk lid to shut like a “luxury” car’s trunk ought to shut? With an electric motor integrated in the latch, you no longer have to use any force at all. Just set it down and the motor will do the rest for you! Want to adjust your steering column? Just lightly push the controls, and the motors will handle the grunt logistical stuff! Want to go Four-Wheelin’, but you’re not burly enough to sling a J-Pattern manual transfer case? Just push the “Soft Touch” control panel buttons, and electric motors will do all the dirty work! Had a long day hauling around the kids and Fido, and you don’t know if you’re up to dealing with hucking that large rear hatch and slinging the sliding doors on your minivan? No worries, with the advent of motorized closures!

It has come to the point that if there’s ANY potential for the user/operator (I hesitate to use the word “driver” in this context) to have difficulty with any vehicle interface, the manufacturer will unhesitatingly introduce a motorized solution to the “problem”!

Since there’s been so much in the news of late regarding the mis-positioning of the all-critical Floor Mat (the manual retainer system being apparently at the end of it’s product-cycle), the only viable solution must be to MOTORIZE IT!

When it comes to repairing and servicing these systems, experience has taught that it will be neither CONVENIENT nor INEXPENSIVE.

Ahhh, the cost to save us from ourselves…

The Computerized Cigarette Lighter

For all I know, this technology is probably being offered on some six-figure European luxo-cruiser. The way computerized technology is advancing, however, it will probably be standard equipment in your next econobox/appliance commuter car!

The point I’m making here is similar to the one I made about the over-use of electric motor technology: Computerization of (not to be confused with use of Electronics in) many automotive systems and components is unnecessary and self-defeating.

I recall the first time I had to repair a computerized power window system on a Honda. The user interface, that is, the master switch, looked almost identical to the one from the model year before. When I removed the switch from the door panel for testing, unfortunately I was greeted with unfamiliar looking sub-harness connections. Upon breaking out the brand new, never before used Service Manual (as this was a very late-model car at the time) and perusing the wiring schematic (one of the last of the wire-for-wire charts), what to my wondering eyes did appear but a Control Unit integrated into the switchgear and relays!

I was dumbfounded at the added complexity for no apparent good reason!

I had been around the wrenching end of autos since the era of power window systems employing point-to-point soldered crossovers in the switchgear, with no operational relays (except maybe for a Main Power unit). That was antique technology best left for boutique guitar amplifiers; and I was glad to see switchgear with internal metal “busses” (circuited for low-amperage duties while relays did the high-amp transmission to the motors), as they were much more reliable. But going as far as COMPUTERIZING the process—THIS was bordering on SACRILEGE!

As history has borne out, this borderline sacrilege was only beginning at that time. We now also have Computerized (in similarly unnecessary fashion): Main Power Distribution, Power Seat Control, Inside Rear View Mirrors, Anti-Theft Systems, Starter Actuation, Transmission Gearshift Selection, Automatic Climate Control, Windshield Wiper Actuation, Lighting Systems, Vehicle Stability Control, and more!

As with over-motorization, the added complexity of over-computerization has not improved simplicity, reliability, or serviceability, allowing it entry into the Pantheon of The Egregious!

Stay tuned for Part Three.

Phil Coconis is the owner of a West Coast independent auto repair shop.

Join the conversation
4 of 42 comments
  • Power6 Power6 on Jun 12, 2012

    This is great fodder for the get-off-my-lawn good ol days anti-technology contingent here! The steering wheel is motorized so that it can be tied in with the memory system. The Honda windows were computerized so that there can be an auto-up feature, they have to have travel feedback monitoring so small children won't get caught up in there. (Subaru got sued over the simpler kind) You should know how elegant and complex window wiring for 4 doors with master/slave switches are, the computerized stuff is simpler in a way. Data bus, multiplexing etc. removes complexity in an integrated system, especially the way modern cars work. You make the age old assumption that computerized/motorized means more frequent failure. Throttle by wire motors and sensors will likely outlast a cable and linkage with return spring. No doubt mfrs do this stuff to increase "features" for oohs and ahhs. Nobody needs a power liftgate but its nice. The last rental car I had, a Buick Lacrosse, turned the rear defogger on when I remote started it from the keyfob on a cold morning. Then it turned the heat blower down when I made a call over the bluetooth. None of that is easily possible if the starter relay must be closed by the ignition switch, the blower is wired through the switch to the resistor pack etc.

    • See 1 previous
    • Power6 Power6 on Jun 17, 2012

      @Phil Coconis Isn't that a little bit of cherry picking? The economics of OEM parts distribution and pricing is far from based on competitive economics. I figure I don't I have to explain how that works to you. I don't know though is 200k failure typical for an electronic throttle? Small sample size there. How many times did the IAV need to be replaced on the 92? 02 doesn't need that to idle. Did the 92 have cruise control? Lets price up the vacuum reservoir that is surely gone by 200k, and the vacuum tubing and solenoid, extra throttle cable etc. none of which the 02 has or needs to have cruise control. Imagine if the truck had Trac! My 01 Lexus ES does and it has a cute little throttle cable unit with motor that takes over the throttle. A friends older GS lexus had an entire "Trac" computer and throttle cable unit. Each part was like $1000 to replace. Any current car with traction control does it with no extra parts. I guess you could say "who needs that stuff" and in that you have a point. If you think the world should stand still then I agree keeping the technology stagnant and just iron out the bugs is great. I don't disagree that there is needless complexity from a reliability standpoint, but cars are not made to be serviced they are made to sell to buyers. Though my point is some technology is simpler, a simple auto climate control vs. the old tubes and vacuum and sliders? Carburetor vs Throttle body fuel injection? Solid state coil-on-plug vs mechanical distributor? Electronic vs. hydraulic controlled auto trans? I could go on all day... I am curious, at what point do you think things went awry? You mention you have a 92 4Runner and rag on the 02, but the 92 is a pretty electronified vehicle compare to an 82 Toyota truck. Where would you stop turning the clock back?

  • I remember reading either BMW 7-series or MB S-class had electrically powered adjustable door armrests. Ooh, it's an inch too high. Ahhh, that's better. The MB SL500 "handed" you the shoulder belt via electric motor. It was nearly impossible to reach back to the B-pillar over the high-backed buckets. Several generations ago the BMW 3-series introduced windshield wipers which pressed harder on the glass as your speed increased. How? Perhaps a pair of electric motors, linkages, sensors and such? The Austin Mini accomlished the same thing with a little airfoil on the wiper arm. Mine shucked those wiper arms almost every time I drove faster than 60 mph. So I finally replaced them with non-airfoil equipped arms. The only "automatic" functions on the Mini: self-cancelling turn signals, and the dome light which lit up when the door was open. Pretty cool, huh? Except the Lucas door switch was rusted open, so the light was purely manual.

  • Donald More stuff to break god I love having a nanny in my truck... find a good tuner and you can remove most of the stupid stuff they add like this and auto park when the doors open stupid stuff like that
  • John Williams Sounds like a Burnout Special you can put together on any 5.0 F150. Whoever said this was Cars and Coffee bait is right on the money.
  • ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 (  Bronze or  Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the  Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??
  • Scott "It may not be the ideal hauler to take the clan cross-country to Wally World considering range anxiety "Range Anxiety is a chosen term that conceals as much as it discloses. You don't care about range that much if you can recharge quickly and current BV's (battery vehicles) can't, no matter how good the chargers are. From what I've been reading it is likely that within 5 years there will be batteries in cars, most likely Tesla's, that can charge fast enough with no harm to the batteries to satisfy all of us with no need to increase range beyond a real world 300-ish miles.And that's when I buy one.
  • Charles I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van