Junkyard Find: 1986 Saab 900

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Before I moved to Colorado from California, two years ago this June, I became accustomed to seeing Saab 900s in large quantities in every self-service junkyard I visited. The 900 was a big seller in California (as was the Volvo 240), and you’d always find a half-dozen or so at the bigger yards. The 900 is a much rarer beast in Colorado; I see the occasional lovingly preserved example on the street, but this is the only junked example I’ve seen in a few months.

The turbocharged 900s were more popular, especially here at altitude, but quite a few naturally-aspirated versions were sold.

290,000 miles— pretty good for a mid-80s car.

One thing I’ve learned working 24 Hours of LeMons races is that the 900 is one of the quickest cars of its era when you put it on a road course; the non-turbo 900 is respectably fast and the turbocharged version will obliterate most BMW E30s and even the shockingly quick Alfa Romeo Milano… until the transmission (or engine, or suspension, or electrical system) breaks, which tends to happen early and often. At least the California Saab racers have no shortage of junkyard parts!





Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Ashy Larry Ashy Larry on Apr 25, 2012

    I had a 1987 900 4 door, with the 8v 110 hp engine, for 11 years from 1993 until 2004. It was for all intents and purposes the same as this junked one, except for the bodystyle and the flight revision to the front end and bumpers to make them more aerodynamic. Bought it with 82k miles, dumped it with well over 250k miles. It was alittle fussy (goddam vacuum hoses and FI system made for nightmarish idle adjustments), but otherwise stout, perfect for errand running, comfortable, durable and funky, with just enough exhaust burble and gear whine / drivetrain lash to annoucne to the world that somethign special was coming down the road. Amazing turn radius. I plowed through several blizzards where I passed SUV's stuck in ditches. Even in non-hatchback form it could haul a shet of plywood on its flat trunk floor with the rear seat folded down. never ceased to entertain me. Such was the "soul" of the car that it was like a family member -- I shed a tear when I sold it, and then I saw it back on the road twice in the subsequent years, which made me happy and jealous for the new owner. Wonderful cars, ne'er to be duplicated.

  • Difilippo6680 Difilippo6680 on Dec 04, 2014

    For those of you that are interested, I moved abroad in june 2014. Before doing so I owned a white 1986 SAAB 900S non turbo exactly like the one pictured above, except 4 door instead of 2. My God what a car it was, wanted to sell it on ebay but never got to it so I finally had the local junk yard in wilmington NC pick it up. If its still there, please make some use of it, that is the real ultimate machine, and the only asset that I had an emotional attachment to. What a car. Its at a sort a pull and pay kinda place off of highway 421 in wilmington nc, let me know if any of you found it

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next