Blame It On Sergio: Fiat Flirting With PSA?

by Bertel Schmitt

Published: January 11th, 2012

blame it on sergio fiat flirting with psa

Sergio Marchionne always had been a proponent of the “the world only has room for six large global automakers” theory. Fiat and Chrysler isn’t necessarily a marriage between two robust partners. Especially in the Asian growth markets, both are weak. According to Italy’s Corriere Della Sera, Marchionne is rekindling a years-old flirt with France’s PSA Peugeot Citroen. Of course, none of the presumably dating companies will confirm the rumor. However, the rumor was started by Sergio Marchionne himself, in Detroit.

On Monday, Marchionne, adorned with sweater, knitted scarf and a hedgehog-like three-day beard, told Reuters that

“he would be willing, in principle, to be part of a consolidation that would create another car company in Europe rivaling Volkswagen AG in size.

“If you take two of the European players and put them together, you’re going to get the right answer,” Marchionne said.”

Rivaling Volkswagen AG in size in Europe is a tall order. Last we looked, Volkswagen AG had 23 percent of the European market, followed by the PSA group holding 13 percent. And this is either how the rumor started, or it is a well-placed scent laid by Marchionne. The Fiat Group has 7 percent of the European market. If you add both together, you are approaching VW territory.

No other group would bring the right answer. Renault has its own alliance. GM will stay as far away as possible from Fiat. Ford – forget it. We are already in mathematically rough territory: An unlikely merger of Ford and Fiat for instance would only produce a total of 15 percent market share, not even getting close to VW. The only suitor immediately fitting Marchionne’s formula is PSA.

Rumors of PSA and Fiat playing footsie are nearly as old as TTAC. In 2008, they were reported to be engaged in heavy petting. In the following year, they were seen holding hands again. Then, Chrysler commanded Marchionne’s full attention. With Chrysler secured, there is room for new engagements. Globally, PSA would be a decent fit: The company has no presence in the U.S. It also has two joint ventures in China, both with heavy hitters: One with Changan, the other with Dongfeng.

Dongfeng would be a delicate situation: It is also a prized JV with Nissan. Carlos Ghosn doesn’t think too highly of Marchionne.

#BertelSchmitt #Chrysler #Fiat #France #Italy #Marchionne #PSA

Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 6 comments

Obruni on Jan 11, 2012

would the French government allow this to happen? I doubt it. and the competition within the group in Europe would be unmanageable. slightly amusing: if this does go through, Mitsubishi and Chrysler would be sharing platforms and technology again. its like a time warp going back 15 years.

Like Reply
Rpn453 on Jan 11, 2012

That three-day beard puts my two-week beard to shame!

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.