Hammer Time: War Without Tears

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang
hammer time war without tears

The leather still has that fragrant smell of dead thick cow skin and the interior offers a better living space than many Manhattan apartments. It only has 104,000 original miles after 21 pampered years on the smooth roads of North Georgia. Everything about it is world class. But as soon as I utter the name BMW, some of you will be instantly turned off. A Yuppiemobile. A prestigious status symbol loaded with whatever arrogance and hubris the Germans can muster. Not to mention that it’s not a Lexus, or a Jaguar, or a….

Pontiac? Don’t you guys know that Americans can’t build world class machines! Well of course there’s the Corvette, the Silverado, the F150, the Suburban, the Fiesta, the G8, the….Actually come to think of it. Didn’t the Cavalier and Sunfire whip the Tercel and Echo for a good ten years? Hasn’t Honda learned that they can’t make a pickup to save their axe from first base? Nissan? Weren’t they bailed out by the French?

Not to dedicate the rest of this write-up to anything from France. But when I think of France and cars, I can’t help but think of that wondrous vehicle known as LeCar. A hamster powered tin box that can be outrun by Rabbits. Both American and Mexican.

Renault only saved Nissan because like any good company based in a left-leaning country, they kept on making cheaper versions of the very same car year after year. The ‘E Pluribus Versa’ strategy is brilliant for a lower end vehicle when everyone else that competes with it tries to go upscale. For higher end vehicles like the Titan, Quest, Armada, Sentra and Maxima the cheap and frumpy approach fails. The only thing worse than a Renault/Nissan would be an all French car like the Peugeot.. or perhaps …

Korean cars. Those of you who think that some Korean car making prince snapped his fingers and turned the shitboxed Excel into a high quality Accent are drinking from our national media’s Kool-Aid. The same Jim Jones concoction that made Consumer Reports recommend the Volkswagen Passat back in the late-90’s. It’s a big lie. Korean cars have not redefined anything except another flavor of Toyota vanilla in the marketplace.

Most of our media outlets only care about the ‘trendy’ and ‘different’. They aren’t going to mention that the Panther cars are exceptionally durable or that Chrysler is nearly back to owning half the minivan market. Only in the American media is ‘Detroit’ the ‘enemy’ and the purveyor of all things uncool. Which brings me to what everyone thinks of when they hear about Detroit and it’s inner city.

The Chinese. Why couldn’t these Mao worshiping, North Korean supporting warmongers quit whoring out our middle class. Americans love cheap crap… God bless our 99 cent ‘value’ menus… and we can still offer a ton of it to the developing world. From Walmart to Waffle House, we should export our talents through any means possible. (ED: Consider it done. There is a huge Walmart across the street from me in Beijing. There’s a 7-Eleven in my building. KFC opens up one new chicken store per day in China. Yesterday, I came back from the Beijing airport, and what did I see? An Outlet Mall! For a minute I thought I had been dreaming and I’m still shopping at Tanger Mall in Riverhead. The empire definitely strikes back.)

But we can’t. Why? Because the Chinese will steal, cheat, lie, devalue their currency and generally do all the other things that our leaders and CEO’s pretend not to do. No matter what language you speak, cheap always has a price.

Hmmm… speaking of cheap. Korean cars were cheap once. Some still are. The Japanese made a ton of cheap cars, cameras, and watches. German cars were once cheap… and so were many American cars. From Models A and T. To the Neon and Cobalt. Everyone has some type of competitive edge in this business. In the beginning and end it’s usually ‘cheap’.

Do we need to be protected from a ‘cheap’ bogeyman that is well over a century old? I think we do. The cost will be shutting our goods to a more competitive and far larger global market. But protectionism will ensure our success, as surely as it did in the 1930’s.

Truth be told the only real demon we’re fighting right now is a two-party political machine that ensures minimal competition to those who sponsor it. If you want to make American cars competitive, don’t worry about Detroit. Worry about a government that will do the bidding of anyone who is willing to pay for the privilege.

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Sam P Sam P on Oct 04, 2010

    "The Detroit Three frittered away a 90-percent 1955 market share by accepting good enough instead of striving for excellence." Plus, in 1955, most Americans hadn't ever sampled what the foreign automakers had to offer. The Jaguar Mark I was priced in the upper end Buick/low end Cadillac price range and would utterly destroy the Detroit barges of the time on the road with its 3.4 liter XK 6-cylinder engine and manual gearbox. But most American car buyers of the time were awfully unadventurous and just wanted the next big wallowing barge out of the local domestic showroom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_Mark_1

    • Geeber Geeber on Oct 04, 2010

      In 1955, foreign cars were still inferior to the domestics. They were DIFFERENT, but not necessarily better. On a long-distance trip, that Jaguar (or most other foreign cars) would have broken down within the first 100 miles, while the Detroit vehicle would have still been going strong. Detroit's engines were the most reliable, trouble-free and low maintenance power plants in the world through the early 1970s. Plus, foreign automatics, air conditioning and power assists were a joke compared to what the Big Three were offering. And, yes, I understand that most enthusiasts like manuals, but most Americans didn't at that time, and still don't. Same with air conditioning and power windows, doors, seats and locks. Which is why any foreign make that wanted to succeed in this country had to offer those features (and make them reliable).

  • DC Bruce DC Bruce on Oct 04, 2010

    I'm not going to jump on the French-car bashing bandwagon. I recall renting a Peugot 504 (?) turbo sedan in 1985 and thinking that it was a very nice car, with a supple suspension and a better implementation of a turbocharger than the Volvo of the same vintage, which operated very much like an on-off switch. The challenge for any imported car during the "early years" was having a decent dealer network with mechanics who could maintain and service the cars. And, as others have noted, the second challenge was catering to American tastes, which meant air conditioning and automatic transmissions for all but the "economy" market. For quite a long while, European cars fell down in those two areas. I think that is the reason that the most successful imports from the early years were those that attacked the economy end of the market. Buyer expectations were that the cars had to be economical, that is not expensive to buy (compared to the domestic product) and they had to be cheap to operate, which meant low gas consumption and reliaiblity. The original VW Beetle and the early Toyotas and Datsuns (Nissan) met those criteria, as did Honda, when it came in. Except for VW, which fumbled the transition away from air-cooled, rear-engine cars rather badly, the other companies worked off this base to move upmarket successfully.

  • FifaCup Loving both Interior and exterior designs.
  • FifaCup This is not good for the auto industry
  • Jeff S This would be a good commuter vehicle especially for those working in a large metropolitan area. The only thing is that by the time you put airbags, backup cameras, and a few of the other required safety features this car would no longer be simple and the price would be not much cheaper than a subcompact. I like the idea but I doubt a car like this would get marketed in anyplace besides Europe and the 3rd World.
  • ScarecrowRepair That's what I came to say!
  • Inside Looking Out " the plastic reinforced with cotton waste used on select garbage vehicles assembled by the Soviet Union. "Wrong. The car you are talking about was the product German engineering, East German. It's name was Trabant.
Next