BMW's (Ob)noxious Ad Shot Down

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

The RAC (that’s the Royal version of the AAA, in case you don’t know) reports that BMW has run into trouble with the UK Advertising Standards Agency (ASA, that’s no film speed in the UK) with one of their adverts. In it, BMW claimed that its Z4 roadster had low levels of CO2 (you know CO2? That obnoxious gas which every government in the world is trying to reduce/tax?). The advert reads “Joy makes the most of every drop…So you can step on the accelerator, knowing Joy will minimise the CO2 emissions.” The advert ends with “BMW EfficientDynamics, Less emissions, More driving pleasure.” This riled two people enough to complain to the ASA. Now what could have been so contentious…?

Well, the answer to that question lies in the small print of the advert. In it, BMW states quite clearly that the car in question (a BMW Z4 sDrive 35is Roadster) emits 210g/km. Now to give this some context, 210g/km is band K in the UK car tax system (did I mention tax?), only 2 below the highest tax band. Hardly a Toyota Prius. Well, it seems BMW had a different interpretation of the advert. They argued that they were comparing the Z4 against the previous generation Z4. They also argued that the Z4 had the lowest emissions of any of its competitors’ comparable models. The ASA came down in favour of the complainers, citing that readers were likely to assume that BMW’s claims were a comparison against all cars and not just cars in its class. “Because an emission rate of 210 g/km was relatively high for any car, despite being lower than BMW’s previous model and some competitors’ similar specification vehicles, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead without further qualification.” ASA said. It does make me wonder, though. Who’s looking at an advert for a sportscar and thinking “Wow! I’m killing the planet with my Insight! I’ve gotta get me that 3 litre, 6 cylinder roadster!”.

Wasn’t that one also banned? Picture courtesy hypebeast.com

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Jul 22, 2010

    I love that they have laws against misleading advertising. That's like laws against fish breathing water.

  • Ott Ott on Jul 22, 2010

    It's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next