Florida, Washington, France: Traffic Cameras Face Legal and Accuracy Problems

by The Newspaper

February 8th, 2010 11:46 AM

florida washington france traffic cameras face legal and accuracy problems

Photo enforcement machines around the world this week were found to be ticketing drivers who had malfunctioned, ticketed motorists who had done nothing wrong, or the machines themselves were found to be in violation of the law.

In Collier County, Florida on Friday, the private vendor American Traffic Solutions was working to install more red light cameras even though at least some of the already-installed devices had gone out-of-control, flashing nearly every passing motorist. The Marco Eagle reported that the cameras at the intersection of Immokalee and Airport-Pulling Roads, in addition to Immokalee and Livingston Roads, began malfunctioning early in the week.

“American Traffic Solutions is aware of the issues with the two cameras in Collier County,” ATS spokesman Ellen Pence told the Eagle. “We are taking this issue very seriously. Our local technicians have been on site, and we realize that a few of our signal detectors need to be readjusted to return to normal functioning. We are working to accomplish that as quickly as possible, and hopefully the issue will be fixed no later than mid-day tomorrow.”

No citations were issued as a result of the faulty sensors in this particular case, but automated tickets issued in Florida rest on shaky legal ground. A number of class action lawsuits are fighting red light camera programs on the ground that the state attorney general, the state department of transportation, and even red light camera vendor Redflex Traffic Systems agree that photo enforcement is illegal in Florida ( view Redflex statement, page 6, 1.8mb PDF).

In Seattle, Washington, Judge Francis deVilla ruled on Monday that a red light camera citation issued at the intersection of 45th Street at Union Bay Place was illegal, KING-TV reported. Under state law, such cameras are only allowed at four-way intersections, but the location in question was a five-way intersection. Afraid of refunding the 9000 tickets worth $1.1 million, the city is ignoring deVilla’s ruling, as well as a prior ruling by Judge Adam Eisenberg that found the ticketing location in violation of state law.

A French camera falsely accused motorists of speeding in Rouillac on the road to St. Jean d’Angely on January 14. Although the speed limit at the location was 70 km/h (44 MPH) the camera was set to ticket vehicles traveling at 50 km/h (31 MPH), Charente Libre reported. Under French law, any motorist wishing to challenge an automated citation had to pay it first. A large number of outraged motorists began complaining until the Mayor of Rouillac, Michel Trainaud, was forced last week to refund every ticket issued on that day.v

#Government #RedLightCameras #Safety #SpeedCameras

Comments

Join the conversation

3 comments

PeriSoft on Feb 08, 2010

"Photo enforcement machines around the world this week were found to be ticketing drivers who had malfunctioned..." You know, I've been driving for a while, but I don't think I've ever malfunctioned. Are they ticketing robot drivers now, or is there some new infraction I'm not aware of? :)

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- SunnyvaleCA on Feb 08, 2010
  
  The primary job of the driver is to safely pilot the vehicle. If the driver's malfunction led to an at-fault crash, they should get a ticket. This seems reasonable to me. (Yeah, I thought the opening sentence was a little awkward too, especially the non-parallel construction: "ticketed," "ticketing," and "were found.")
  
  Like
- FreedMike on Feb 08, 2010
  
  @ Edward Niedemeyer: You might want to fix that sentence, dude...:) Otherwise, good article.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Scott "It may not be the ideal hauler to take the clan cross-country to Wally World considering range anxiety "Range Anxiety is a chosen term that conceals as much as it discloses. You don't care about range that much if you can recharge quickly and current BV's (battery vehicles) can't, no matter how good the chargers are. From what I've been reading it is likely that within 5 years there will be batteries in cars, most likely Tesla's, that can charge fast enough with no harm to the batteries to satisfy all of us with no need to increase range beyond a real world 300-ish miles.And that's when I buy one.
Charles I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van
Jay Mason Your outdoor space will get better every year with a pergola. A horizontal, pole-supported framework for climbing plants is called a pergola. It creates a closed off area. pergola builder denton texas by Denton Custom Decks provide cover for outdoor gatherings. They would be more than happy to assist you with the pergola's framework.
Alan I would think Ford would beef up the drive line considering the torque increase, horse power isn't a factor here. I looked at a Harrop supercharger for my vehicle. Harrop offered two stages of performance. The first was a paltry 100hp to the wheels (12 000AUD)and the second was 250hp to the wheels ($20 000 (engine didn't rev harder so torque was significantly increased)). The Stage One had no drive line changes, but the Stage Two had drive line modifications. My vehicle weighs roughly the same as a full size pickup and the 400'ish hp I have is sufficient, I had little use for another 100 let alone 250hp. I couldn't see much difference in the actual supercharger setup other than a ratio change for the drive of the supercharger, so that extra $8 000 went into the drive line.
ToolGuy Question: F-150 FP700 ( Bronze or Black) supercharger kit is legal in 50 states, while the Mustang supercharger kit is banned in California -- why??