(When) Will China Boot Foreign Car Manufacturers?

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When I came to China for the first time in 2004, after-work congregations of foreign executives who worked for Chinese auto joint ventures usually went like this: Someone muttered into his Tsingtao beer, or something stronger: “The Chinese will want us out within eight years.” Upon hearing this, all others around him nodded gravely, and another round was ordered. Over the years, more and more expats were sent home to Detroit, Wolfsburg, and Aichi. The silly “twin” system (a foreigner and a Chinese on the same job) stopped. Of course, the open secret was never officially discussed, but the outcome appeared to be inevitable: The days of the foreigners are numbered.

It will be 2010 within a few weeks, and the foreign (U.S., European; Japanese) joint ventures are still seemingly safely ensconced in China. As reported umpteen times at TTAC, China has become a strategically important market for most auto manufacturers. Nobody thinks anymore that come 2012, China will kick all joint venture partners out.

Yet, here is the first step in that general direction:



By 2015, China wants half of passenger cars, including sport utility vehicles, sold in China to be self-developed by Chinese automakers, the Shanghai Securities News says (via Gasgoo.) No sources are named, but the paper is owned by the Chinese government.

50 percent homegrown by 2015 is no ambitious goal. Currently, 44 percent of all passenger cars sold in China don’t carry a foreign badge. Six percent more in 5 years, big deal.

With sedans, the matter becomes more interesting. Indigenous sedans hold a 29 percent share of the Chinese market, according to official data cited in the report. The Chinese government wants to see that share grow to 40 percent of the market by 2015.

In the first half of 2010, the Chinese government is expected to publish guidelines to the above effect. The guidelines are also expected to demand that Chinese companies hold at least 50 percent of any newly-formed joint ventures that make alternative energy cars, batteries and key components. This pours water on the hopes of foreign automakers that they could some day be the sole owner of a Chinese car manufacturer. It’s going in the opposite direction.

The bottom line is that the car executives who were crying in their beers were wrong (again…) and that the status quo will continue in the foreseeable future, albeit with a gradual, step-by-step Sinofication..

Anyway, many supposedly “domestic” cars rely heavily on foreign platforms, foreign technology, and sometimes heavy foreign design inspirations. Witness the parts of Saab being carted off to Beijing, where they will emerge as allegedly domestic cars. The total domestication of the Chinese car industry will take much, much longer. But one thing becomes clear: In the long run, China wants to stand on its own four wheels when it comes to cars. The guidelines (if they will be as reported …) will be the first official step in that direction.

Will China Boot Foreign Car Manufacturers?

When I came to China for the first time in 2004, after-work congregations of foreign executives who worked for Chinese auto joint ventures usually went like this: Someone muttered into his Tsingtao beer, or something stronger: “The Chinese will want us out within eight years.” Upon hearing this, all others around him nodded gravely, and another round was ordered. Over the years, more and more expats were sent home to Detroit, Wolfsburg, and Aichi. The silly “twin” system (a foreigner and a Chinese on the same job) stopped. Of course, the open secret was never officially discussed, but the outcome appeared to be inevitable: The days of the foreigners are numbered.

It will be 2010 within a few weeks, and the foreign (U.S., European; Japanese) joint ventures are still seemingly safely ensconced in China. As reported umpteen times at TTAC, China has become a strategically important market for most auto manufacturers. Nobody thinks anymore that come 2012, China will kick all joint venture partners out.

Yet, here is the first small step in that general direction:

By 2015, China wants half of passenger cars, including sport utility vehicles, sold in China to be self-developed by Chinese automakers, the Shanghai Securities News says (via Gasgoo.) No sources are named, but the paper is owned by the Chinese government.

50 percent homegrown by 2015 is no ambitious goal. Currently, 44 percent of all passenger cars sold in China don’t carry a foreign badge. Six percent more in 5 years, big deal.

With sedans, the matter becomes more interesting. Indigenous sedans hold a 29 percent share of the Chinese market, according to official data cited in the report. The Chinese government wants to see that share grow to 40 percent of the market by 2015.

In the first half of 2010, the Chinese government is expected to publish guidelines to the above effect. The guidelines are also expected to demand that Chinese companies hold at least 50 percent of any newly-formed joint ventures that make alternative energy cars, batteries and key components. This pours water on the hopes of foreign automakers that they could some day be the sole owner of a Chinese car manufacturer. It’s going in the opposite direction.

The bottom line is that the car executives who were crying in their beers were wrong (again…) and that the status quo will continue in the foreseeable future, albeit with a gradual, step-by-step Chinesification..

Anyway, many supposedly “domestic” cars rely heavily on foreign platforms, foreign technology, and sometimes heavy foreign design inspirations. Witness the parts of Saab being carted off to Beijing, where they will emerge as allegedly domestic cars. The total domestication of the Chinese car industry will take much, much longer. But one thing becomes clear: In the long run, China wants to stand on its own four wheels when it comes to cars. The guidelines (if they will be as reported …) will be the first official step in that direction.

NOFORN in Chinese. Picture courtesy angelgracia.com

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Ra_pro Ra_pro on Dec 17, 2009

    2 very important issues that are not discussed much: 1) China has aging population. Aging populations don't produce scientific breakthroughs and neither do they produce great strides in technological achievement. That's why Chinese need all the technology they can buy or steal whichever is cheaper and easier. 2) China's environment is bad as it is and it's not gonna get better. In fact it will be a lot worse if the economy is allowed the current expansion. Between these 2 issues China will have a hard time just staying the manufacturing hub of the world it is now where workers produce what workers in other countries buy. But I think the Chinese dreams of glory may get the better of them which just may save the GM or VW. Or maybe not.

  • Pf21 Pf21 on Dec 17, 2009

    1) Aging population is a problem for Japan and Europe, not for China. The natural birth rate in China is much higher than Japan, Europe, and U.S. if immigration is excluded. All China has to do is to relax the one-child policy, and lower the legal marriage age a little bit (20/22, F/M currently). BTW, having more children is a sure way to boost consumption. 2) Cleaning up the environment over a course of 30-40 years is no big deal either. It probably will lower Chinese GDP less than 1% every year over the period. Remember, there is no lump-sum payment due for environmental damage!

  • Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
  • SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
  • Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
  • SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
  • Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.
Next