Moneybags GM to Cover Clunker Deals
General Motors has announced that it will lend dealers cash to cover their government clunker rebates for 30 days while the NHTSA figures out how to wind down the program. “We want to do all we can to provide customers with timely new vehicle deliveries and dealers the liquidity they need to run their businesses,” says Mark LaNeve in a company press release. “This will continue the sales momentum of our new fuel-efficient vehicles such as the Chevrolet Cobalt, Equinox and Buick Enclave.” Or, it could mean dealers will end up owing GM instead of the government owing them.
According to GM spokesfolks paraphrased by Automotive News [sub], “GM will offer the loan for any clunker deal deemed by the dealership to qualify, whether or not the government has given formal approval. The dealer must repay the loan within 30 days or GM will take the money owed back from the dealer’s open account with the automaker” [emphasis added]. If, as the NHTSA alleges, a large number of deals aren’t ending up qualifying, GM’s dealers will be in trouble no matter what. Would you rather wait for the government to pay you, or end up on the hook to GM? What a fun choice that is.
Ford and Chrysler have not made any decision to advance clunker cash to its dealers, but Hyundai was smart and started doing it before the program even began. Which might help explain why the money went so fast. Toyota Financial now pre-approves dealers in good standing for a special clunker credit line, while American Honda Financial is allowing dealers to deduct the amount of the rebate when the dealer pays off the inventory loan on a vehicle. At this point though, waiting for the NHTSA to sort out the tiny details (you know, like how much money is actually left) might not be a bad idea.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Burnbomber GM front driver A-bodies. They are the Chevy Celebrity, Pontiac 6000, Oldsmobile Ciera, and Buick Century (5th Generation). These are a derivative from the much maligned Chevrolet Citation, but they got this generation good. My 1st connection was in a daily 80 mile car pool,always riding in the back seat, in a stripper Pontiac 6000. It was a nice ride, quiet and roomy. Then I changed jobs and had a Chevy Celebrity as a company car. They were heavy duty strippers with a better than average GM feel (from F40 heavy-duty suspension option). I bought 2 ex-company cars at auction--one for my family and one for mother-in-law. They were extremely reliable, parts dirt cheap (especially in u-pulls), and simple to work on. It was the most reliable GM I've ever owned; better than my current Chevy Equinox, which will take a miracle to last as long as they did.
- Slavuta Drivers in Bharat are better. Considering that rules are accepted as mere suggestions and a mix of car, bicycle, motorbike, pedestrian at the same place and time, these guys are virtuosos.
- Grandmaster T Tesla Cybertruck?
- Ava169189168 NO driver, at any age, should get a license without completing a Driver's Ed course.
- Golden2husky My HS friend's family had a Wagoneer. These SUVs, plus the next gen that replaced it, were very much front and center in affluent neighborhoods. They were a tough as an anvil, and about as sophisticated. What this poor truck was put through was a testament to how rugged it was. We needed the "emergency" switch in the glove box on more than one occasion to get moving. Sadly, he flipped it in a parking lot - going fast in reverse and cutting the wheel hard. Tons of tire squealing, then silence. It's over so I thought until we landed on the roof and front of hood. I watched the windshield shatter and we ended up on our side. Stupid things kids will do. The Wagoneer took on a decidedly TR-7 look after the rollover.
Comments
Join the conversation
Actually, the Monopoly man's name is "Rich Uncle Pennybags". The budgeted amount for C4C was what, $3 billion? How much was the bailout to Wall Street? IIRC it is now somewhere north of $1 trillion. C4C is a drop in the bucket, and is probably going to end up somewhat mitigating the highs and lows of the economic cycle for a return to what passes for normal. If the federal government ends up on the hook for another $200 or so million, it's to be expected from a government program that initially had amorphous guidelines at best.