Obama Continues Bush Push for Toll Roads

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
obama continues bush push for toll roads

Despite early indications that the Obama Administration did not want to follow the toll road policies of the previous administration, the US Department of Transportation is spending millions in federal taxpayer dollars to encourage states to impose tolls on new and existing roads. On Monday, the DOT published formal rules for states interested in applying to receive $1.5 billion in federal tax grants under the new “Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery” program. “TIGER discretionary funding will open up the door to many new innovative and cutting-edge transportation projects,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.

The rule published in the Federal Register gave as examples of “innovative” projects those that use “dynamic pricing” and “radio frequency identification (RFID)” tracking devices on vehicles. The notice goes on to explain that grant applicants must have “legislative authority to charge user fees or set toll rate” if the project involves tolling.

LaHood also announced last Thursday that the department would bankroll a number of toll road feasibility studies using $6 million in federal gas tax dollars under the department’s Value Pricing Program.

In the San Francisco, California Bay Area, $3.2 million would be spent to encourage tolls on State Route 237. In Washington state, $1.3 million would be spent on a study of tolling in the Puget Sound region. In Minnesota, federal taxpayers would pay $400,000 to create a study showing the benefits of imposing tolls on Interstate 94. Finally, $717,000 in federal tax dollars would be spent on a study of GPS-based per-mile tolling for trucks in New York.

The latter grant is unusual because the White House explicitly backed away from the concept of nationwide per-mile taxes when LaHood first floated the idea in February.

“I can weigh in on it and say that it is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration,” Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said on February 20.

Prior to the White House policy statement, LaHood had been quite explicit in his support for a policy of imposing tolls on drivers with rhetoric indistinguishable from that of his predecessor, former Transportation Secretary Mary Peters. Now LaHood is once again providing vocal support for tolls. Last week he sent a signal to the New York state legislature and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to revive the failed effort to impose a tax of up to $22 for cars and trucks entering downtown Manhattan. In an interview with NY1 News, LaHood promised that the $350 million in federal tax money would be available as a financial reward if the city imposes the toll.

“The money that was going to be provided for that particular project is still at the Department of Transportation,” LaHood told NY1. “If New York got its act together around that kind of opportunity, I think we would look at it.”

Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on May 20, 2009
    the point is that taxes pay for all sorts of services. Well, my question still stands - any idea of that $258B that was the Highway bill a few years ago, how much actually was spent on highway repair, retrofit or new roads? I don't know either. For some reason, that info sure is hard to come by. I wonder why. Yet here comes another gov't representative selling smoke and mirrors about how this time the money really will be spent on the roads. Sure.

  • on May 20, 2009

    Toll Roads are the worst thing this government can encourage. I would rather have marijuana legalized than have toll roads. Higher cafe and toll roads... I can't believe those conspiracy theorists about the left wing are coming true through incremental socialism. Essentially take people out of their cars and group them into large cities where they can be controlled. Welcome to the future, the ghetto with big brother.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird In 1986 the Yugo was listed as $3990, which was the lowest priced car in America at the time. The base Hyundai Excel was listed at $1k more at $4995. I knew someone at the time who purchased a base Excel hatchback in red with a four speed. I think he added an aftermarket stereo. He was trading in a Renault Alliance that he purchased a few years earlier for about $5k.
  • SCE to AUX Good summary.I still think autonomous driving should be banned until some brave mfr claims Level 5 capability, and other distractions like games and videos should only be available for stationary vehicles.As for the A/C, I just turn a knob in my Hyundai EV.
  • MrIcky My bet is flood.
  • Lou_BC "A Stellantis employee recommended the change after they had a near-miss with an emergency vehicle they couldn’t hear."I was at a traffic light and the car next to me had the stereo cranked. My whole truck was vibrating. A firetruck was approaching lights and sirens. They should have seen it since it was approaching from their side. Light changed and they went. It was almost a full on broad-side. People are stupid. A green light at an intersection does not mean it is safe to go. You still have to look especially at a "fresh" green. Idiots run the light, an emergency vehicle is coming, or it's icy and vehicles can't stop.
  • Lou_BC My kids drove around in a 2 wheel drive Chevy Colorado crew cab I bought off a neighbour when they were moving to Alberta. We kept it 4 years but sold it recently due to various engine codes popping up and the engine sounding more tired. It was one of the inline 5's known to have soft valve seats. All I had to repair was new front brakes and rotors, a wheel bearing and a battery. Both kids wrecked a tire clipping a curb. My oldest backed into it with his pickup which required a grill and headlight replacement. We bought a 2008 Corolla as a replacement for my 19 year old. It came with 4 new summers and a set of decent winter tires on rims. We'll run that until it looks like it will implode/explode. My oldest currently has 3 Cherokees (2 for parts), an F150 "Jelly bean", and a Mercury Grand Marquis. Insurance is very expensive for young drivers. That's why beaters can save some money. I haven't put them on my new truck's insurance since that would add around 90 per month in costs. I'll add my oldest to it temporarily so he can use it to get his "full" driver's license.