Editorial: Curbside Classic: Pontiac Trans Sport and Transvertible
Curbside Classics is all about serendipity. Good thing too, because how else would I be inspired to write 800 words about the Pontiac Trans Sport? And I don’t just mean stumbling across this bizarre Transvertible. Well, yes, that was good. But I also needed a regular Trans Sport to complement this flight of fancy. Easy, and boring enough. But take a look at the paperback tucked into the dash: John Steinbeck’s “The Wayward Bus”. Two for Two.
Steinbeck’s pessimistic story revolves around the stories of several “stuck” personalities, waiting at Rebel Corners for the
broken-down bus “Sweetheart”. We’ll skip all the human drama that can happen in one evening, and get back on the bus, after Sweetheart finally is running again.
It’s a rainy night, and the bridge to their “destination” is deemed unsafe. The choice put to the passengers by Juan, the driver, is to return to Rebel Corners, or take a dirt road. They choose the road. En route, he deliberately runs the bus into a ditch, telling the passengers it was an accident. After some more drama, the bus eventually heads for its destination. The passengers have resolved to make changes in their lives. Will they? And has a better metaphor for GM and the Pontiac Trans Sport ever been written?
Enough with the literary allegories. The Trans Sport was based on Pontiac’s 1986 eponymous concept. Yes, GM’s excitement division was given the lead in coming up with a response to the fabulously successful Caravan/Voyager mini-vans. The result was essentially a deliberate drive into
the ditch. Whereas Chrysler’s boxy family haulers were all about practicality, GM’s were about . . . well, what where they about?
GM’s had a curse when it comes to people haulers. It could never get past its Jetsons Motorama styling tendencies or technical overkill/suicide. Or both, simultaneously, like in this 1955 L’Universelle. The task was to come up with a VW bus competitor. The result: so baroque, complicated and expensive, with a FWD system powered by a Pontiac V8 engine, that it could not be put into production.
The Corvair Greenbrier almost got it right. Actually, it was a nifty piece of work, one of my favorites, and merits its own CC feature. But profitability was always the devil with the relatively complicated Corvair, especially compared to the cart-axle Econoline. GM’s equally dumb and cheap Chevy Van/GMC HandiVan soon killed the Greenbrier.
And history repeats itself, especially at GM, which seems to specialize in corporate amnesia. The Trans Sport concept was ambitious stylistically and in its packaging, gull doors and all. And it was built on GM’s vaunted space-frame technology, first pioneered on the Pontiac Fie
ro. If GM had done it right, they would have figured out a way to make a more prosaic boxy Chevy Lumina to compete against the Caravan, while still building a swoopy Trans Sport for the lovers of exciting mini-vans. All eighteen of them.
Instead, the dust-buster was badge engineered for Chevy and Oldsmobile too, for their um . . . oh, yes, the highly forgettable Silhouette. And they all were a big royal flop. And GM did the predictable: responded with the next generation minivans so conservatively styled to be utterly invisible.
But in GM’s desperation to salvage the first generation Trans Sport, radical ideas were solicited from the marketing mavens and development experts. A few niches were discovered and described, and the result was several prototypes were commissioned, including this “Transvertible”. Why not an open-air mini-van? And not really a convertible either, as a folding top for a van was
way beyond the technical expertise of the vaunted GM “skunk works.”
To be sold only in the Sun Belt, the Transvertible had a completely water-proof interior, borrowed from the boating industry. In fact, an advanced amphibious version was underway when the metaphorical plug was pulled on that overly-ambitious project. The prototype was last seen being towed out on a lake near the GM proving grounds, due to the difficulty in engineering a driveshaft for the proposed propeller.
But the “conventional” Transvertible prototype has survived, and miraculously ended up just blocks from my house. I’ve always hoped to run across a vaunted GM Motorama concept, like a Futureliner, but living in Eugene, I feel mighty privileged to be able walk past the Transvertible anytime I feel the need to steep myself in GM’s creative genius.
Speaking of steeping, Eugene’s rainy winters have not been overly kind to the interior components of the open-air concept. Perhaps that’s why it’s here, as part of a long-term weathering test. Although, according to a neighbor, it’s there because of “something to do with a divorce.”
Now that’s hard to figure. How could anyone’s wife not want to make sure she ended up with the ’vertible as part of a divorce settlement? Oh well; her loss is my serendipitous gain.
More by Paul Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 1995 SC I have DeWalt 18v stuff for tools to include impact. Haven't had any issues but I needed a little more for some of the yard stuff so have an EGO edger and weed eater.
- Dwford I'm on my second EV. Love them. They work perfectly for my needs. That said, they may not be the right solution for everyone. If you regularly drive long distances, maybe get a hybrid. If you can't charge an EV at home, maybe get a hybrid.
- JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. We will be purchasing in within the next two years. We have two ICE vehicles and a garage. None of our daily or even monthly driving habits exceed the range of the Genesis GV60 we are considering. This includes driving to our coastal home which (once purchased) will be about 150 miles away. My wife loves the EV driving experience: no stopping for smelly gas, smooth and instant acceleration, no noise or fumes. She works from home so weekly trips are quick shopping runs or visiting friends / family nearby. I will likely borrow the car for commuting but even then I work 3 days in the office. I get that EVs don't work for some people but I believe many would be perfectly fine with them if they were honest about their driving habits. The range and charging fears are the same nonsense as those that buy 4x4s only because there was that one time they had to drive over some gravel and thru mud due to construction. People tend to buy factoring in "what if" scenarios that almost never occur. For example I had a Quad Cab truck for 20 years, in that time I used the back seats less then a dozen times.
- Pianoboy57 Yes, if it was a Subaru Outback PHEV.
- Jeff S Still an annual sales rate projected at 15.1 million is hardly a big drop in the market especially when you consider the average age of a vehicle on the road is 12.6 years and is up by 2 months from 2023 and continues to go up. Since 2020, more than 27 million passenger cars exited the US vehicle population, while just over 13 million new passenger cars were registered. At the same time, over 26 million light trucks (including utilities) were scrapped and nearly 45 million were registered. The U.S. auto industry sold nearly 3.12 million cars in 2023. That year, total car and light truck sales were approximately 15.5 million in the United States. U.S. vehicle sales peaked in 2016 at roughly 17.5 million units. Total sales of new, light-duty vehicles in the U.S. reached about 13.6 million units in 2022, while total used sales were just under 39 million units that year.
Comments
Join the conversation
Ok, first of all Mr. Niedermeyer, Do you make it a habit of trespassing onto people's property, (namely MINE) and photographing cars when someone (namely me) was going thru a very brutal divorce of 20 years and just lost my 4 kids. This car was GOING to be a car for my older kids prom at Crow High school. Your disclosure of my situation and posting it all over the internet is not only sleezy but shows that you have no respect for anyone including yourself. Yes this car was half done. Let me guess though for a moment: You have probably NEVER done anything custom in your life except for the critical commenting you do on various cars around Eugene Oregon you display on your curbside classics. I have been a machine shop owner for 25 years and a craftsman and to have some stranger as you not even have the decency to ASK ME if you can post potentially litigious material during my time of crucifixion is nothing short of uncalled for. As for the ensuing shark feeding frenzy, again, probably a bunch of non creative types that dont even know how to rebuild an engine, or weld, but experts at criticism. So I say to the automotive king of paparazzi Mr.Niedermeyer: MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS and stop trespassing and hurting others just for your own twisted pleasure. For the record the car was supposed to just be for fun, and it was right up until the time I stumbled across your journalistic abortion. Due to my private matter of divorce (that you made public) I didn't get to finish it in time for the prom. At 70 mph your hair would not even move, try that in a 65 mustang!
Love these things...