Tesla's Model S Ponzi Scheme Rakes in $2.6M. At Least

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Now you may think that Tesla Motors, makers of the $109K+ lithium-ion powered Roadster, are acting in good faith re: taking deposits for their recently revealed Model S sedan. If so, GreenTech Media’s report that the Musk-scented company has secured 520 advance orders for the vehicle is a good thing: a sign of early adopters’ faith in Tesla’s ability to design, build and, eventually, sell the all-electric foor-door. Leaving aside Tesla’s past history of missing deadlines and changing announced specifications. With eyes wide shut, the fact that Tesla has collected $5K per car from 520 prospective customers, generating some $2.6M, is a good thing. Nothing wrong with raising a little—and in the car business $2.6 million is microscopic—working capital. The fact that Tesla’s first model, the Roadster, isn’t profitable, and that the new money may be helping to prop-up THAT side of the business, is neither here nor there nor the subject of a court case. So . . . good news! There may be more money on Tesla’s table!

You can plunk down $5,000 for a regular Model S or 40,000 for a “Signature Edition,” which is supposed to come with some nifty features that Tesla has yet to disclose. The company plans to make 2,000 of the special edition cars – half of them for the U.S. market and the other half for Europe.

Figuring half of those 520 orders are for the we-won’t-tell-you-what-that-means “Signature Edition,” Tesla may have recapitalized off its true believers’ backs to the tune of $6.5 million. Still not much. But better.

And what if Tesla doesn’t receive a dime of federal financing and goes belly-up? Although Musk has publicly pledged to back up deposits with his personal fortune, our sources say there is no such language on the deposit contract.

That said, if Tesla would like to email a jpeg or pdf of same to robertfarago1@gmail.com, I’d be happy to put the document up here for TTAC’s Best and Brightest to see for themselves.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Apr 02, 2009
    It seems to me that cutting edge technologies are more likely to be embraced by smaller specialty firms than large, full-line manufacturers like Toyota. You'd think that, but as much or more cutting-edge work comes out of larger organizations than out of smaller ones, and generally with more polish and certainly more commercially viable. The Rogue Valley Entrepreneur isn't nearly the phenomenon it once was, especially now that a) larger companies are more favourable to R&D than they used to, if for no other reason than it provides patent fodder and b) it's nice to work for someone who can facilitate your every whim. You'll certainly see the occasional out-of-left-field win (like, say, Twitter) but that's not what Tesla is pitching. They're just a glorified coachbuilder/integrator with a good PR machine, and wouldn't stand a chance against the likes of Toyota, Honda or even GM's depth of engineering and research resources---if the big boys thought that the market Tesla and Fisker were playing in was commercially viable.
  • Joeaverage Joeaverage on Apr 02, 2009

    GO TESLA!!! They are delivering product and people want to place deposits. I'd say whether this is right or not is between the customer and the company. Right now I have more faith in them than I do GM delivering the Volt or in Phoenix Motor Cars delivering their SUT. The "S" is really, really nice looking. Might not be as good in person - dunno. Have always liked GM products better in pics than in person... I'm glad to see a company putting usable, refined EVs on the road. Not GEMs, not little pyramid looking things from the 1970s, not spacey Apteras (though congrats to them to for getting them out there). I'd buy an "S" but they belong to another tax bracket. I suppose I'm more likely convert my daily driver as it's value approaches nil in a few years.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next