Capsule Review: 2005-2008 Mitsubishi Colt

Martin Schwoerer
by Martin Schwoerer
capsule review 2005 2008 mitsubishi colt

You already have Schadenfreude, Rucksack, Kindergarten, Fahrvergnügen. May I offer another useful German compound word? Verschlimmbesserung. Meaning: making something worse (in the process of trying to improve it). Car companies are good at Verschlimmbesserung, as proven by the Mitsubishi Colt.

The Mitsubishi Colt is like a slightly less sophisticated but cheerful cousin to the Honda Fit. It was developed in cooperation with Daimler (the Smart ForFour was almost identical but bombed in the market, and got discontinued soon after its 2004 introduction). Both Colt and ForFour had great roominess and versatility. There is more interior space than in a Golf and the sliding rear seats provide E-class rear legroom upon request.

To me, French designer Olivier Bouley did a fine job of making the Colt look tidy, coherent and well-proportioned. I have no qualms with the Colt’s tidy handling either, which is closer to the floaty, comfortable French ideal than to the jitteriness of the Fit. One Colt I drove was equipped with the tiny 1.1L, 75HP, three-cylinder engine. Pre-recession Americans would find it pathetically wanting in torque, but when I drove it in Lisbon and through the hills of central Portugal, I liked how the engine enjoyed being revved endlessly, felt lightweight over the front suspension and never got loud. I have also driven the 1.3L four, but to me that’s an underwhelming, generic engine that has none of the charm of the basic package.

For 2009, Mitsu has facelifted the Colt: new sad-agressive styling (thumbs down), no more sliding rear seats (running out of thumbs!), better interior plastics (which doesn’t make that great a difference), and better noise insolation (now, this is very welcome; the old-style Colt was a boomy box). I still prefer the old one, now selling at discount prices, starting at 8.9K Euros (in Europe), which is a bargain. I’d recommend this car to anybody in Japan, Germany or Australia (it seems they’re being sold everywhere except in the U.S.), who is looking for very pleasant, basic transportation at a price point way below the Fit.


Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Michal Michal on Dec 02, 2008

    Test drove one a few years back. Pretty good handling and decent power. CVT transmission took a little getting used to. However I found the seats oddly uncomfortable. They seemed to cut off the circulation to my legs... leading to numbness after less than 10 minutes driving. It's unusual as I own a similar vintage Lancer and have no issues with it. Must be a very different seat design. The foot park brake is a demented idea, from a practicality and safety point of view. I have seen seasoned manual transmission drivers get into an auto and instinctively try to press the clutch... guess what would happen here. Foot brakes feel unnatural and there's something odd about overruling decades of common sense design. And no, the Colt doesn't have a front bench seat. The indicator ticker was on the far left in a right hand drive car. It sounded odd... very odd for a Japanese built car. Shows through the European design underpinnings. Cargo cover was an optional extra at time of test drive. I consider this an absolutely mandatory item for any hatch. Who wants potential thieves to have a good look at the goodies in your boot?

  • Mirko Reinhardt Mirko Reinhardt on Dec 02, 2008

    @Michal Where did you drive one? Europe didn't get CVTs or foot-operated park brakes. All European Colts were made in the Netherlands at NedCar (the former DAF car factory that used to make the Mitsubishi-platform Volvo S/V40)

  • Wjtinfwb How does the ICE mid-engine C8 platform work for... anything else? A sedan? SUV? With a mid engine configuration? A mid-engine SUV will have to be Suburban sized to offer the utility of a CRV. GM should dust off the Omega platform designed for the Cadillac CT6 for an SUV/Sedan offering with exceptional handling, Rear or AWD capability and acceptable space utilization. They also need to focus on interior fit & finish, trim choices and high quality final engineering and assembly. What GM doesn't need is another half-baked product with a storied and prestigious badge on the decklid and a premium price on the Monroney. No more Cimarron's, Allante's or X-cars needed to tarnish the reputation of Corvette.
  • InCogKneeToe BUILD It and they will come.By Build It, I mean a Vehicle that the Customer Wants and it works for them. It could be called Chevette for all that that matters. The Mach E's success isn't because it totes the Mustang on it.Just build what people want, the next Caravan/Taurus/Beetle/Maverick (truck).
  • YellowDuck Wait...how do you make a mid-engine crossover? Or even a 4-door coupe? Me not get.
  • 28-Cars-Later Thanks Corey. The head stud job on NOrthSTAR-T was $3K *years ago* as it involves an engine pull so rear wheel arch rust in and of itself isn't a show stopper. I'll be sure to check out the trunk as it may start to add up on deferred maintenance. Supposedly this was garaged so the underneath the rockers etc. should be decent but if those are shot its not gonna work.
  • Mark 2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid, G4NG engine with connecting rod bearing issues. Engine needs to be replaced, but Hyundai is denying warranty claim. I have all maintenance records from mile zero. It has been in Hyundai Service department 5 time in 4 months. They added the knock sensor and software update to let you know the engine is about to blow up. They kicked the can down the road doing patch work until the car was past the 120k extended extended warranty. I have that documentation too. So how can I join the class action law suit or find a Lawyer that handles these types of issues?
Next