Ford Death Watch 39: Bah Humbug
It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas; at least in Dearborn. Ford has reinstated merit raises for their white collar workers. Bonuses for its blue collared brigade are under consideration. Ford’s global manufacturing guru Joe Heinrichs figures “it’s important to reward people for doing the right thing.” Which is… three straight quarters of besting Wall Street’s paltry projections and slowing the Way Fordward’s cash burn. With the long anticipated sale of Jaguar and Land Rover only days away, it would seem that Mulally’s machine is running smoothly. Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus.
No question: FoMoCo’s financial outlook is festively plump compared to last year’s lump of coal. That’s mainly due to the fact that Alan Mulally’s minions have slashed and burned their way through the Blue Oval’s bloated bureaucracy. After paying off the United Auto Workers, they’ve taken an axe to Ford’s chronic overproduction, shuttering plants, eliminating shifts and generally cleaning house.
Bottom line: the Blue Oval’s downsized their cash burn from an estimated $17b per year, down to a measly $12b to $14b per year.
To celebrate this turn of events (i.e. better balance their books and lighten a debt load that makes Paraguay look flush), Ford recently spawned 62m more shares of common stock. And the stock found buyers too, thanks to the ongoing belief that you (and by that I mean Ford) CAN cut your way to prosperity. Why all Ford has to do to turn its ass around is… right-size the company to the point where production meets demand!
Only demand for Ford products shows no signs of recovery. The truth is, Ford’s “product lead” turnaround is still stuck in neutral. Indeed, the Blue Oval Boyz market share continues to erode. Reviewing their latest internal report card, Ford’s number crunchers cringed when even their employer failed to meet its modest market share projections: 13 percent. Currently (through November) Ford reps just 12.4 percent of the North American pie, and the slice is getting smaller by the day.
Not surprisingly, fingers were pointed outside the Glass House, at FBOC (Factors Beyond our Control). The usual suspects were all present and accounted for: the “faster than expected” market shift from SUVs and trucks to small cars and crossovers; the rise in fuel prices and the fall in the economy as a result of the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Absent, of course, was any acknowledgement that, at this point, they should know better.
Ford simply ignored the North American customer. As analysts (and TTAC) have pointed out on numerous occasions, FoMoCo’s mélange of motorized product is truck heavy. Currently, the Ford brand offers customers six car models and nine trucks. Mercury’s ratio is better at 4:3 (cars to trucks). Lincoln, FoMoCo’s luxury marque, is more vulnerable, with only two car platforms and three trucks.
With the demise of the Panther platform (Crown Victoria, Mercury Marquis, Lincoln Town Car), three car models will disappear from the Ford roster, resulting in an even heavier truck-based portfolio. The Ford Focus is FoMoCo’s smallest model, its only American economy car. The 2007 TTAC Ten Worst nominee’s moving slightly more units than the vine-withered model it replaced. The automaker’s next next big thing, the Ford Flex, is just that: another big “thing.”
Bottom line: through November, FoMoCo’s car sales are already down over 24 percent from last year. So even the few Ford passenger cars available aren’t winning over consumers.
Auto analysts Robert Barry (Goldman, Sachs & Co) and Rod Lache (Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.) both reckon Ford’s decade long decline is nowhere near done. Not unlike Toyota, Honda and Nissan, Barry realizes that “demand growth will be greatest for smaller cars” and that without them, Ford’s market share is simply “unsustainable.”
Worse, Barry also contends that Ford’s current production-related savings are fleeting at best. Because of increasing regulatory demands (i.e. new Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards), Ford will need to spend more on each and every vehicle produced. In his analysis Barry figures the new UAW contract will save Ford about $4b in “structural cost reductions.” The automaker will need that money, and then some, to the tune of $11.9b, just to keep up.
The Detroit News reports that Ford Americas President, Mark Fields expects the 2007 US light vehicle market to hit its lowest mark in about a decade (16.4m units). Fields also expects that number to fall further next year, to around 15.3m units. Figuring 12.5 percent market share, that means Ford will move around 1,912,500 units.
Of course this all depends on an economy that, the Federal Reserve figures, is poised to continue to weaken. “Modest” Mark said Ford is “planning conservatively.” They’ll “look at things on a month-to-month basis” and “take appropriate actions if things go worse than expected.”
Bottom line: Happy New Year!
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- GrumpyOldMan Lost me at the last word of the second paragraph.
- Bobbysirhan I suppose this explains why almost everything that makes a GM product function has been Chinese for several years now.
- Kevin 35 grand if a 2 door but not a 4 door!
- Kevin 35 grand USD for a 57 wagon that still needs lots of work such as spindles body work and what ever else maybe 25 but 35 no thanks I'll stick with what I have. Floor pans replaced and whatever else my 68 chevelle I paid $4800.00 USD 20 years ago and is all original.
- FreedMike Needs a few more HP to really spice things up...
I can see where you are coming from Macca. As for the whole FWD versus RWD debate, the 300 and the Mustang have proven there is a market for such vehicles and that they also have not slowed the sales of Camrys and Accords. RWD is a niche but some on this forum do seem to think that it is a magic bullet for Detroit's problems. The most consistent fallacy that I see people make in their opinions is to assume that their tastes and preferences are either universal truths or at least mirrors that of the general population.
Way late getting in on this, but I thought I would throw in my two cents worth (Okay, so it's not even worth that much on the open market). 1.) Panther cars collectively are the ‘ultimate driving machines’. That's a bit of an overstatement. Yes people on this board, as well as every other general car oriented board that I have frequented, typically trumpet the value of Crown Vics, but I don't recall reading any posts touting them as the ultimate driving machine (other than possibly one person on another board that i used to frequent). 2.) FWD = FAIL wheel drive. Further, those that drive FWD suck at life. I really don't see that in the postings here, particularly the second part. There are those that prefer rear wheel drive, though, and they have every right to feel that way and voice their opinions. 3.) The Camry, especially the latest model, is an abomination. While I wouldn't put it quite like that, the Camry redesign is p--- poor IMHO. But, as they say, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. 4.) The redesigned Accord is an unmitigated disaster. Eh. (Shrugs shoulders.) 5.) Wagons rule, CUVs drool. Wagons do get an unfair rap given that they are typically the best solution for the average family out there. 6.) New car purchases are for fools. Maybe not for fools, but a used car purchase is more economical than a new car purchase. I think that the people who recommend used car purchases, wouldn't use the term fool for those who buy a new car. The last two cars that I bought were both new. I just wanted a new car, and I could afford it. I do plan on buying used again from here on out though.