General Motors Death Watch 147: Everything You Know is Wrong

general motors death watch 147 everything you know is wrong

Day two of the UAW strike and media consensus has been reached: chill. Amongst The Detroit News’ (DTN) hopeful headlines: “Gettelfinger: Strike may prod bargainers to end stalemate.” Uh, isn’t that the point of a strike? Anyway, in a piece entitled “GM Can Handle A Short Strike,” the DTN rounds-up the usual suspects to allay fears that the automaker and its union are headed straight to Hell. In sum, “Analysts view GM's tough bargaining as a calculated gamble that is likely to pay off.” That’s a bit like saying Russian roulette offers its players terrific odds.

The party line: GM is finally getting tough with the UAW. According to auto insiders, that’s a good thing (unless the strike goes on too long and then it bloody well isn’t). But those analysts who view the UAW’s company-wide walkout through the prism of traditional labor relations– it’s high time GM “taught the union a lesson”– fail to understand that this isn’t about GM getting tough. It’s about GM not being able to afford its union.

This is the idée fixe that informed GM’s side of the negotiations. And it’s true. Unless GM pares down its labor costs, overseas profits or no, they’re headed straight for Chapter 11. But, the union counters, that’s only true because of YOUR incompetence. If you designed better cars you'd make enough money to pay us what we want. That’s the UAW’s idée fixe and it’s also true. GM’s erstwhile leadership has shown no ability to get its product-related shit together in the US market.

So here we have the UAW and GM management blaming each other for the poisoned fruits of their shared arrogance, incompetence, intransigence and greed. The obvious answer: both sides should sit down and figure out the best possible way to work together to right the ship, setting aside all past agreements. That’s about as likely as Tom and Jerry getting married in Mississippi.

The single largest roadblock to union – management cooperation is GM management’s refusal to accept the fact that their entire North American business is going down in flames. GM’s brands are meaningless, its products uncompetitive and its dealer network bloated beyond any rational idea of sustainability. “Tweaking” the underlying business model– whether through a $51b union health care superfund or a reduction in union salaries– won’t rescue GM from the abyss.

What’s needed is radical surgery. Given the franchise law strait-jacket prohibiting the required dealericide, and the union’s satisfaction (indeed love of) the status quo, there’s only one way GM management could sort out both its labor problem and its business fundamentals: Chapter 11.

Most people consider Chapter 11 a way to jettison union contracts and hire scab labor. This is far from the case. GM would a very hard time indeed finding a federal judge willing to [risk life and limb and] toss the UAW aside. The situation over at bankrupt parts maker Delphi illustrates the point perfectly; UAW workers worked under their “old” contract from bankruptcy declaration (October ’05) to July ’07.

Even in Chapter 11, GM would have to work with the UAW to find a way to reinvent their relationship. Why wait? GM could use this strike as an opportunity/excuse to approach the UAW ahead of a bankruptcy petition and say “We’re all in this together guys. Let’s find a way to start with a clean slate. What would a commercially successful, American-based, fully unionized automaker look like?”

And then I woke up.

It’s a Catch 22. The sort of management team who could even consider this strategy is not the sort of management team that would have put the company in this position in the first place. The fact that GM’s top brass drew down millions in compensation as the company’s market share sank, profits dwindled and union negotiations loomed is all the proof– if proof be needed– that GM management doesn’t have the humility required to admit that everything they know is wrong.

So, will the UAW strike last more than a week? If so, GM is doomed. An analyst for Lehman Brothers told the Associated Press that the UAW strike would cost GM around $8b per month. Speaking to the DTN, BNP-Paribas analyst Brad Rubin pegs the cost of a month-long GM strike at $4b, and adds that the hit would likely tip the automaker into bankruptcy. And therein lies the tale…

Is it really possible that GM is now so weak that a “mere” $4b loss could send them into federal court clutching bankruptcy papers, hoping against hope that they have enough cash to recover? If so, it doesn’t really matter if the UAW and GM sign a new contract. The ongoing slide in GM’s US profits will top that number by year’s end. Chapter 11? Anyway you look at this, they lose.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 77 comments
  • Kazoomaloo Kazoomaloo on Sep 26, 2007

    I've thought this strike was just posturing for a while now, I'm glad it's over so UAW workers don't have to live off of $200/week. VEBA here we come...

  • Glenn126 Glenn126 on Sep 26, 2007

    Looks like the strike is over, which makes Dynamic 88 the pundit of the day - and give RF a chance to do several more GM Death Watches. I didn't even look at the news details closely about what GM and the UAW did. Didn't really need to - because it doesn't even matter what GM did with the UAW - THEY CANNOT AFFORD WHATEVER THEY JUST DID! (C'mon, let's be totally honest - the General Messup Corporation has itself painted into a corner, alongside the UAW). More like stuck in a corner with a butter knife, in a jousting contest against competitors with long swords, actually....

  • Ronnie Schreiber From where is all that electricity needed to power an EV transportation system going to come? Ironically, the only EV evangelist that I know of who even mentions the fragile nature of our electrical grid is Elon Musk. None of the politicians pushing EVs go anywhere near it, well, unless they are advocating for unreliable renewables like wind and solar.
  • FreedMike I just don’t see the market here - I think about 1.2% of Jeep drivers are going to be sold on the fuel cost savings here. And the fuel cost savings are pretty minimal, per the EPA: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/PowerSearch.do?action=noform&path=1&year1=2022&year2=2022&make=Jeep&baseModel=Wrangler&srchtyp=ymm&pageno=1&rowLimit=50Annual fuel costs for this vehicle are $2200 and $2750 for the equivalent base turbo-four model. I don’t get it.
  • FreedMike How about the “Aztek” package? Wait, this car already has that…Said it before and I’ll say it again: they need to restyle the hind end on this car, stat.
  • Johnster "Vale" is the [s]cheap[/s] lower-priced performance version with black trim and stiff suspension."Mist" is the "DeLuxe" version with a bit more chrome and trim. (Sort of like the "Decor Package" option.)"Magentic" is the full-on Brougham treatment (in its current state) with more chrome trim than the "Mist" and all sorts of gimmicky electronic features inside. (Sadly, it will not include simulated landau irons or a vinyl covered roof, even as an option.)"Aurora" is the Oldsmobile of Cadillacs (sort of like the old Cadillac Calais). No, that's not right. It's the top-of-the-line model, sort of a "Grand Touring" version, with not as much chrome as the "Magentic" but all of the gimmicky electronic features and a stiffer suspension.
  • Drew8MR Why can't CARB leave hobbyists alone? Maybe lay off the low hanging fruit and go after the gross polluters. Bring back the rolling exemption.
Next