F1: 2007 Preview

Mitchell Yelverton
by Mitchell Yelverton

So that’s it. F1’s greatest talent will not win the 2006 World Drivers Championship (WDC). Michael Schumacher admitted as much after last week’s Japanese GP, when engine failure sidelined his car and his hopes of an eighth title. “One cannot always win and things do not always go as planned.” Although Schuey threw in the proverbial towel, there is a way he could snatch victory from the jaws of defeat: if he wins the final race of the season and Renault pilot Fernando Alonso fails to score a single point. It’s not likely. But one thing is for sure: next year’s F1 will be the sport’s new dawn.

Ferrari and Renault remain heavy favorites for the 2007 constructor’s championship, though they should face significant pressure from teams lower down in the pecking order. Red Bull Racing will bring the brand new Adrian Newey-designed RB3 to the track. Given Newey's reputation at McLaren, the RB3 could emerge as a strong contender for the checkered flag– although the McLaren cars' rep for unreliability could mean that Red Bull is unlikely to remain competitive with the top teams for the duration of the season. Toyota’s impressive late-season performance has hinted at the team’s potential. With a blank slate and a blank check, we may well see Toyota challenging for the constructors' title– provided they can motivate the two stiffs they employ as drivers (Ralf Schumacher and Jarno Trulli).

In terms of the World Drivers' Championship, common wisdom holds Kimi Raikkonen as the front runner for next year’s title. Though universally acclaimed as a phenomenal driver, Raikkonen’s championship aspirations have been thwarted by the aforementioned mechanical "issues" over at McLaren. The Iceman’s move to the Ferrari team will finally provide F1 fans a chance to see how good the young Finn really is. Over the last few years, the Scuderia has shown itself peerless in race car design, quality and execution. Aside from the Ferrari team's mechanical prowess, their corporate culture will give the young Finn the backup he needs to concentrate on the job at hand.

Combined with Raikkonen’s well-deserved reputation for relying on his “attachments” (thank you David Hobbs), Kimi should set a blazing pace straight out of the box. In Hobbs’ immortal words, “that Kimi’s a brave boy." In other words, Raikkonen's a Ferrari ace in the classic mold. Back when Enzo Ferrari stalked the halls of Maranello, the Scuderia was known for bringing in young, reckless, extremely quick drivers; many of whom didn’t live out their time in scarlet (see Derrick “Death” Daley’s The Cruel Sport for a fascinating look at the period). Kimi should fit in well with the prevailing ethos, and provide the team with another guiding spirit.

Next season will also go down as first “Year of the Manufacturers.” Manufacturer teams will compromise more of the field in 2007 than ever before. There will be only a handful on privateers on the grid, as many of the independent teams have become little more than adjuncts of the manufacturer teams that supply their engines. This is a trend that is sure to continue in the years to come; whether for good or ill remains to be seen.

The freeze on engine development instituted by the FIA could well be the most significant change for '07. The engines that teams ran over the last two weekends of this season will be homologated for use through the 2010 season. Given the political volatility surrounding F1, it's highly unlikely that the strict, [ostensibly] long-term regulations will remain as they are now. But they signal a significant shift in the sport’s technological development paradigm for the foreseeable future. “Free” from the need to spend significant funds on engine development, aerodynamic development will become paramount.

This development is good news for some teams, particularly Red Bull Racing. When RBR “recruited” Adrian Newey from McLaren this year, they secured one of F1’s premier aerodynamicists. While Newey arrived too late to make a significant impact on the current RB2 racecar, its successor, the RB3, will be a clean sheet Newey design. While untested, it should provide a huge performance leap for the team. In the off-season, we should also see some clever aerodynamic solutions from the rest of the teams vying for pole position.

In short, the 2007 F1 season will be like none before. Despite the much-lamented FIA rule changes, new story lines will arise to breathe new life into both the drivers’ and the constructors’ championships. Raikkonen in scarlet, the consolidation of manufacturer power and Schumi’s absence should all provide ample entertainment and a highly competitive championship. For the first time in years, F1 is wide-open.

Mitchell Yelverton
Mitchell Yelverton

More by Mitchell Yelverton

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Chaz_233 Chaz_233 on Oct 23, 2006

    Let's not forget the Toyoduh-engineered debacle at Indy last year. And the "suprise" move by Toyoduh from Michelin to Bridgestone, while Bridgestone still supplies Ferrari. Who knows what secrets they are stealing there for Toyoduh.

  • Jaje Jaje on Oct 23, 2006

    Johnson - You are right about the ban in WRC (I was given a bad source when I read that information). To note Toyota treated this as a permanent ban b/c it upset the management to no end. But you seem to ignore the fact that Toyota took a Target Ganassi car to the auto show circuit (post Ganassi buyout) and listed the mfgrs and drivers championships won when Honda was the engine provider? To me that is the most underhanded and dishonest thing a company can do (take credit for other's success)! Now why is it that CART broke their own engine change rules to switch to a 3.5 n/a v8 (ala IRL) only one company had a clear advantage with this move and it was Toyota? Now, what happened to CART - spec Ford series and a shadow of what it was (Honda broke of off finding that Toyota was again exerting it's pressure). IRL benefitted greatly as they had Toyota $$s and Honda joined to compete only to rack up the most impressive beating of it's competition in recent memory. Going gets tough - Toyota quit the IRL too. As for F1: Toyota spends more on F1 than almost all other mfgrs - the point was that $$ didn't buy you a win (and neither does their political pressures). How many wins did Toyota get last year in 2005? (zero!). Honda won it's first race in a long time this year. Fact is Ferrari is the class of the field and Renault is now coming into its own so wins are hard to come by. In fact Honda has won many championships and crowns in F1 (look at the late 80's to mid 90's). Honda sticks with it even when the going gets tough - they are not quitters. In fact here's Hondas more recent history just in F1. 2006 Honda (4th) 86 / Toyota (6th) 35 2005 Toyota (45th) 88 / Honda (6h) 38 2004 BAR Honda (2nd) 119 / Toyota (8th) 9 2003 BAR Honda (5th) 26 / Toyota (8th) 16 2002 Jordan Honda (6th) 9 / BAR Honda (8th) 7 / Toyota (10th) 2 2001 Jordan Honda (5th) 19 / BAR Honda (6th) 17 2000 BAR Honda (5th) 20 / Jorden Mugen (6th) 17 1999 Jordan Mugen (3rd) 61 1998 Jordan Mugen (4th) 34 1997 Prost Mugen (6th) 21 1996 Ligier Mugen (6th) 15 1995 Ligier Mugen (5th) 24 1994 (no Honda) - Financial trouble 1993 Footwork Mugen (9th) 4 1992 McLaren Honda (2nd) 99 / Footwork Mugen (7th) 6 1991 McLaren Honda (1st) 139 / Tyrrell Honda (6th) 12 1990 McLaren Honda (1st) 121 1989 McLaren Honda (1st) 141 1988 McLaren Honda (1st) 199 / Lotus Honda (4th) 23 1987 Williams Honda (1st) 127 / Lotus Honda (3rd) 64 1986 Williams Honda (1st) 141 1985 Williams Honda (3rd) 71 1984 Williams Honda (6th) 26 1983 Williams Honda (11th) 2 Go Back into the 60's when Honda was a small company and competing in F1 and Isle of Mann TT. In fact Honda has 100's of other championships and wins from cars (F1, CART, IRL, GT2 Win at the 24hrs of LeMans, to motorcycles and at times dominated each series they compete in As for technology...Toyota finally get some racing inspired designs in new Lexus! By the way did you know that Honda's economy cars got variations of the suspension design from F1, or Variable valve time technology (Toyota's only true VTEC copy came by Yamaha built 1.8 engines engines in the defunct Celica GTS and now the Elise). Super Aguri took a 3 year old defunct BAR Honda chassis literally from a display case and started racing it just before the season started (it was a last minute decision in the F1 world). Over the entire year their performance and reliability improved substantially. In fact in Brazil Sato finished in 10th just outside the points over the Midlands Toyota, Cosworth, RB Ferrari and he was catching up to Kubica in the BMW Sauber. In fact you're a little out of touch with Honda's passion for motorsports from its founder. Go to these two websites to read about their focus, dedication and committment. http://racing.honda.com/about/heritage.aspx http://world.honda.com/timeline/motorsports/

  • Theflyersfan OK, I'm going to stretch the words "positive change" to the breaking point here, but there might be some positive change going on with the beaver grille here. This picture was at Car and Driver. You'll notice that the grille now dives into a larger lower air intake instead of really standing out in a sea of plastic. In darker colors like this blue, it somewhat conceals the absolute obscene amount of real estate this unneeded monstrosity of a failed styling attempt takes up. The Euro front plate might be hiding some sins as well. You be the judge.
  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
Next