It's a Drab, Drab World
Remember when you got your first 64-count box of Crayola Crayons? After inhaling the trademark smell, your eyes were dazzled, your left brain inspired by an eye-popping kaleidoscope of colors. You never knew there were so many different shades of blue and yellow and red and green. You could draw anything you wanted and you’d always have just the right color. And when you started drawing cars – man! That’s when you’d pull out all the best hues. Never ecru or black or white or gray, though. No way! You always drew your dream cars in the brightest Technicolor hues you could find. Too bad today’s designers don’t remember those fun times.
The next time you’re stuck in traffic, look around. Check out how many vehicles have been painted in minor variations of the same generic colors. Carmakers’ color palettes currently range from uninteresting to downright depressing. The occasional vivid yellow or red stands out like a hooker at a Liberty University pep rally. Visit any car lot and you’ll find yourself awash in a sea of black, white, silver, gray and beige. If you want something a bit more vibrant, you’re probably out of luck; most car makers who offer reds, greens, or blues usually do so in the darkest shades possible. Even if you find a manufacturer willing to serve up something brighter, chances are you’ll have to special order it.
Boldly colored cars drove off the automotive scene at about the same time as bold styling disappeared into a gaping sinkhole of mediocrity. Starting in the late ‘70’s, automobiles– and their Armani-clad designers– began to look more and more alike. As the “bean counters” took over from the “car guys,” designers began copying each other and, eventually, themselves. Mass market motors went straight from bold to boxy to droopy to dull. The trend to dreary colors moved in perfect synchronicity with the shift towards dreary styling. The relentless excretion of cookie-cutter, cost-cutting crap continued into the ‘90’s and the new millennium. And now, even though fresh thinking has finally appeared on the design front, color choices are still stuck in the ‘90’s.
When the distinctive colors disappeared, they took the distinctive graphics and trim packages with them. I guess we’ve become too sophisticated to be seen in cars decked out with stripes or other graphics. Sure, there are the one-size-fits-all graphics you see on the rice burners; the ones that look like someone slapped paint on with a broom. Close but no cigar. Graphics should be tailored to the design of the individual car, highlighting its lines and making a statement specific to that model’s character. (Only the MINI “gets it.”) Think of your favorite Detroit car from the ‘60’s or early ‘70’s. Chances are it has distinctive graphics that complete the overall “look” for that particular model.
With a few notable (and expensive) exceptions, interiors are just as lackluster as the exteriors. If you’re offered any choice at all, it’s usually between funereal black, sallow tan, or death-pallor gray. Even cars lauded for their interiors use varying shades of these same colors, just in higher-quality materials, with better workmanship. Why did they stop offering the reds, the greens, the blues? Where is it written everything inside a car has to be the same color? A few cheerful colors on the inside would help alleviate the claustrophobic cave effect so common to today’s cabins. Surprisingly, the designers’ color blindness extends to their concept cars. Auto shows offer the expectant public radical shapes and funky designs– in the same four uninteresting colors as their production cars: white, beige, gray or black.
Instead of coming up with exciting new colors, car makers take the easy way out. They commission their marketing lackeys to think of exotic-sounding names for the same old colors. So now you can get Abyss, Neptune, Alloy or French Silk instead of black, dark blue, gray or beige. But as the Bard noted centuries ago, a rose by any other name is just as red (or something like that). Call them what you like, they’re still the same old boring colors that make the automotive landscape meld into a miserable melange of monochromatic monotony.
What ever happened to the automobile as a vehicle for individual expression? Where are Sassy Grass Green, Carousel Red, and Statutory Grape when we need them? Why no modern equivalents to the John Player Specials, strobe stripes or screaming chicken graphics? We need choice, we need flair, we need pizzazz! We need to bring some vibrancy back into the picture. Perhaps we should send every design studio a brand new 64-pack of Crayolas. I reckon it’s time they got back in touch with their inner child.
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- CEastwood Seven mil nitrile gloves from Harbor Freight for oil changes and such and the thicker heavy duty gripper gloves from Wally World for most everything else . Hell we used to use no gloves for any of that and when we did it was usually the white cloth gloves bought by the dozen or the gray striped cuff ones for heavy duty use . Old man rant over , but I laugh when I see these types of gloves in a bargain bin at Home Cheapo for 15 bucks a pair !
- Not Previous Used Car of the Day entries that spent decades in the weeds would still be a better purchase than this car. The sucker who takes on this depreciated machine will learn the hard way that a cheap German car is actually a very expensive way to drive around.
- Bullnuke Well, production cuts may be due to transport-to-market issues. The MV Fremantle Highway is in a Rotterdam shipyard undergoing repairs from the last shipment of VW products (along with BMW and others) and to adequately fireproof it. The word in the shipping community is that insurance necessary for ships moving EVs is under serious review.
- Frank Wait until the gov't subsidies end, you aint seen nothing yet. Ive been "on the floor" when they pulled them for fuel efficient vehicles back during/after the recession and the sales of those cars stopped dead in their tracks
- Vulpine The issue is really stupidly simple; both names can be taken the wrong way by those who enjoy abusing language. Implying a certain piece of anatomy is a sign of juvenile idiocy which is what triggered the original name-change. The problem was not caused by the company but rather by those who continuously ridiculed the original name for the purpose of VERY low-brow humor.