Study: DC Fast-Charging Creates Air Pollution
It’s no secret that extracting the raw materials for batteries and manufacturing EVs have a negative environmental impact, but a recent study showed that charging isn’t the cleanest activity, either. Fast-charging stations create air pollution, which may become a more significant issue as their numbers grow across the country.
The University of California, Los Angeles’ Fielding School of Public Health conducted the study. It determined that fast chargers’ emissions are most likely related to their cooling fans, which can kick up particles like brake dust and tire fragments into the air. Researchers looked at 50 DC fast chargers, most of which were Tesla Superchargers, finding that the air around them was slightly dirtier than the air at gas stations and much dirtier than neighborhoods and parks nearby.
The study’s authors said charger manufacturers can help mitigate the issue by installing filters, and they noted that installing the chargers away from schools and residential areas can help. ChargePoint is already working on the problem, saying it would add filters to its “DC chargers to further reduce the risk of dust or water entering the system, or particulates being expelled.”
All of that said, the researchers were clear that gas stations pose a much more significant health risk. They can produce carcinogens and a range of volatile organic compounds, leading the team to agree that they’d rather charge an EV than pump a tank of fuel.
[Images: Tada Images via Shutterstock, F Armstrong photography via Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.
More by Chris Teague
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- NJRide All automakers should go back to monthly reporting. In the 70s and 80s with way less technology they literally reported every 10 days
- Bd2 that "4.0L" engine is actually 3.9L
- Fisoxix916 My favorite oil drain pan is the one my independent mechanic (no, not Iffy Lube) uses to change my oil. For $65, it's well worth the money as they also preform a visual inspection while it's on the lift. I have not changed my own oil in over 40 years and never will again.
- Slavuta Right now, one can get $3-4K off on 2025 CX5 before even talking to the dealer. And this is what I would do if shopped for that. 2026 has too many screens, too many nannies.
- Slavuta So, nobody cares about oil pans today? I just changed oil in 2 cars, thanks to little weather improvement. And I will tell you, none of these are good. Mine is better but not perfect. It resembles the #8 here. But it has the filter drain, which is a Plus but also a Minus, when it comes to the post-job cleaning.
Comments
Join the conversation
Yet no one "studied" the thing about electrical devices that matters, ionization and ozone.
It's why you don't store your snow tires near the washer and dryer in the basement. All the EVs charging at those stations must be fast-aging their tires from that exposure, making them shed particles faster and wear out sooner.
One single emissions modified no nut diesel truck emits more than a single charger