Carlos Ghosn Re-released From Japanese Jail

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The embattled ex-patriarch of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance has posted an additional $4.5 million in bail. Beyond some new indictments regarding his alleged misappropriation of corporate funds, not much has changed regarding the case. Ghosn and his legal team continue to maintain his innocence, suggesting that Nissan orchestrated the entire ordeal as part of a industrial coup and further supported by Japanese courts that are perpetually hungry for convictions.

Unfortunately, everyone is making a pretty good case. The claims against Ghosn appear legitimate, but so do the accusations that Nissan’s entire investigation was primarily concerned with removing him from power. Similarly, Japan’s extremely high conviction rate and treatment of Ghosn have raised red flags in regard to his civil rights and whether he can expect a fair trial.

The court approved his release on Thursday morning and confirmed that Ghosn posted bail in the early afternoon, allowing for his release later that night. According to Reuters, his release was gently delayed by a failed, last-ditch effort by prosecutors to appeal the decision.

Some interesting stipulations are found in the bail agreement. Ghosn is to have no contact with his wife Carole, whatsoever, without prior permission from the courts, something he is unlikely to receive. Ghosn’s better previously claimed police didn’t even want her to use the bathroom without supervision after they re-arrested Ghosn at their apartment in Tokyo earlier this month on charges of aggravated breach of trust. She has been openly critical of his treatment within the country, frequently pleading to the French government for help. Carole Ghosn flew to Paris to do just that after her husband’s latest arrest on April 4th and, upon her return, was also questioned by the authorities.

The man himself, however, has been careful not to come across as unhinged or fearful. Instead, he’s tried to keep an open dialog with the public — a move made marginally more difficult by his latest arrest. Ghosn’s lawyer, Takashi Takano, says the former auto executive was subjected to almost 72 hours of questioning without legal representation present. While technically legal in Japan, the practice has come under scrutiny with Ghosn’s supporters — especially considering he’s already been arrested and questioned numerous times since November of 2018.

“I am grateful that bail has been granted and thankful for my family and supporters in Japan and around the world who fought for my release,” Ghosn said in a statement following his release. “No person should ever be indefinitely held in solitary confinement for the purpose of being forced into making a confession. But restricting communications and contact between my wife and me is cruel and unnecessary. We love each other very much, she answered all of the prosecutors’ questions in court, and she has done nothing wrong.”

Ghosn’s general communications will also continue to be restricted; any chatting he does engage in is expected to be closely monitored by authorities. A recent report from Automotive News explained that the court said this is being done to prevent him from fleeing the country (which seems like the best plan at this point) or tampering with evidence.

From Automotive News:

The latest indictment focuses on results of an internal Nissan investigation that found Ghosn approved payments of around $35 million from Nissan to a distributor in Oman from 2011 to 2018. The disbursements went to Suhail Bahwan Automobiles, which is run by billionaire Suhail Bahwan, a friend of Ghosn’s, according to someone familiar with the matter. The company distributes Nissan vehicles in the region.

Nissan’s probe found some evidence suggesting Suhail Bahwan Automobiles may have supported Ghosn’s purchase of a yacht and helped finance a company owned by Ghosn’s son.

Japanese media reports said that Ghosn paid Suhail Bahwan Automobiles out of his CEO Reserve, a special fund for ad hoc expenses. The disbursements were marked as marketing expenses, but prosecutors suspect they were channeled into personal use for such things as the purchase of a yacht and a 3 billion yen ($26.8 million) personal loan to Ghosn.

Renault, which ended up working together with Nissan on its internal investigation, is said to have notified French prosecutors that it uncovered suspect payments to a Renault-Nissan business partner in Oman when Ghosn was CEO. But Ghosn continues to claim innocence, suggesting the charges against him are “outrageous and arbitrary” and vowing he will not be broken.

[Image: Plamen Galabov/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 11 comments
  • Tedward Tedward on Apr 27, 2019

    At this point, watching this all unfold, I would think more than twice about personally being involved with a Japanese held company (much as I would a Chinese one). I'm not even sure if Japan realizes how this all looks. In the beginning it was "wait and see", and well, we did. Now things have taken a darker turn here with the obvious mis-treatment of Mr. Ghosen. Even if the funny numbers claims bear out, at this point I'm rooting for this to cost the Japanese government billions, and a dissolution of the Nissan Renault alliance. Also, I'm more than a little surprised at the French governments timidity here. I would expect significant outrage if it was one of our citizens. They must be afraid of losing Renault job positions in France.

  • RHD RHD on Apr 28, 2019

    Maybe this guy can get a job at Volkswagen. He's got the resume to fit in well with their way of doing business.

  • MaintenanceCosts The Truth About Isuzu Troopers!
  • Jalop1991 MC's silence in this thread is absolutely deafening.
  • MaintenanceCosts Spent some time last summer with a slightly older Expedition Max with about 100k miles on the clock, borrowed from a friend for a Colorado mountain trip.It worked pretty well on the trip we used it for. The EcoBoost in this fairly high state of tune has a freight train feeling and just keeps pulling even way up at 12k ft. There is unending space inside; at one point we had six adults, two children, and several people's worth of luggage inside, with room left over. It was comfortable to ride in and well-equipped.But it is huge. My wife refused to drive it because she couldn't get comfortable with the size. I used to be a professional bus driver and it reminded me quite a bit of driving a bus. It was longer than quite a few parking spots. Fortunately, the trip didn't involve anything more urban than Denver suburbs, so the size didn't cause any real problems, but it reminded me that I don't really want such a behemoth as a daily driver.
  • Jalop1991 It seems to me this opens GM to start substituting parts and making changes without telling anyone, AND without breaking any agreements with Allison. Or does no one remember Ignitionswitchgate?At the core of the problem is a part in the vehicle's ignition switch that is 1.6 millimeters less "springy" than it should be. Because this part produces weaker tension, ignition keys in the cars may turn off the engine if shaken just the right way...2001: GM detects the defect during pre-production testing of the Saturn Ion.2003: A service technician closes an inquiry into a stalling Saturn Ion after changing the key ring and noticing the problem was fixed.2004: GM recognizes the defect again as the Chevrolet Cobalt replaces the Cavalier.fast forward through the denials, driver deaths, and government bailouts2012: GM identifies four crashes and four corresponding fatalities (all involving 2004 Saturn Ions) along with six other injuries from four other crashes attributable to the defect.Sept. 4, 2012: GM reports August 2012 sales were up 10 percent from the previous year, with Chevrolet passenger car sales up 25 percent.June 2013: A deposition by a Cobalt program engineer says the company made a "business decision not to fix this problem," raising questions of whether GM consciously decided to launch the Cobalt despite knowing of a defect.Dec. 9, 2013: Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announces the government had sold the last of what was previously a 60 percent stake in GM, ending the bailout. The bailout had cost taxpayers $10 billion on a $49.5 billion investment.End of 2013: GM determines that the faulty ignition switch is to blame for at least 31 crashes and 13 deaths.It took over 10 years for GM to admit fault.And all because an engineer decided to trim a pin by tenths of a millimeter, without testing and without getting anyone else's approval.Fast forward to 2026, and the Allison name is no longer affiliated with the transmissions. You do the math.
  • Normie I'd hate to have to actually use that awkwardly mounted spare tire in a roadside fix scenario. Bumper jack? Tote around a 40 lb. floor jack? That's a high ridin' buggy!
Next